巴西半干旱地区当前和未来气候条件下香蕉的碳足迹和缺水足迹

IF 4.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Development Pub Date : 2024-07-20 DOI:10.1016/j.envdev.2024.101034
Antonio Fabio da Silva Lima , Viviane da Silva Barros , Alexsandro Oliveira da Silva , Rubens Sonsol Gondim , Maria Cléa Brito de Figueirêdo , Raimundo Nonato Távora Costa , Claudivan Feitosa de Lacerda , Jonnathan Richeds da Silva Sales , Enio Farias de França e Silva
{"title":"巴西半干旱地区当前和未来气候条件下香蕉的碳足迹和缺水足迹","authors":"Antonio Fabio da Silva Lima ,&nbsp;Viviane da Silva Barros ,&nbsp;Alexsandro Oliveira da Silva ,&nbsp;Rubens Sonsol Gondim ,&nbsp;Maria Cléa Brito de Figueirêdo ,&nbsp;Raimundo Nonato Távora Costa ,&nbsp;Claudivan Feitosa de Lacerda ,&nbsp;Jonnathan Richeds da Silva Sales ,&nbsp;Enio Farias de França e Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2024.101034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Climate change has become a global threat and a cause of uncertainty for numerous economic sectors, particularly agriculture. Several studies addressing the impacts of climate change can be found in the literature; however, studies on strategies to improve sustainability in orchards are scarce. Bananas are of great economic importance in tropical regions, and their production is characterized by high consumption of natural resources, increasing greenhouse gas emissions and environmental impacts. This study aimed to identify critical points in banana production, understand how they influence future footprints, and develop strategies to reduce current footprints. Life cycle assessment was used to estimate water scarcity (ISO 14046) and carbon (ISO 14067) footprints. Results are presented per 1 kg of banana. Primary data from 10-year averages were collected from farms located in the Lower Jaguaribe sub-basin. The results revealed that the carbon footprint ranged from 0.21 to 0.84 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq kg<sup>−1</sup> in 2023, whereas the water scarcity footprint reached 1441 m<sup>3</sup> eq kg<sup>−1</sup>. Under the current scenario, yield improvement could reduce carbon footprint by up to 57.9%, and greater efficiency in water use could decrease water footprint by up to 77%. In 2055, projections suggest that improvements in irrigation could lead to reductions of 5% in carbon footprint and 24.9% in water scarcity footprint. The findings of this study highlight the importance of adopting a sustainable approach to banana production, emphasizing the need to improve natural resource management and promote conscious agricultural practices, such as no-till farming and polyculture, which favor carbon sequestration. The use of plants that perform biological nitrogen fixation can reduce the need for nitrogen fertilizers, in alignment with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Public policies focused on providing technical assistance to farmers are crucial for achieving environmentally sustainable production and enhancing resilience to climate change and water scarcity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54269,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Development","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 101034"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon and water scarcity footprints of banana under current and future climate conditions in the Brazilian semiarid region\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Fabio da Silva Lima ,&nbsp;Viviane da Silva Barros ,&nbsp;Alexsandro Oliveira da Silva ,&nbsp;Rubens Sonsol Gondim ,&nbsp;Maria Cléa Brito de Figueirêdo ,&nbsp;Raimundo Nonato Távora Costa ,&nbsp;Claudivan Feitosa de Lacerda ,&nbsp;Jonnathan Richeds da Silva Sales ,&nbsp;Enio Farias de França e Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envdev.2024.101034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Climate change has become a global threat and a cause of uncertainty for numerous economic sectors, particularly agriculture. Several studies addressing the impacts of climate change can be found in the literature; however, studies on strategies to improve sustainability in orchards are scarce. Bananas are of great economic importance in tropical regions, and their production is characterized by high consumption of natural resources, increasing greenhouse gas emissions and environmental impacts. This study aimed to identify critical points in banana production, understand how they influence future footprints, and develop strategies to reduce current footprints. Life cycle assessment was used to estimate water scarcity (ISO 14046) and carbon (ISO 14067) footprints. Results are presented per 1 kg of banana. Primary data from 10-year averages were collected from farms located in the Lower Jaguaribe sub-basin. The results revealed that the carbon footprint ranged from 0.21 to 0.84 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq kg<sup>−1</sup> in 2023, whereas the water scarcity footprint reached 1441 m<sup>3</sup> eq kg<sup>−1</sup>. Under the current scenario, yield improvement could reduce carbon footprint by up to 57.9%, and greater efficiency in water use could decrease water footprint by up to 77%. In 2055, projections suggest that improvements in irrigation could lead to reductions of 5% in carbon footprint and 24.9% in water scarcity footprint. The findings of this study highlight the importance of adopting a sustainable approach to banana production, emphasizing the need to improve natural resource management and promote conscious agricultural practices, such as no-till farming and polyculture, which favor carbon sequestration. The use of plants that perform biological nitrogen fixation can reduce the need for nitrogen fertilizers, in alignment with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Public policies focused on providing technical assistance to farmers are crucial for achieving environmentally sustainable production and enhancing resilience to climate change and water scarcity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Development\",\"volume\":\"51 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101034\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464524000721\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464524000721","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气候变化已成为一个全球性威胁,也是众多经济部门,尤其是农业部门面临的一个不确定因素。