{"title":"衍射不变性与广义相对论","authors":"Max Heitmann","doi":"arxiv-2407.16702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diffeomorphism invariance is often considered to be a hallmark of the theory\nof general relativity (GR). But closer analysis reveals that this cannot be\nwhat makes GR distinctive. The concept of diffeomorphism invariance can be\ndefined in two ways: under the first definition (diff-invariance$_1$), both GR\nand all other classical spacetime theories turn out to be diffeomorphism\ninvariant, while under the second (diff-invariance$_2$), neither do. Confusion\nabout the matter can be traced to two sources. First, GR is sometimes\nerroneously thought to embody a \"general principle of relativity,\" which\nasserts the relativity of all states of motion, and from which it would follow\nthat GR must be diff-invariant$_2$. But GR embodies no such principle, and is\neasily seen to violate diff-invariance$_2$. Second, GR is unique among\nspacetime theories in requiring a general-covariant formulation, whereas other\nclassical spacetime theories are typically formulated with respect to a\npreferred class of global coordinate systems in which their dynamical equations\nsimplify. This makes GR's diffeomorphism invariance (in the sense of\ndiff-invariance$_1$) manifest, while in other spacetime theories it lies latent\n-- at least in their familiar formulations. I trace this difference back to the\nfact that the spacetime structure is inhomogeneous within the models of GR, and\nmutable across its models. I offer a formal criterion for when a spacetime\ntheory possesses immutable spacetime structure, and using this criterion I\nprove that a theory possesses a preferred class of coordinate systems\napplicable across its models if and only if it possesses immutable spacetime\nstructure.","PeriodicalId":501190,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - General Physics","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diffeomorphism Invariance and General Relativity\",\"authors\":\"Max Heitmann\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2407.16702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Diffeomorphism invariance is often considered to be a hallmark of the theory\\nof general relativity (GR). But closer analysis reveals that this cannot be\\nwhat makes GR distinctive. The concept of diffeomorphism invariance can be\\ndefined in two ways: under the first definition (diff-invariance$_1$), both GR\\nand all other classical spacetime theories turn out to be diffeomorphism\\ninvariant, while under the second (diff-invariance$_2$), neither do. Confusion\\nabout the matter can be traced to two sources. First, GR is sometimes\\nerroneously thought to embody a \\\"general principle of relativity,\\\" which\\nasserts the relativity of all states of motion, and from which it would follow\\nthat GR must be diff-invariant$_2$. But GR embodies no such principle, and is\\neasily seen to violate diff-invariance$_2$. Second, GR is unique among\\nspacetime theories in requiring a general-covariant formulation, whereas other\\nclassical spacetime theories are typically formulated with respect to a\\npreferred class of global coordinate systems in which their dynamical equations\\nsimplify. This makes GR's diffeomorphism invariance (in the sense of\\ndiff-invariance$_1$) manifest, while in other spacetime theories it lies latent\\n-- at least in their familiar formulations. I trace this difference back to the\\nfact that the spacetime structure is inhomogeneous within the models of GR, and\\nmutable across its models. I offer a formal criterion for when a spacetime\\ntheory possesses immutable spacetime structure, and using this criterion I\\nprove that a theory possesses a preferred class of coordinate systems\\napplicable across its models if and only if it possesses immutable spacetime\\nstructure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - General Physics\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - General Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.16702\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - General Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.16702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
衍射不变性通常被认为是广义相对论(GR)的标志。但仔细分析就会发现,这并不是广义相对论与众不同之处。衍射不变性的概念有两种定义:根据第一种定义(衍射不变性$_1$),广义相对论和所有其他经典时空理论都是衍射不变的;而根据第二种定义(衍射不变性$_2$),广义相对论和所有其他经典时空理论都不是衍射不变的。关于这个问题的混乱可以追溯到两个方面。首先,《全球定位系统》有时被误认为体现了 "相对性一般原理",该原理断言所有运动状态都具有相对性,并由此推导出《全球定位系统》必须是差分不变的_2$。但是,GR 并没有体现这样的原则,而且很容易看出它违反了差分不变性$_2$。其次,GR 在时空理论中是独一无二的,因为它需要用广义协变来表述,而其他经典时空理论通常是根据一类首选的全局坐标系来表述的,在这类坐标系中,它们的动力学方程可以简化。这使得 GR 的差分不变性(在差分不变性$_1$ 的意义上)显而易见,而在其他时空理论中,它是潜在的--至少在它们熟悉的表述中是这样。我把这种差异追溯到这样一个事实,即时空结构在 GR 模型中是不均匀的,而在不同模型中是可变的。我为时空理论何时拥有不变的时空结构提供了一个形式化的标准,并利用这个标准证明,当且仅当一个理论拥有不变的时空结构时,它才拥有一类可适用于不同模型的优选坐标系。
Diffeomorphism invariance is often considered to be a hallmark of the theory
of general relativity (GR). But closer analysis reveals that this cannot be
what makes GR distinctive. The concept of diffeomorphism invariance can be
defined in two ways: under the first definition (diff-invariance$_1$), both GR
and all other classical spacetime theories turn out to be diffeomorphism
invariant, while under the second (diff-invariance$_2$), neither do. Confusion
about the matter can be traced to two sources. First, GR is sometimes
erroneously thought to embody a "general principle of relativity," which
asserts the relativity of all states of motion, and from which it would follow
that GR must be diff-invariant$_2$. But GR embodies no such principle, and is
easily seen to violate diff-invariance$_2$. Second, GR is unique among
spacetime theories in requiring a general-covariant formulation, whereas other
classical spacetime theories are typically formulated with respect to a
preferred class of global coordinate systems in which their dynamical equations
simplify. This makes GR's diffeomorphism invariance (in the sense of
diff-invariance$_1$) manifest, while in other spacetime theories it lies latent
-- at least in their familiar formulations. I trace this difference back to the
fact that the spacetime structure is inhomogeneous within the models of GR, and
mutable across its models. I offer a formal criterion for when a spacetime
theory possesses immutable spacetime structure, and using this criterion I
prove that a theory possesses a preferred class of coordinate systems
applicable across its models if and only if it possesses immutable spacetime
structure.