成对在线实验室评估:形成性参与和总结性成就

IF 2.5 3区 教育学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Chemical Education Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00308
Emily Coyte, Roy B Lowry
{"title":"成对在线实验室评估:形成性参与和总结性成就","authors":"Emily Coyte, Roy B Lowry","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Laboratory assessments are important parts of chemistry higher education, but students are not always given opportunities to formatively develop their understanding and skills before taking summative tasks in this area. This report describes the use of formative–summative paired chemistry laboratory assessments in gravimetric analysis and titration practicals and demonstrates an association between student engagement with formative online assessments and summative attainment. The laboratory assessments described here use Smart Worksheet technology, a customizable resource type which handles chained calculations, concept questions, and quality of data checks. The Smart Worksheets are autograded to support student learning without increasing staff marking burden and can provide immediate feedback and multiple attempts for each question to close the learning loop, plus a built-in timeline mode for reviewing student journeys through the resource. These resources were implemented in aligned formative–summative pairs to provide students with a low-stakes practice of both the technology format and chemistry calculation, getting them familiar and managing expectations before module-mark bearing summative assessment. Student assessment data from six consecutive foundation year groups were collected (total <i>N</i> = 818). Approximately half of the students chose to engage with each optional formative resource, permitting comparison of student attainment by those who engaged versus those who did not. For both gravimetric analysis and titration pairs, students who engaged with the formative assessment scored significantly higher in the corresponding summative assessment. Additionally, students who engaged with both formative assessments scored significantly higher in midmodule and end of module tests than students who did not.","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paired Online Laboratory Assessments: Formative Engagement and Summative Attainment\",\"authors\":\"Emily Coyte, Roy B Lowry\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Laboratory assessments are important parts of chemistry higher education, but students are not always given opportunities to formatively develop their understanding and skills before taking summative tasks in this area. This report describes the use of formative–summative paired chemistry laboratory assessments in gravimetric analysis and titration practicals and demonstrates an association between student engagement with formative online assessments and summative attainment. The laboratory assessments described here use Smart Worksheet technology, a customizable resource type which handles chained calculations, concept questions, and quality of data checks. The Smart Worksheets are autograded to support student learning without increasing staff marking burden and can provide immediate feedback and multiple attempts for each question to close the learning loop, plus a built-in timeline mode for reviewing student journeys through the resource. These resources were implemented in aligned formative–summative pairs to provide students with a low-stakes practice of both the technology format and chemistry calculation, getting them familiar and managing expectations before module-mark bearing summative assessment. Student assessment data from six consecutive foundation year groups were collected (total <i>N</i> = 818). Approximately half of the students chose to engage with each optional formative resource, permitting comparison of student attainment by those who engaged versus those who did not. For both gravimetric analysis and titration pairs, students who engaged with the formative assessment scored significantly higher in the corresponding summative assessment. Additionally, students who engaged with both formative assessments scored significantly higher in midmodule and end of module tests than students who did not.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00308\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00308","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实验室评估是化学高等教育的重要组成部分,但学生在完成该领域的终结性任务之前,并不总是有机会形成性地发展自己的理解和技能。本报告介绍了在重量分析和滴定实践中使用形成性-总结性配对化学实验评估的情况,并证明了学生参与形成性在线评估与总结性成绩之间的关联。这里介绍的实验评估使用了智能工作表技术,这是一种可定制的资源类型,可处理连锁计算、概念问题和数据质量检查。智能工作表是自动分级的,以支持学生的学习,同时又不增加教职员工的批改负担,并能提供即时反馈和每个问题的多次尝试,以形成学习闭环,另外还有一个内置的时间轴模式,用于回顾学生的资源历程。这些资源以形成性和总结性相结合的方式实施,为学生提供技术格式和化学计算方面的低风险练习,让他们在进行有模块标记的总结性评估之前熟悉并管理期望值。我们收集了连续六个基础年级组的学生评估数据(总人数 = 818)。大约有一半的学生选择使用每种可选的形成性资源,这样就可以比较使用与未使用的学生的成绩。对于重力分析和滴定对,参与形成性评价的学生在相应的终结性评价中得分明显更高。此外,参与这两项形成性评估的学生在模块中期和模块结束测试中的得分也明显高于未参与的学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Paired Online Laboratory Assessments: Formative Engagement and Summative Attainment
Laboratory assessments are important parts of chemistry higher education, but students are not always given opportunities to formatively develop their understanding and skills before taking summative tasks in this area. This report describes the use of formative–summative paired chemistry laboratory assessments in gravimetric analysis and titration practicals and demonstrates an association between student engagement with formative online assessments and summative attainment. The laboratory assessments described here use Smart Worksheet technology, a customizable resource type which handles chained calculations, concept questions, and quality of data checks. The Smart Worksheets are autograded to support student learning without increasing staff marking burden and can provide immediate feedback and multiple attempts for each question to close the learning loop, plus a built-in timeline mode for reviewing student journeys through the resource. These resources were implemented in aligned formative–summative pairs to provide students with a low-stakes practice of both the technology format and chemistry calculation, getting them familiar and managing expectations before module-mark bearing summative assessment. Student assessment data from six consecutive foundation year groups were collected (total N = 818). Approximately half of the students chose to engage with each optional formative resource, permitting comparison of student attainment by those who engaged versus those who did not. For both gravimetric analysis and titration pairs, students who engaged with the formative assessment scored significantly higher in the corresponding summative assessment. Additionally, students who engaged with both formative assessments scored significantly higher in midmodule and end of module tests than students who did not.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Education
Journal of Chemical Education 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.
期刊最新文献
Issue Editorial Masthead Issue Publication Information Rapid and Facile Preparation of Carbon Tape Electrodes for the Evaluation of Metal Oxides as OER Catalysts In Situ Growth of COFs within Cork for Oil–Water Separation: A Comprehensive Chemistry Experiment for Undergraduates UFV Game: Creating a Fun Upgradeable Card Game to Engage Students in Learning Chemical Formula and Valence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1