不同的年份,(大部分)相同的报道:比较 Facebook 上发布的 2016 年和 2020 年大选新闻

IF 3.4 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1177/10776990241260832
Rebecca R. Donaway, David E. Silva, Myiah J. Hutchens
{"title":"不同的年份,(大部分)相同的报道:比较 Facebook 上发布的 2016 年和 2020 年大选新闻","authors":"Rebecca R. Donaway, David E. Silva, Myiah J. Hutchens","doi":"10.1177/10776990241260832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Presidential elections typically follow a consistent pattern of news coverage. After the 2016 election, the news media faced intense criticism, a process called metajournalistic discourse. This research seeks to understand how election coverage may have shifted in 2020 considering this public scrutiny. By conducting a quantitative content analysis of news posted on Facebook during the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential campaigns, we show that despite self-reflective calls to do better, much of the campaign coverage remained unchanged in 2020. Finally, we detail how election coverage from traditional, partisan, and online-first networks evolved (or not) between 2016 and 2020.","PeriodicalId":48095,"journal":{"name":"Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different Year, (Mostly) Same Coverage: Comparing the 2016 and 2020 Election News Posted on Facebook\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca R. Donaway, David E. Silva, Myiah J. Hutchens\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10776990241260832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Presidential elections typically follow a consistent pattern of news coverage. After the 2016 election, the news media faced intense criticism, a process called metajournalistic discourse. This research seeks to understand how election coverage may have shifted in 2020 considering this public scrutiny. By conducting a quantitative content analysis of news posted on Facebook during the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential campaigns, we show that despite self-reflective calls to do better, much of the campaign coverage remained unchanged in 2020. Finally, we detail how election coverage from traditional, partisan, and online-first networks evolved (or not) between 2016 and 2020.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990241260832\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990241260832","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

总统大选的新闻报道通常遵循一贯的模式。2016 年大选之后,新闻媒体面临着激烈的批评,这一过程被称为 "元新闻话语"。本研究试图了解,考虑到这种公众监督,2020 年的大选报道可能会发生怎样的转变。通过对 2016 年和 2020 年美国总统竞选期间在 Facebook 上发布的新闻进行定量内容分析,我们发现,尽管有自我反省要求做得更好,但大部分竞选报道在 2020 年仍保持不变。最后,我们详细介绍了传统网络、党派网络和网络优先网络的选举报道在 2016 年至 2020 年间是如何发展(或没有发展)的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Different Year, (Mostly) Same Coverage: Comparing the 2016 and 2020 Election News Posted on Facebook
Presidential elections typically follow a consistent pattern of news coverage. After the 2016 election, the news media faced intense criticism, a process called metajournalistic discourse. This research seeks to understand how election coverage may have shifted in 2020 considering this public scrutiny. By conducting a quantitative content analysis of news posted on Facebook during the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential campaigns, we show that despite self-reflective calls to do better, much of the campaign coverage remained unchanged in 2020. Finally, we detail how election coverage from traditional, partisan, and online-first networks evolved (or not) between 2016 and 2020.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly focuses on research in journalism and mass communication. Each issue features reports of original investigation, presenting the latest developments in theory and methodology of communication, international communication, journalism history, and social and legal problems. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly also contains book reviews. Refereed. Published four times a year.
期刊最新文献
The Perceptions of Nuclear War: The Imbalanced Co-Orientation Between Russian and American Youth The Effect of Interactivity in Immersive Journalism on Participating In the Media and Through the Media The Impact of the 2020 BLM Resurgence on the Racial Representations of Ads and Ad Evaluations: Analysis of Super Bowl Ads Book Review: The Handbook on Religion and Communication, by Yoel Cohen and Paul Soukup, eds Book Review: Life in Media. A Global Introduction to Media Studies, by Mark Deuze
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1