在急症医院接受复杂病例管理的患者特征。

IF 0.8 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Professional Case Management Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1097/NCM.0000000000000742
Lesley Charles, Lisa Jensen, Jorge Mario Añez Delfin, Erin Norman, Bonnie Dobbs, Peter George Jaminal Tian, Jasneet Parmar
{"title":"在急症医院接受复杂病例管理的患者特征。","authors":"Lesley Charles, Lisa Jensen, Jorge Mario Añez Delfin, Erin Norman, Bonnie Dobbs, Peter George Jaminal Tian, Jasneet Parmar","doi":"10.1097/NCM.0000000000000742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Improving transitions in care is a major focus of health care planning. In the research team's prior intervention study, the length of stay (LOS) was reduced when patients at high risk for readmission were identified early in their acute care stay and received complex management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study will describe the characteristics of patients receiving complex case management in an urban acute care hospital.</p><p><strong>Primary practice setting: </strong>Acute care hospital.</p><p><strong>Methodology and sample: </strong>This was a retrospective chart review of patients in a previous quality assurance study. A random selection of patients who previously underwent high-risk screening using the LACE (Length of stay; Acuity of the admission; Comorbidity of the patient; Emergency department use) index and received complex case management (the intervention group) were reviewed. The charts of a random selection of patients from the previous comparison group were also reviewed. Patient characteristics were collected and compared using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the intervention group, more patients had their family physicians (FPs) documented (93.1% [81/87] vs. 89.2% [66/74]). More patients in the intervention group (89.7% [77/87] vs. 85.1% [63/74]) lived at home prior to admission. More patients in the intervention group had a family caregiver involved (44.8% [39/87] vs. 41.9% [31/74]). At discharge, more patients in the intervention group (87.1% [74/85]) were discharged home compared with the comparison group (78.4% [58/74]).</p><p><strong>Implications for case management practice: </strong>(1) Having an identified FP, living at home, and having family caregiver(s) characterized those with lower LOS and discharged home. (2) Case management, risk screening, and discharge planning improve patient outcomes. (3) This study identified the importance of having a FP and engaged family caregivers in improving care outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":45015,"journal":{"name":"Professional Case Management","volume":"29 5","pages":"198-205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics of Patients Receiving Complex Case Management in an Acute Care Hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Lesley Charles, Lisa Jensen, Jorge Mario Añez Delfin, Erin Norman, Bonnie Dobbs, Peter George Jaminal Tian, Jasneet Parmar\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NCM.0000000000000742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Improving transitions in care is a major focus of health care planning. In the research team's prior intervention study, the length of stay (LOS) was reduced when patients at high risk for readmission were identified early in their acute care stay and received complex management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study will describe the characteristics of patients receiving complex case management in an urban acute care hospital.</p><p><strong>Primary practice setting: </strong>Acute care hospital.</p><p><strong>Methodology and sample: </strong>This was a retrospective chart review of patients in a previous quality assurance study. A random selection of patients who previously underwent high-risk screening using the LACE (Length of stay; Acuity of the admission; Comorbidity of the patient; Emergency department use) index and received complex case management (the intervention group) were reviewed. The charts of a random selection of patients from the previous comparison group were also reviewed. Patient characteristics were collected and compared using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the intervention group, more patients had their family physicians (FPs) documented (93.1% [81/87] vs. 89.2% [66/74]). More patients in the intervention group (89.7% [77/87] vs. 85.1% [63/74]) lived at home prior to admission. More patients in the intervention group had a family caregiver involved (44.8% [39/87] vs. 41.9% [31/74]). At discharge, more patients in the intervention group (87.1% [74/85]) were discharged home compared with the comparison group (78.4% [58/74]).</p><p><strong>Implications for case management practice: </strong>(1) Having an identified FP, living at home, and having family caregiver(s) characterized those with lower LOS and discharged home. (2) Case management, risk screening, and discharge planning improve patient outcomes. (3) This study identified the importance of having a FP and engaged family caregivers in improving care outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Professional Case Management\",\"volume\":\"29 5\",\"pages\":\"198-205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Professional Case Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCM.0000000000000742\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professional Case Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCM.0000000000000742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:改善护理过渡是医疗保健规划的重点。在研究小组之前进行的干预研究中,如果在急诊住院早期发现有再入院风险的高危患者并对其进行综合管理,住院时间(LOS)就会缩短:本研究将描述一家城市急症护理医院中接受复杂病例管理的患者的特征:研究方法和样本:这是对之前一项质量保证研究中的患者进行的回顾性病历审查。研究人员随机抽取了之前使用 LACE(住院时间、入院时的严重程度、患者的并发症、急诊科使用率)指数进行过高风险筛查并接受过复杂病例管理的患者(干预组)进行病历回顾。此外,还对之前对比组中随机抽取的患者病历进行了审查。通过描述性统计收集并比较了患者的特征:在干预组中,有更多患者的家庭医生(FP)记录在案(93.1% [81/87] vs. 89.2% [66/74])。干预组中有更多患者(89.7% [77/87] vs. 85.1% [63/74])在入院前居住在家中。干预组中有家庭照顾者参与的患者更多(44.8% [39/87] vs. 41.9% [31/74])。出院时,干预组(87.1% [74/85])与对比组(78.4% [58/74])相比,有更多患者出院回家。(2)个案管理、风险筛查和出院规划可改善患者的预后。(3) 本研究确定了有 FP 和家庭护理人员参与对改善护理效果的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characteristics of Patients Receiving Complex Case Management in an Acute Care Hospital.

