全球兽医学中艰难梭菌的抗菌药耐药性:最低抑菌浓度范围综述

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES One Health Pub Date : 2024-07-20 DOI:10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100860
{"title":"全球兽医学中艰难梭菌的抗菌药耐药性:最低抑菌浓度范围综述","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To provide a comprehensive characterization of <em>Clostridioides difficile</em> antimicrobial resistance (AMR) data in veterinary medicine based on the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of all antimicrobial agents tested in relation to the techniques used.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and its associated checklist. The objective was to provide a synthesis of the evidence in a summarized and analyzed format.</p><p>To this end, three scientific databases were consulted: Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science, up until December 2021. Subsequently, all identified literature was subjected to screening and classification in accordance with the established study criteria, with the objective of subsequent evaluation.</p></div><div><h3>Study selection and data extraction</h3><p>A comprehensive analysis was conducted on studies regarding <em>Clostridioides difficile</em> antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in veterinary medicine across various animal species and related sources. The analysis included studies that presented data on antimicrobial susceptibility testing using the <em>E</em>-test, agar dilution, or broth microdilution techniques. The extracted data included minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and a comprehensive characterization analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 1582 studies were identified in scientific databases, of which only 80 were subjected to analysis. The research on <em>Clostridioides difficile</em> antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in veterinary medicine is most prolific in Europe and North America. The majority of isolates originate from production animals (55%) and pets (15%), with pigs, horses, and cattle being the most commonly studied species. The tested agents' minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and resulting putative antimicrobial resistance profiles exhibited considerable diversity across animal species and sources of isolation. Additionally, AMR characterization has been conducted at the gene and genomic level in animal strains. The <em>E</em>-test was the most frequently utilized method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). Furthermore, the breakpoints for interpreting the MICs were found to be highly heterogeneous and frequently observed regardless of the geographical origin of the publication.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Antimicrobial susceptibility testing techniques and results were found to be diverse and heterogeneous. There is no evidence of an exclusive antimicrobial resistance pattern in any animal species. Despite the phenotypic and genomic data collected over the years, further interdisciplinary studies are necessary. Our findings underscore the necessity for international collaboration to establish uniform standards for <em>C. difficile</em> antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) methods and reporting. Such collaboration would facilitate a “One Health” approach to surveillance and control, which is of paramount importance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19577,"journal":{"name":"One Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352771424001861/pdfft?md5=bbf53ba98e45a87213e89573449fe5c5&pid=1-s2.0-S2352771424001861-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial resistance of Clostridioides difficile in veterinary medicine around the world: A scoping review of minimum inhibitory concentrations\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100860\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To provide a comprehensive characterization of <em>Clostridioides difficile</em> antimicrobial resistance (AMR) data in veterinary medicine based on the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of all antimicrobial agents tested in relation to the techniques used.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and its associated checklist. The objective was to provide a synthesis of the evidence in a summarized and analyzed format.</p><p>To this end, three scientific databases were consulted: Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science, up until December 2021. Subsequently, all identified literature was subjected to screening and classification in accordance with the established study criteria, with the objective of subsequent evaluation.</p></div><div><h3>Study selection and data extraction</h3><p>A comprehensive analysis was conducted on studies regarding <em>Clostridioides difficile</em> antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in veterinary medicine across various animal species and related sources. The analysis included studies that presented data on antimicrobial susceptibility testing using the <em>E</em>-test, agar dilution, or broth microdilution techniques. The extracted data included minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and a comprehensive characterization analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 1582 studies were identified in scientific databases, of which only 80 were subjected to analysis. The research on <em>Clostridioides difficile</em> antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in veterinary medicine is most prolific in Europe and North America. The majority of isolates originate from production animals (55%) and pets (15%), with pigs, horses, and cattle being the most commonly studied species. The tested agents' minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and resulting putative antimicrobial resistance profiles exhibited considerable diversity across animal species and sources of isolation. Additionally, AMR characterization has been conducted at the gene and genomic level in animal strains. The <em>E</em>-test was the most frequently utilized method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). Furthermore, the breakpoints for interpreting the MICs were found to be highly heterogeneous and frequently observed regardless of the geographical origin of the publication.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Antimicrobial susceptibility testing techniques and results were found to be diverse and heterogeneous. There is no evidence of an exclusive antimicrobial resistance pattern in any animal species. Despite the phenotypic and genomic data collected over the years, further interdisciplinary studies are necessary. Our findings underscore the necessity for international collaboration to establish uniform standards for <em>C. difficile</em> antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) methods and reporting. Such collaboration would facilitate a “One Health” approach to surveillance and control, which is of paramount importance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"One Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352771424001861/pdfft?md5=bbf53ba98e45a87213e89573449fe5c5&pid=1-s2.0-S2352771424001861-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"One Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352771424001861\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352771424001861","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据与所用技术相关的所有抗菌剂测试的最低抑菌浓度 (MIC),提供兽医抗菌剂耐药性 (AMR) 数据的综合特征。根据系统综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)扩展范围综述(PRISMA-ScR)及其相关清单进行了系统范围综述。目的是以总结和分析的形式提供证据综述。我们对不同动物物种和相关来源的兽医抗菌药耐药性(AMR)研究进行了综合分析。分析包括使用-试验、琼脂稀释或肉汤微量稀释技术进行抗菌药敏感性测试的研究数据。提取的数据包括最低抑菌浓度 (MIC) 值和综合特性分析。在科学数据库中共找到 1582 项研究,其中只有 80 项进行了分析。兽医抗菌药耐药性(AMR)研究在欧洲和北美最为活跃。大多数分离物来自生产动物(55%)和宠物(15%),其中猪、马和牛是最常被研究的物种。受测制剂的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)和由此产生的假定抗菌药耐药性特征在不同动物种类和分离来源中表现出相当大的多样性。此外,还对动物菌株的基因和基因组水平进行了 AMR 鉴定。-试验是最常用的抗菌药物敏感性试验(AST)方法。此外,还发现用于解释 MIC 的断点具有高度异质性,并且经常被观察到,与出版物的地理来源无关。抗菌药物药敏试验的技术和结果也存在多样性和差异性。没有证据表明在任何动物物种中都存在唯一的抗菌药耐药性模式。尽管多年来收集了大量表型和基因组数据,但仍有必要开展进一步的跨学科研究。我们的研究结果突出表明,有必要开展国际合作,建立统一的抗菌药敏感性检测(AST)方法和报告标准。这种合作将有助于采用 "统一健康 "方法进行监测和控制,这一点至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antimicrobial resistance of Clostridioides difficile in veterinary medicine around the world: A scoping review of minimum inhibitory concentrations

