肺癌切除术后的高凝状态和低分子量肝素预防对凝血功能的影响:血栓弹性成像的结果。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1007/s11748-024-02062-6
Xiaoxiao Yang, Yongsheng Cai, Lihui Ke, Bo Wei
{"title":"肺癌切除术后的高凝状态和低分子量肝素预防对凝血功能的影响:血栓弹性成像的结果。","authors":"Xiaoxiao Yang, Yongsheng Cai, Lihui Ke, Bo Wei","doi":"10.1007/s11748-024-02062-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung cancer patients undergoing surgery are at increased risk for Venous thromboembolism (VTE). We monitored changes in perioperative coagulation status through Thrombo-elastography (TEG), and monitored the anticoagulant effect of low molecular weight heparin through TEG for the first time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From July 2019 to January 2020, 207 patients receiving curative surgery were retrospectively screened. and 23 patients were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Blood samples were required at three time points (prior to, the first and third day after surgery). Some patients were administrated nadroparin calcium daily from the first day after surgery. Repeated measures ANOVA and Chi-square test were used to analyze the coagulation states variation. To balance the confounders, propensity score matching (PSM) was used to determine the differences of coagulation states between patients with or without Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 184 patients, TEG parameters displayed significant procoagulant changes after lung surgery but conventional coagulation tests exhibited paradoxical trends. There were 6.5% (12/184) of patients identified as hypercoagulability before surgery. According to TEG results, the proportion of patients with hypercoagulability rose from 21.7% to 25% postoperatively, but more were classified into platelet or mixed hypercoagulability at third day compared with that at first day (3.8% vs 14.1%, P < 0.001). By PSM analysis, there were no significant differences in the proportion of hypercoagulable patients postoperatively between chemoprophylactic and nonprophylactic group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TEG was eligible to distinguish changing states of hypercoagulability postoperatively and indicate the role of platelet in blood hypercoagulability. Administration of postoperative LMWH prophylaxis showed little mitigation on hypercoagulable states.</p>","PeriodicalId":12585,"journal":{"name":"General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hypercoagulable state and effect of low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis on coagulation after lung cancer resection: results from thrombo-elastography.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoxiao Yang, Yongsheng Cai, Lihui Ke, Bo Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11748-024-02062-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung cancer patients undergoing surgery are at increased risk for Venous thromboembolism (VTE). We monitored changes in perioperative coagulation status through Thrombo-elastography (TEG), and monitored the anticoagulant effect of low molecular weight heparin through TEG for the first time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From July 2019 to January 2020, 207 patients receiving curative surgery were retrospectively screened. and 23 patients were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Blood samples were required at three time points (prior to, the first and third day after surgery). Some patients were administrated nadroparin calcium daily from the first day after surgery. Repeated measures ANOVA and Chi-square test were used to analyze the coagulation states variation. To balance the confounders, propensity score matching (PSM) was used to determine the differences of coagulation states between patients with or without Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 184 patients, TEG parameters displayed significant procoagulant changes after lung surgery but conventional coagulation tests exhibited paradoxical trends. There were 6.5% (12/184) of patients identified as hypercoagulability before surgery. According to TEG results, the proportion of patients with hypercoagulability rose from 21.7% to 25% postoperatively, but more were classified into platelet or mixed hypercoagulability at third day compared with that at first day (3.8% vs 14.1%, P < 0.001). By PSM analysis, there were no significant differences in the proportion of hypercoagulable patients postoperatively between chemoprophylactic and nonprophylactic group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TEG was eligible to distinguish changing states of hypercoagulability postoperatively and indicate the role of platelet in blood hypercoagulability. Administration of postoperative LMWH prophylaxis showed little mitigation on hypercoagulable states.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-024-02062-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-024-02062-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:接受手术的肺癌患者发生静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的风险增加。我们通过血栓弹性成像(TEG)监测围手术期凝血状态的变化,并首次通过 TEG 监测低分子量肝素的抗凝效果:2019年7月至2020年1月,回顾性筛选了207例接受根治性手术的患者,23例患者因不符合纳入标准而被排除。需要在三个时间点(术前、术后第一天和第三天)采集血液样本。部分患者从术后第一天起每天服用纳多肝素钙。采用重复测量方差分析和卡方检验分析凝血状态的变化。为平衡混杂因素,采用倾向评分匹配法(PSM)确定使用或未使用低分子量肝素(LMWH)预防的患者之间的凝血状态差异:在 184 名患者中,TEG 参数在肺部手术后显示出明显的促凝变化,但传统的凝血测试显示出矛盾的趋势。有 6.5%(12/184)的患者在手术前被确定为高凝状态。根据 TEG 结果,术后高凝状态患者的比例从 21.7% 上升至 25%,但与术后第一天相比,术后第三天被归类为血小板或混合型高凝状态的患者更多(3.8% 对 14.1%,P 结论:TEG 可用于区分不断变化的状态:TEG 可以区分术后不断变化的高凝状态,并显示血小板在血液高凝中的作用。术后服用 LMWH 预防药物对高凝状态的缓解作用很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hypercoagulable state and effect of low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis on coagulation after lung cancer resection: results from thrombo-elastography.

Background: Lung cancer patients undergoing surgery are at increased risk for Venous thromboembolism (VTE). We monitored changes in perioperative coagulation status through Thrombo-elastography (TEG), and monitored the anticoagulant effect of low molecular weight heparin through TEG for the first time.

Methods: From July 2019 to January 2020, 207 patients receiving curative surgery were retrospectively screened. and 23 patients were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Blood samples were required at three time points (prior to, the first and third day after surgery). Some patients were administrated nadroparin calcium daily from the first day after surgery. Repeated measures ANOVA and Chi-square test were used to analyze the coagulation states variation. To balance the confounders, propensity score matching (PSM) was used to determine the differences of coagulation states between patients with or without Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) prophylaxis.

Results: In 184 patients, TEG parameters displayed significant procoagulant changes after lung surgery but conventional coagulation tests exhibited paradoxical trends. There were 6.5% (12/184) of patients identified as hypercoagulability before surgery. According to TEG results, the proportion of patients with hypercoagulability rose from 21.7% to 25% postoperatively, but more were classified into platelet or mixed hypercoagulability at third day compared with that at first day (3.8% vs 14.1%, P < 0.001). By PSM analysis, there were no significant differences in the proportion of hypercoagulable patients postoperatively between chemoprophylactic and nonprophylactic group.

Conclusions: TEG was eligible to distinguish changing states of hypercoagulability postoperatively and indicate the role of platelet in blood hypercoagulability. Administration of postoperative LMWH prophylaxis showed little mitigation on hypercoagulable states.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: The General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is the official publication of The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Japanese Association for Chest Surgery, the affiliated journal of The Japanese Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, that publishes clinical and experimental studies in fields related to thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
期刊最新文献
Risk factors for distal stent graft-induced new entry after frozen elephant trunk procedure in chronic aortic dissection. Embankment technique in extended sandwich patch repair for post-infarction ventricular septal rupture. Segmentectomy versus lobectomy: does FEV1.0 change accurately reflect the postoperative cardiopulmonary function? Optimal timing of bridging annuloplasty and patch augmentation for heterotaxy syndrome associated with functional single ventricles. Comparison of segmentectomy and wedge resection for cT1cN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1