在文献中可以找到一些关于气候变化影响的研究;然而,关于提高果园可持续性战略的研究却很少。香蕉在热带地区具有重要的经济意义,其生产的特点是自然资源消耗量大,温室气体排放量和环境影响不断增加。本研究旨在确定香蕉生产的关键点,了解这些关键点如何影响未来的足迹,并制定减少当前足迹的战略。生命周期评估用于估算缺水(ISO 14046)和碳(ISO 14067)足迹。结果以每 1 千克香蕉计算。从位于下贾瓜里贝子流域的农场收集了 10 年平均值的原始数据。结果显示,2023 年的碳足迹范围为 0.21 至 0.84 千克二氧化碳当量千克,而缺水足迹则达到 1441 米当量千克。在当前情况下,提高产量可减少碳足迹达 57.9%,提高用水效率可减少水足迹达 77%。预测表明,2055 年,灌溉的改善可使碳足迹减少 5%,缺水足迹减少 24.9%。这项研究的结果突出了采用可持续方法生产香蕉的重要性,强调了改善自然资源管理和推广有意识的农业实践的必要性,如有利于碳固存的免耕耕作和多元栽培。使用具有生物固氮功能的植物可以减少对氮肥的需求,这与 2030 年可持续发展议程相一致。以向农民提供技术援助为重点的公共政策,对于实现环境可持续生产以及提高应对气候变化和水资源短缺的能力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Carbon and water scarcity footprints of banana under current and future climate conditions in the Brazilian semiarid region

Climate change has become a global threat and a cause of uncertainty for numerous economic sectors, particularly agriculture. Several studies addressing the impacts of climate change can be found in the literature; however, studies on strategies to improve sustainability in orchards are scarce. Bananas are of great economic importance in tropical regions, and their production is characterized by high consumption of natural resources, increasing greenhouse gas emissions and environmental impacts. This study aimed to identify critical points in banana production, understand how they influence future footprints, and develop strategies to reduce current footprints. Life cycle assessment was used to estimate water scarcity (ISO 14046) and carbon (ISO 14067) footprints. Results are presented per 1 kg of banana. Primary data from 10-year averages were collected from farms located in the Lower Jaguaribe sub-basin. The results revealed that the carbon footprint ranged from 0.21 to 0.84 kg CO2 eq kg−1 in 2023, whereas the water scarcity footprint reached 1441 m3 eq kg−1. Under the current scenario, yield improvement could reduce carbon footprint by up to 57.9%, and greater efficiency in water use could decrease water footprint by up to 77%. In 2055, projections suggest that improvements in irrigation could lead to reductions of 5% in carbon footprint and 24.9% in water scarcity footprint. The findings of this study highlight the importance of adopting a sustainable approach to banana production, emphasizing the need to improve natural resource management and promote conscious agricultural practices, such as no-till farming and polyculture, which favor carbon sequestration. The use of plants that perform biological nitrogen fixation can reduce the need for nitrogen fertilizers, in alignment with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Public policies focused on providing technical assistance to farmers are crucial for achieving environmentally sustainable production and enhancing resilience to climate change and water scarcity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Development
Environmental Development Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
62
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Development provides a future oriented, pro-active, authoritative source of information and learning for researchers, postgraduate students, policymakers, and managers, and bridges the gap between fundamental research and the application in management and policy practices. It stimulates the exchange and coupling of traditional scientific knowledge on the environment, with the experiential knowledge among decision makers and other stakeholders and also connects natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences. Environmental Development includes and promotes scientific work from the non-western world, and also strengthens the collaboration between the developed and developing world. Further it links environmental research to broader issues of economic and social-cultural developments, and is intended to shorten the delays between research and publication, while ensuring thorough peer review. Environmental Development also creates a forum for transnational communication, discussion and global action. Environmental Development is open to a broad range of disciplines and authors. The journal welcomes, in particular, contributions from a younger generation of researchers, and papers expanding the frontiers of environmental sciences, pointing at new directions and innovative answers. All submissions to Environmental Development are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, which are in keeping with the journal''s aims and scope.
期刊最新文献
Spatiotemporal changes and management measure to enhance ecosystem services in the Mongolian Plateau The role of agriculture for achieving renewable energy-centered sustainable development objectives in rural Africa Navigating environmental fragility: (Mal)coping and adaptation strategies in the socio-environmental system of the Mtendeli Refugee Camp, Tanzania Interrelated drivers of migration intentions in Africa: Evidence from Afrobarometer surveys From green to regenerative supply chain management in construction: Towards a conceptual framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1