住院 COVID-19 患者的康复血浆和死亡率预测因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 10.9 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Clinical Microbiology and Infection Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1016/j.cmi.2024.07.020
Massimo Franchini, Mario Cruciani, Carlo Mengoli, Arturo Casadevall, Claudia Glingani, Michael J Joyner, Liise-Anne Pirofski, Jonathon W Senefeld, Shmuel Shoham, David J Sullivan, Matteo Zani, Daniele Focosi
{"title":"住院 COVID-19 患者的康复血浆和死亡率预测因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Massimo Franchini, Mario Cruciani, Carlo Mengoli, Arturo Casadevall, Claudia Glingani, Michael J Joyner, Liise-Anne Pirofski, Jonathon W Senefeld, Shmuel Shoham, David J Sullivan, Matteo Zani, Daniele Focosi","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2024.07.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Plasma collected from recovered patients with COVID-19 (COVID-19 convalescent plasma [CCP]) was the first antibody-based therapy employed to fight the COVID-19 pandemic. While the therapeutic effect of early administration of CCP in COVID-19 outpatients has been recognized, conflicting data exist regarding the efficacy of CCP administration in hospitalized patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the effect of CCP compared to placebo or standard treatment, and to evaluate whether time from onset of symptoms to treatment initiation influenced the effect.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Electronic databases were searched for studies published from January 2020 to January 2024.</p><p><strong>Study eligibility criteria: </strong>Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of CCP on COVID-19 mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Hospitalized patients with COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>CCP versus no CCP.</p><p><strong>Assessment of risk of bias: </strong>Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs.</p><p><strong>Methods of data synthesis: </strong>The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI for the pooled effect estimates of CCP treatment. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven RCTs were included, representing 18,877 hospitalized patients with COVID-19. When transfused within 7 days from symptom onset, CCP significantly reduced the risk of death compared to standard therapy or placebo (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61-0.95), while later CCP administration was not associated with a mortality benefit (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.90-1.06). The certainty of the evidence was graded as moderate. Meta-regression analysis demonstrated increasing mortality effects for longer interval to transfusion or worse initial clinical severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In-hospital transfusion of CCP within 7 days from symptom onset conferred a mortality benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":"1514-1522"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Convalescent plasma and predictors of mortality among hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Massimo Franchini, Mario Cruciani, Carlo Mengoli, Arturo Casadevall, Claudia Glingani, Michael J Joyner, Liise-Anne Pirofski, Jonathon W Senefeld, Shmuel Shoham, David J Sullivan, Matteo Zani, Daniele Focosi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cmi.2024.07.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Plasma collected from recovered patients with COVID-19 (COVID-19 convalescent plasma [CCP]) was the first antibody-based therapy employed to fight the COVID-19 pandemic. While the therapeutic effect of early administration of CCP in COVID-19 outpatients has been recognized, conflicting data exist regarding the efficacy of CCP administration in hospitalized patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the effect of CCP compared to placebo or standard treatment, and to evaluate whether time from onset of symptoms to treatment initiation influenced the effect.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Electronic databases were searched for studies published from January 2020 to January 2024.</p><p><strong>Study eligibility criteria: </strong>Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of CCP on COVID-19 mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Hospitalized patients with COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>CCP versus no CCP.</p><p><strong>Assessment of risk of bias: </strong>Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs.</p><p><strong>Methods of data synthesis: </strong>The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI for the pooled effect estimates of CCP treatment. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven RCTs were included, representing 18,877 hospitalized patients with COVID-19. When transfused within 7 days from symptom onset, CCP significantly reduced the risk of death compared to standard therapy or placebo (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61-0.95), while later CCP administration was not associated with a mortality benefit (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.90-1.06). The certainty of the evidence was graded as moderate. Meta-regression analysis demonstrated increasing mortality effects for longer interval to transfusion or worse initial clinical severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In-hospital transfusion of CCP within 7 days from symptom onset conferred a mortality benefit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1514-1522\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2024.07.020\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2024.07.020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:从COVID-19康复患者身上收集的血浆(COVID-19康复血浆,CCP)是抗击COVID-19大流行的第一种抗体疗法。虽然早期使用 CCP 对 COVID-19 门诊病人的治疗效果已得到认可,但对住院病人使用 CCP 的疗效却存在相互矛盾的数据:研究 CCP 与安慰剂或标准治疗相比的疗效,并评估从症状出现到开始治疗的时间是否会影响疗效:研究资格标准:随机临床试验(RCT):调查CCP对住院COVID-19患者COVID-19死亡率影响的随机临床试验(RCT):干预措施:干预措施:CCP与不使用CCP。偏倚风险评估:方法:数据综合:采用随机效应模型计算CCP治疗的集合效应估计值的集合风险比(RR)及95% CI。采用 "建议评估、制定和评价分级法 "评估证据的确定性:结果:共纳入 27 项 RCT,代表了 18,877 名住院的 COVID-19 患者。与标准疗法或安慰剂相比,在症状出现后 7 天内输注 CCP 可显著降低死亡风险(RR 0.76,95% CI 0.61-0.95),而晚些时候输注 CCP 与死亡率获益无关(RR 0.98,95% CI 0.90-1.06)。证据的确定性被评为中等。Meta回归分析表明,输血间隔时间越长或初始临床严重程度越差,死亡率越高:结论:在症状出现后 7 天内进行 CCP 院内输血可降低死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Convalescent plasma and predictors of mortality among hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Plasma collected from recovered patients with COVID-19 (COVID-19 convalescent plasma [CCP]) was the first antibody-based therapy employed to fight the COVID-19 pandemic. While the therapeutic effect of early administration of CCP in COVID-19 outpatients has been recognized, conflicting data exist regarding the efficacy of CCP administration in hospitalized patients.

Objectives: To examine the effect of CCP compared to placebo or standard treatment, and to evaluate whether time from onset of symptoms to treatment initiation influenced the effect.

Data sources: Electronic databases were searched for studies published from January 2020 to January 2024.

Study eligibility criteria: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of CCP on COVID-19 mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Participants: Hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Interventions: CCP versus no CCP.

Assessment of risk of bias: Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs.

Methods of data synthesis: The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI for the pooled effect estimates of CCP treatment. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence.

Results: Twenty-seven RCTs were included, representing 18,877 hospitalized patients with COVID-19. When transfused within 7 days from symptom onset, CCP significantly reduced the risk of death compared to standard therapy or placebo (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61-0.95), while later CCP administration was not associated with a mortality benefit (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.90-1.06). The certainty of the evidence was graded as moderate. Meta-regression analysis demonstrated increasing mortality effects for longer interval to transfusion or worse initial clinical severity.

Conclusions: In-hospital transfusion of CCP within 7 days from symptom onset conferred a mortality benefit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
期刊最新文献
Acute cough in outpatients: what causes it, how long does it last, and how severe is it for different viruses and bacteria? Clinical Microbiology and Infection: how did we do in 2023? Healthcare-seeking behaviour preceding diagnosis of Lyme neuroborreliosis: population-based nationwide matched nested case-control study. COVID-19 surge during summer 2024: the phantom menace? Impact of susceptible, increased exposure, a new definition of the former intermediate susceptibility category, introduced by the European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing on antimicrobial susceptibility testing evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1