Objective

To provide a comprehensive characterization of Clostridioides difficile antimicrobial resistance (AMR) data in veterinary medicine based on the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of all antimicrobial agents tested in relation to the techniques used.

Methods

A systematic scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and its associated checklist. The objective was to provide a synthesis of the evidence in a summarized and analyzed format.

To this end, three scientific databases were consulted: Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science, up until December 2021. Subsequently, all identified literature was subjected to screening and classification in accordance with the established study criteria, with the objective of subsequent evaluation.

Study selection and data extraction

A comprehensive analysis was conducted on studies regarding Clostridioides difficile antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in veterinary medicine across various animal species and related sources. The analysis included studies that presented data on antimicrobial susceptibility testing using the E-test, agar dilution, or broth microdilution techniques. The extracted data included minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and a comprehensive characterization analysis.

Results

A total of 1582 studies were identified in scientific databases, of which only 80 were subjected to analysis. The research on Clostridioides difficile antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in veterinary medicine is most prolific in Europe and North America. The majority of isolates originate from production animals (55%) and pets (15%), with pigs, horses, and cattle being the most commonly studied species. The tested agents' minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and resulting putative antimicrobial resistance profiles exhibited considerable diversity across animal species and sources of isolation. Additionally, AMR characterization has been conducted at the gene and genomic level in animal strains. The E-test was the most frequently utilized method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). Furthermore, the breakpoints for interpreting the MICs were found to be highly heterogeneous and frequently observed regardless of the geographical origin of the publication.

Conclusions

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing techniques and results were found to be diverse and heterogeneous. There is no evidence of an exclusive antimicrobial resistance pattern in any animal species. Despite the phenotypic and genomic data collected over the years, further interdisciplinary studies are necessary. Our findings underscore the necessity for international collaboration to establish uniform standards for C. difficile antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) methods and reporting. Such collaboration would facilitate a “One Health” approach to surveillance and control, which is of paramount importance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
One Health
One Health Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: One Health - a Gold Open Access journal. The mission of One Health is to provide a platform for rapid communication of high quality scientific knowledge on inter- and intra-species pathogen transmission, bringing together leading experts in virology, bacteriology, parasitology, mycology, vectors and vector-borne diseases, tropical health, veterinary sciences, pathology, immunology, food safety, mathematical modelling, epidemiology, public health research and emergency preparedness. As a Gold Open Access journal, a fee is payable on acceptance of the paper. Please see the Guide for Authors for more information. Submissions to the following categories are welcome: Virology, Bacteriology, Parasitology, Mycology, Vectors and vector-borne diseases, Co-infections and co-morbidities, Disease spatial surveillance, Modelling, Tropical Health, Discovery, Ecosystem Health, Public Health.
期刊最新文献
Tick-borne viruses: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and animal models A 15-day pilot biodiversity intervention with horses in a farm system leads to gut microbiome rewilding in 10 urban Italian children Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from treated municipal wastewaters and Black-headed Gull nestlings on the recipient river How policy advocacy promotes regulated antibiotic use: Evidence from meat duck farmers of China The antimicrobial resistance landscape of slaughterhouses in western Kenya: A microbiological case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1