介入修补术后残留轻度共动脉梯度的预后影响

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Clinical Hypertension Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1111/jch.14875
Wenhao Zhu MD, PhD, Zhiyuan Xia MD, Congcong Zhou PhD, Junyi Wan MD, Jingyu Wang PhD, Yihang Li MD, Jingnan Zhang MD, Michael Henein MD, PhD, Fang Fang MD, PhD, Gejun Zhang MD
{"title":"介入修补术后残留轻度共动脉梯度的预后影响","authors":"Wenhao Zhu MD, PhD,&nbsp;Zhiyuan Xia MD,&nbsp;Congcong Zhou PhD,&nbsp;Junyi Wan MD,&nbsp;Jingyu Wang PhD,&nbsp;Yihang Li MD,&nbsp;Jingnan Zhang MD,&nbsp;Michael Henein MD, PhD,&nbsp;Fang Fang MD, PhD,&nbsp;Gejun Zhang MD","doi":"10.1111/jch.14875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is limited data on the prognostic implications of residual mild coarctation (RMC) in patients with repaired native coarctation of the aorta (CoA). To explore the association of RMC with mid-term comorbidities in post-interventional patients, and the predictive value of the residual pressure gradient. The authors retrospectively analyzed 79 native CoA patients who received successful intervention at our hospital between October 2010 and June 2023. The outcomes of the study were late arterial hypertension (either raised blood pressure or commencement of hypotensive medications) only in normotensive patients at early follow-up and the composite mid-term comorbidities including new-onset aortic injury, re-stenosis, and re-intervention. At a median follow-up of 60 months, late hypertension and mid-term comorbidities occurred in 16 (28.1%) and nine (11.4%) patients, respectively. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis identified invasive peak systolic CoA pressure gradient (PSPG) as the best independent predictor of both outcomes. The maximally selected rank statistics indicated 10 mm Hg as the best PSPG cut-off value for predicting late hypertension. Compared to patients with PSPG &lt; 11 mm Hg, the cumulative event rates of both outcomes were higher in those with PSPG ≥ 11 mm Hg (log-rank test, <i>p</i> &lt; .001 for both endpoints). PSPG ≥ 11 mm Hg was proved to be the independent predictor of late hypertension with a significantly increased risk. In patients with non-surgical CoA repair, the post-interventional RMC and PSPG ≥11 mm Hg are important predictors of clinical comorbidities at mid-term follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":50237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","volume":"26 9","pages":"1098-1109"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jch.14875","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic implications of residual mild coarctation gradient after interventional repair\",\"authors\":\"Wenhao Zhu MD, PhD,&nbsp;Zhiyuan Xia MD,&nbsp;Congcong Zhou PhD,&nbsp;Junyi Wan MD,&nbsp;Jingyu Wang PhD,&nbsp;Yihang Li MD,&nbsp;Jingnan Zhang MD,&nbsp;Michael Henein MD, PhD,&nbsp;Fang Fang MD, PhD,&nbsp;Gejun Zhang MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jch.14875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>There is limited data on the prognostic implications of residual mild coarctation (RMC) in patients with repaired native coarctation of the aorta (CoA). To explore the association of RMC with mid-term comorbidities in post-interventional patients, and the predictive value of the residual pressure gradient. The authors retrospectively analyzed 79 native CoA patients who received successful intervention at our hospital between October 2010 and June 2023. The outcomes of the study were late arterial hypertension (either raised blood pressure or commencement of hypotensive medications) only in normotensive patients at early follow-up and the composite mid-term comorbidities including new-onset aortic injury, re-stenosis, and re-intervention. At a median follow-up of 60 months, late hypertension and mid-term comorbidities occurred in 16 (28.1%) and nine (11.4%) patients, respectively. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis identified invasive peak systolic CoA pressure gradient (PSPG) as the best independent predictor of both outcomes. The maximally selected rank statistics indicated 10 mm Hg as the best PSPG cut-off value for predicting late hypertension. Compared to patients with PSPG &lt; 11 mm Hg, the cumulative event rates of both outcomes were higher in those with PSPG ≥ 11 mm Hg (log-rank test, <i>p</i> &lt; .001 for both endpoints). PSPG ≥ 11 mm Hg was proved to be the independent predictor of late hypertension with a significantly increased risk. In patients with non-surgical CoA repair, the post-interventional RMC and PSPG ≥11 mm Hg are important predictors of clinical comorbidities at mid-term follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"volume\":\"26 9\",\"pages\":\"1098-1109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jch.14875\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.14875\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.14875","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于主动脉原发性闭塞(CoA)修复患者残余轻度闭塞(RMC)对预后影响的数据很有限。