{"title":"民族文化对预测非正式学习行为的影响","authors":"Flávia Lucena Barbosa, Jairo Eduardo Borges-Andrade","doi":"10.1108/jwl-04-2024-0088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to investigate the impact of Hofstede’s six national cultural dimensions on informal learning behaviors (ILBs) and how they moderate the prediction of these behaviors by workplace interaction (WI), autonomy (WA) and readiness to learn (RtL).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Cultural scores were extracted from The Culture Factor Group in 2023. Data on ILBs and their antecedents were selected from a Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies sample of 59,103 workers – 33 Countries. The authors applied hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) to analyze data.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>None of those cultural dimensions had significant direct relationships with ILBs. The moderations were significant for power distance (ILBs with WA and RtL), individualism (ILBs with WI) and motivation toward achievement and success (ILBs with WA).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The cultural dimensions were limited to Hofstede’s model, and scores at the country level did not consider individual perceptions of them. The results provide empirical evidence for solid theoretical development on the impact of national culture on informal learning and the development of public policies to promote it.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The authors are unaware of other studies that have quantitatively investigated relationships between ILBs and their antecedents and the cultural dimensions using HLM. Findings from different countries allow for better generalization and may provide directions for research and the expansion of the nomological network on the impact of national culture on ILBs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Workplace Learning","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of national culture in predicting informal learning behaviors\",\"authors\":\"Flávia Lucena Barbosa, Jairo Eduardo Borges-Andrade\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jwl-04-2024-0088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This study aims to investigate the impact of Hofstede’s six national cultural dimensions on informal learning behaviors (ILBs) and how they moderate the prediction of these behaviors by workplace interaction (WI), autonomy (WA) and readiness to learn (RtL).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>Cultural scores were extracted from The Culture Factor Group in 2023. Data on ILBs and their antecedents were selected from a Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies sample of 59,103 workers – 33 Countries. The authors applied hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) to analyze data.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>None of those cultural dimensions had significant direct relationships with ILBs. The moderations were significant for power distance (ILBs with WA and RtL), individualism (ILBs with WI) and motivation toward achievement and success (ILBs with WA).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>The cultural dimensions were limited to Hofstede’s model, and scores at the country level did not consider individual perceptions of them. The results provide empirical evidence for solid theoretical development on the impact of national culture on informal learning and the development of public policies to promote it.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The authors are unaware of other studies that have quantitatively investigated relationships between ILBs and their antecedents and the cultural dimensions using HLM. Findings from different countries allow for better generalization and may provide directions for research and the expansion of the nomological network on the impact of national culture on ILBs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Workplace Learning\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Workplace Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jwl-04-2024-0088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Workplace Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jwl-04-2024-0088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的 本研究旨在探讨霍夫斯泰德的六个国家文化维度对非正式学习行为(ILBs)的影响,以及它们如何调节工作场所互动(WI)、自主性(WA)和学习准备(RtL)对这些行为的预测。关于ILBs及其前因的数据选自国际成人能力评估项目(Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies)的一个样本,该样本包含33个国家的59,103名工人。作者采用层次线性模型(HLM)对数据进行了分析。研究结果没有一个文化维度与 ILBs 有显著的直接关系。在权力距离(ILBs 与 WA 和 RtL)、个人主义(ILBs 与 WI)以及成就和成功动机(ILBs 与 WA)方面,调节作用非常明显。研究局限性/意义文化维度仅限于霍夫斯泰德的模型,国家层面的得分没有考虑个人对这些维度的看法。研究结果为国家文化对非正规学习的影响以及制定促进非正规学习的公共政策提供了坚实的理论依据。原创性/价值作者不知道还有其他研究使用 HLM 定量地调查了非正规学习能力及其前因与文化维度之间的关系。来自不同国家的研究结果可以更好地进行推广,并为研究和扩展国家文化对 ILBs 的影响提供了方向。
The impact of national culture in predicting informal learning behaviors
Purpose
This study aims to investigate the impact of Hofstede’s six national cultural dimensions on informal learning behaviors (ILBs) and how they moderate the prediction of these behaviors by workplace interaction (WI), autonomy (WA) and readiness to learn (RtL).
Design/methodology/approach
Cultural scores were extracted from The Culture Factor Group in 2023. Data on ILBs and their antecedents were selected from a Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies sample of 59,103 workers – 33 Countries. The authors applied hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) to analyze data.
Findings
None of those cultural dimensions had significant direct relationships with ILBs. The moderations were significant for power distance (ILBs with WA and RtL), individualism (ILBs with WI) and motivation toward achievement and success (ILBs with WA).
Research limitations/implications
The cultural dimensions were limited to Hofstede’s model, and scores at the country level did not consider individual perceptions of them. The results provide empirical evidence for solid theoretical development on the impact of national culture on informal learning and the development of public policies to promote it.
Originality/value
The authors are unaware of other studies that have quantitatively investigated relationships between ILBs and their antecedents and the cultural dimensions using HLM. Findings from different countries allow for better generalization and may provide directions for research and the expansion of the nomological network on the impact of national culture on ILBs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Workplace Learning aims to provide an avenue for the presentation and discussion of research related to the workplace as a site for learning. Its scope encompasses formal, informal and incidental learning in the workplace for individuals, groups and teams, as well as work-based learning, and off-the-job learning for the workplace. This focus on learning in, from and for the workplace also brings with it questions about the nature of interventions that might assist the learning process and of the roles of those responsible directly or indirectly for such interventions. Since workplace learning cannot be considered without reference to its context, another aim of the journal is to explore the organisational, policy, political, resource issues and other factors which influence how, when and why that learning takes place.