学者在教师指导方面的经验:罗伯特-伍德-约翰逊基金会未来护理学者计划。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nursing Outlook Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102247
{"title":"学者在教师指导方面的经验:罗伯特-伍德-约翰逊基金会未来护理学者计划。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Future of Nursing Scholars program supported nurses to complete PhDs in 3 years. Support mechanisms included mentoring by the program office and school faculty, and leadership development activities.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To describe scholars’ perspectives of mentoring received by faculty during the accelerated timeline.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Of 201 scholars, 157 (78%) completed exit surveys, providing qualitative data on their experiences working with faculty mentors.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Scholars highlighted strong mentorship (i.e., accessibility, emotional support) as the most important facilitator to program completion. Mentor challenges were identified as the second-most mentioned barrier to success, while the first was the accelerated timeline.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The scholars’ most-reported mentor-provided facilitators to success were availability and emotional support. Among scholars who noted barriers to their success caused by their mentor relationship, the most-reported issue was lack of access to their mentors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54705,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Outlook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scholars’ experiences with faculty mentoring: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Future of Nursing Scholars Program\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Future of Nursing Scholars program supported nurses to complete PhDs in 3 years. Support mechanisms included mentoring by the program office and school faculty, and leadership development activities.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To describe scholars’ perspectives of mentoring received by faculty during the accelerated timeline.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Of 201 scholars, 157 (78%) completed exit surveys, providing qualitative data on their experiences working with faculty mentors.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Scholars highlighted strong mentorship (i.e., accessibility, emotional support) as the most important facilitator to program completion. Mentor challenges were identified as the second-most mentioned barrier to success, while the first was the accelerated timeline.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The scholars’ most-reported mentor-provided facilitators to success were availability and emotional support. Among scholars who noted barriers to their success caused by their mentor relationship, the most-reported issue was lack of access to their mentors.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Outlook\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Outlook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029655424001404\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Outlook","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029655424001404","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:罗伯特伍德约翰逊基金会未来护理学者项目支持护士在 3 年内完成博士学位。支持机制包括项目办公室和学校教师的指导以及领导力发展活动。目的:描述学者们对在加速时间内接受教师指导的看法:方法:在 201 名学者中,有 157 人(78%)完成了毕业调查,提供了他们与导师合作经历的定性数据:讨论:学者们强调,强有力的导师关系(即可接近性、情感支持)是完成项目的最重要促进因素。导师的挑战被认为是第二大成功障碍,而第一大障碍则是加速的时间表:结论:学者们提到最多的导师提供的成功促进因素是可获得性和情感支持。在指出导师关系对其成功造成障碍的学者中,报告最多的问题是无法接触导师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Scholars’ experiences with faculty mentoring: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Future of Nursing Scholars Program

Background

The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Future of Nursing Scholars program supported nurses to complete PhDs in 3 years. Support mechanisms included mentoring by the program office and school faculty, and leadership development activities.

Purpose

To describe scholars’ perspectives of mentoring received by faculty during the accelerated timeline.

Methods

Of 201 scholars, 157 (78%) completed exit surveys, providing qualitative data on their experiences working with faculty mentors.

Discussion

Scholars highlighted strong mentorship (i.e., accessibility, emotional support) as the most important facilitator to program completion. Mentor challenges were identified as the second-most mentioned barrier to success, while the first was the accelerated timeline.

Conclusion

The scholars’ most-reported mentor-provided facilitators to success were availability and emotional support. Among scholars who noted barriers to their success caused by their mentor relationship, the most-reported issue was lack of access to their mentors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Outlook
Nursing Outlook 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
7.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Nursing Outlook, a bimonthly journal, provides innovative ideas for nursing leaders through peer-reviewed articles and timely reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in nursing practice, education, and research, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. Nursing Outlook is the official journal of the American Academy of Nursing and the Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science and supports their mission to serve the public and the nursing profession by advancing health policy and practice through the generation, synthesis, and dissemination of nursing knowledge. The journal is included in MEDLINE, CINAHL and the Journal Citation Reports published by Clarivate Analytics.
期刊最新文献
A roadmap for the nursing scientific workforce to eliminate health and healthcare inequities. Building decolonial nursing curricula to address disparities in Indigenous women's maternal health The views of nurses and healthcare users on the development of Ubuntu community model in nursing in selected provinces in South Africa: A participatory action research Call to action: Blueprint for change in acute and critical care nursing Chronicling the pursuit for full practice authority in Tennessee: Recommendations for a path forward
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1