为了探讨 RMC 与介入治疗后患者中期合并症的关系,以及残余压力梯度的预测价值。作者回顾性分析了 2010 年 10 月至 2023 年 6 月期间在我院成功接受介入治疗的 79 名原发性 CoA 患者。研究结果显示,早期随访时只有血压正常的患者出现晚期动脉高血压(血压升高或开始服用降压药),中期综合合并症包括新发主动脉损伤、再次狭窄和再次介入。在中位随访 60 个月时,分别有 16 名(28.1%)和 9 名(11.4%)患者出现晚期高血压和中期合并症。多变量 Cox 比例危险回归分析确定,侵入性收缩压峰值 CoA 压力梯度(PSPG)是这两种结果的最佳独立预测因子。最大选择秩统计表明,10 毫米汞柱是预测晚期高血压的最佳 PSPG 临界值。与 PSPG < 11 mm Hg 的患者相比,PSPG ≥ 11 mm Hg 的患者两种结局的累积事件发生率都更高(对数秩检验,两种终点的 p < .001)。事实证明,PSPG≥11毫米汞柱是晚期高血压的独立预测因子,其风险显著增加。在非手术CoA修复患者中,介入后RMC和PSPG≥11 mm Hg是中期随访时临床合并症的重要预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prognostic implications of residual mild coarctation gradient after interventional repair

There is limited data on the prognostic implications of residual mild coarctation (RMC) in patients with repaired native coarctation of the aorta (CoA). To explore the association of RMC with mid-term comorbidities in post-interventional patients, and the predictive value of the residual pressure gradient. The authors retrospectively analyzed 79 native CoA patients who received successful intervention at our hospital between October 2010 and June 2023. The outcomes of the study were late arterial hypertension (either raised blood pressure or commencement of hypotensive medications) only in normotensive patients at early follow-up and the composite mid-term comorbidities including new-onset aortic injury, re-stenosis, and re-intervention. At a median follow-up of 60 months, late hypertension and mid-term comorbidities occurred in 16 (28.1%) and nine (11.4%) patients, respectively. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis identified invasive peak systolic CoA pressure gradient (PSPG) as the best independent predictor of both outcomes. The maximally selected rank statistics indicated 10 mm Hg as the best PSPG cut-off value for predicting late hypertension. Compared to patients with PSPG < 11 mm Hg, the cumulative event rates of both outcomes were higher in those with PSPG ≥ 11 mm Hg (log-rank test, p < .001 for both endpoints). PSPG ≥ 11 mm Hg was proved to be the independent predictor of late hypertension with a significantly increased risk. In patients with non-surgical CoA repair, the post-interventional RMC and PSPG ≥11 mm Hg are important predictors of clinical comorbidities at mid-term follow-up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Journal of Clinical Hypertension PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, monthly publication that serves internists, cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, hypertension specialists, primary care practitioners, pharmacists and all professionals interested in hypertension by providing objective, up-to-date information and practical recommendations on the full range of clinical aspects of hypertension. Commentaries and columns by experts in the field provide further insights into our original research articles as well as on major articles published elsewhere. Major guidelines for the management of hypertension are also an important feature of the Journal. Through its partnership with the World Hypertension League, JCH will include a new focus on hypertension and public health, including major policy issues, that features research and reviews related to disease characteristics and management at the population level.
期刊最新文献
Rationale and Design of a Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group Study of Esaxerenone Versus Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Older Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension on Calcium Channel Blocker Monotherapy (ESCORT-HT). Renal Denervation: New Evidence Supporting Long-Term Efficacy, Alternative Access Routes, and Cost-Effectiveness. Obesity, aldosterone excess, and mineralocorticoid receptor activation: Parallel or intersected circumstances? Catheter-Based Renal Denervation for Resistant Arterial Hypertension: 10-Year Real-World Follow-Up Data. Association between Pan-Immune Inflammation Value and Sarcopenia in Hypertensive Patients, NHANES 1999-2018.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1