Background: Improving transitions in care is a major focus of health care planning. In the research team's prior intervention study, the length of stay (LOS) was reduced when patients at high risk for readmission were identified early in their acute care stay and received complex management.

Objective: This study will describe the characteristics of patients receiving complex case management in an urban acute care hospital.

Primary practice setting: Acute care hospital.

Methodology and sample: This was a retrospective chart review of patients in a previous quality assurance study. A random selection of patients who previously underwent high-risk screening using the LACE (Length of stay; Acuity of the admission; Comorbidity of the patient; Emergency department use) index and received complex case management (the intervention group) were reviewed. The charts of a random selection of patients from the previous comparison group were also reviewed. Patient characteristics were collected and compared using descriptive statistics.

Results: In the intervention group, more patients had their family physicians (FPs) documented (93.1% [81/87] vs. 89.2% [66/74]). More patients in the intervention group (89.7% [77/87] vs. 85.1% [63/74]) lived at home prior to admission. More patients in the intervention group had a family caregiver involved (44.8% [39/87] vs. 41.9% [31/74]). At discharge, more patients in the intervention group (87.1% [74/85]) were discharged home compared with the comparison group (78.4% [58/74]).

Implications for case management practice: (1) Having an identified FP, living at home, and having family caregiver(s) characterized those with lower LOS and discharged home. (2) Case management, risk screening, and discharge planning improve patient outcomes. (3) This study identified the importance of having a FP and engaged family caregivers in improving care outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Professional Case Management
Professional Case Management HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
26.70%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Professional Case Management: The Leader in Evidence-Based Practice is a peer-reviewed, contemporary journal that crosses all case management settings. The Journal features best practices and industry benchmarks for the professional case manager and also features hands-on information for case managers new to the specialty. Articles focus on the coordination of services, management of payer issues, population- and disease-specific aspects of patient care, efficient use of resources, improving the quality of care/patient safety, data and outcomes analysis, and patient advocacy. The Journal provides practical, hands-on information for day-to-day activities, as well as cutting-edge research.
期刊最新文献
Case Management in Prevention of 30-Day Readmission in Post-Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. What Do Medicaid Members Want From Their Health Plan?: Insights From a Qualitative Study to Improve Engagement in Case Management. Gather "Round": An Integrated Care Model for the Emergency Department Multi-Visit Patient. Case Managers: Embracing Lifelong Learning. Editor's Commentary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1