使用索赔数据的资源利用带分析绘制儿科成像成本支出图。

Danika Baskar, Jamie A Jarmul, Lane F Donnelly
{"title":"使用索赔数据的资源利用带分析绘制儿科成像成本支出图。","authors":"Danika Baskar, Jamie A Jarmul, Lane F Donnelly","doi":"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.07.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To segregate imaging expenditures from claims data by resource utilization bands (RUBs) and underlying conditions to create an \"expenditure map\" of pediatric imaging costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Claims data for children enrolled in a commercial value-based plan were categorized by RUB 0 non-user, 1 healthy user, 2 low morbidity, 3 moderate morbidity, 4 high morbidity, & 5 very high morbidity. The per member per year (PMPY) expense, total imaging spend, and imaging modality with the highest spend were assessed for each RUB. Diagnosis categories associated with high imaging costs were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 40,022 pediatric plan members. 14% had imaging-related claims accounting for approximately $2.8 million in expenditures. Member distribution and mean PMPY expenditure RUB was respectively: RUB 0 (3,037, $0), RUB 1 (6,604, $7), RUB 2 - 13,698, $27), RUB 3 - 13,341, $87), RUB 4 (2,810, $268), RUB 5 (532, $841). RUB 3 had the largest total imaging costs at $1,159,523. The imaging modality with the greatest mean PMPY expense varied by RUB with radiography highest in lower RUBs and MRI highest in higher RUBs. The top 3 diagnoses associated with the highest total imaging costs were developmental disorders ($443,980), asthma ($388,797), and congenital heart disease ($294,977) and greatest mean PMPY imaging expenditures malignancy/leukemia ($3,100), transplant ($2,639), and tracheostomy ($1,661).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Expense mapping using claims data allows for a better understanding of the distribution of imaging costs across a covered pediatric population. This tool may assist organizations in planning effective cost-reduction initiatives and learning how imaging utilization varies by patient complexity in their system.</p>","PeriodicalId":93969,"journal":{"name":"Current problems in diagnostic radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expenditure mapping of pediatric imaging costs using a resource utilization band analysis of claims data.\",\"authors\":\"Danika Baskar, Jamie A Jarmul, Lane F Donnelly\",\"doi\":\"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.07.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To segregate imaging expenditures from claims data by resource utilization bands (RUBs) and underlying conditions to create an \\\"expenditure map\\\" of pediatric imaging costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Claims data for children enrolled in a commercial value-based plan were categorized by RUB 0 non-user, 1 healthy user, 2 low morbidity, 3 moderate morbidity, 4 high morbidity, & 5 very high morbidity. The per member per year (PMPY) expense, total imaging spend, and imaging modality with the highest spend were assessed for each RUB. Diagnosis categories associated with high imaging costs were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 40,022 pediatric plan members. 14% had imaging-related claims accounting for approximately $2.8 million in expenditures. Member distribution and mean PMPY expenditure RUB was respectively: RUB 0 (3,037, $0), RUB 1 (6,604, $7), RUB 2 - 13,698, $27), RUB 3 - 13,341, $87), RUB 4 (2,810, $268), RUB 5 (532, $841). RUB 3 had the largest total imaging costs at $1,159,523. The imaging modality with the greatest mean PMPY expense varied by RUB with radiography highest in lower RUBs and MRI highest in higher RUBs. The top 3 diagnoses associated with the highest total imaging costs were developmental disorders ($443,980), asthma ($388,797), and congenital heart disease ($294,977) and greatest mean PMPY imaging expenditures malignancy/leukemia ($3,100), transplant ($2,639), and tracheostomy ($1,661).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Expense mapping using claims data allows for a better understanding of the distribution of imaging costs across a covered pediatric population. This tool may assist organizations in planning effective cost-reduction initiatives and learning how imaging utilization varies by patient complexity in their system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current problems in diagnostic radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current problems in diagnostic radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.07.018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current problems in diagnostic radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.07.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的按照资源利用率(RUB)和基本病症对索赔数据中的成像费用进行分类,以绘制儿科成像费用的 "支出图":对参加商业价值计划的儿童索赔数据按 RUB 进行分类:0 级非用户、1 级健康用户、2 级低发病率、3 级中等发病率、4 级高发病率和 5 级极高发病率。评估了每个 RUB 的每位会员每年(PMPY)费用、成像总费用和费用最高的成像方式。此外,还评估了与高成像费用相关的诊断类别:结果:共有 40,022 名儿科计划成员。14%的人有影像相关的报销申请,支出约为 280 万美元。成员分布和平均 PMPY 支出 RUB 分别为卢布 0(3,037,0 美元)、卢布 1(6,604,7 美元)、卢布 2 - 13,698,27 美元)、卢布 3 - 13,341,87 美元)、卢布 4(2,810,268 美元)、卢布 5(532,841 美元)。卢布 3 的成像总费用最高,为 1,159,523 美元。PMPY平均费用最高的成像方式因RUB而异,RUB越低,放射成像费用越高,RUB越高,核磁共振成像费用越高。成像总费用最高的前 3 个诊断是发育障碍(443,980 美元)、哮喘(388,797 美元)和先天性心脏病(294,977 美元),而平均 PMPY 成像费用最高的是恶性肿瘤/白血病(3,100 美元)、移植(2,639 美元)和气管造口术(1,661 美元):讨论:使用索赔数据绘制费用图可以更好地了解成像费用在受保儿科人群中的分布情况。这一工具可帮助医疗机构规划有效的成本削减措施,并了解在其系统中,影像检查的使用情况如何因患者的复杂程度而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Expenditure mapping of pediatric imaging costs using a resource utilization band analysis of claims data.

Objective: To segregate imaging expenditures from claims data by resource utilization bands (RUBs) and underlying conditions to create an "expenditure map" of pediatric imaging costs.

Methods: A Claims data for children enrolled in a commercial value-based plan were categorized by RUB 0 non-user, 1 healthy user, 2 low morbidity, 3 moderate morbidity, 4 high morbidity, & 5 very high morbidity. The per member per year (PMPY) expense, total imaging spend, and imaging modality with the highest spend were assessed for each RUB. Diagnosis categories associated with high imaging costs were also evaluated.

Results: There were 40,022 pediatric plan members. 14% had imaging-related claims accounting for approximately $2.8 million in expenditures. Member distribution and mean PMPY expenditure RUB was respectively: RUB 0 (3,037, $0), RUB 1 (6,604, $7), RUB 2 - 13,698, $27), RUB 3 - 13,341, $87), RUB 4 (2,810, $268), RUB 5 (532, $841). RUB 3 had the largest total imaging costs at $1,159,523. The imaging modality with the greatest mean PMPY expense varied by RUB with radiography highest in lower RUBs and MRI highest in higher RUBs. The top 3 diagnoses associated with the highest total imaging costs were developmental disorders ($443,980), asthma ($388,797), and congenital heart disease ($294,977) and greatest mean PMPY imaging expenditures malignancy/leukemia ($3,100), transplant ($2,639), and tracheostomy ($1,661).

Discussion: Expense mapping using claims data allows for a better understanding of the distribution of imaging costs across a covered pediatric population. This tool may assist organizations in planning effective cost-reduction initiatives and learning how imaging utilization varies by patient complexity in their system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The "pseudo-pulmonary AVM sign": an aid to the diagnosis of histoplasmosis and differentiation from pulmonary arteriovenous malformations. A stroke imaging protocol in patients with a history of contrast-induced anaphylaxis. Large language models as an academic resource for radiologists stepping into artificial intelligence research. Assessing radiologist performance. Tumor mutational burden as a marker for radiologic response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1