住院 COVID-19 患者的康复血浆和死亡率预测因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Clinical Microbiology and Infection Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1016/j.cmi.2024.07.020
Massimo Franchini , Mario Cruciani , Carlo Mengoli , Arturo Casadevall , Claudia Glingani , Michael J. Joyner , Liise-anne Pirofski , Jonathon W. Senefeld , Shmuel Shoham , David J. Sullivan , Matteo Zani , Daniele Focosi
{"title":"住院 COVID-19 患者的康复血浆和死亡率预测因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Massimo Franchini ,&nbsp;Mario Cruciani ,&nbsp;Carlo Mengoli ,&nbsp;Arturo Casadevall ,&nbsp;Claudia Glingani ,&nbsp;Michael J. Joyner ,&nbsp;Liise-anne Pirofski ,&nbsp;Jonathon W. Senefeld ,&nbsp;Shmuel Shoham ,&nbsp;David J. Sullivan ,&nbsp;Matteo Zani ,&nbsp;Daniele Focosi","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2024.07.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Plasma collected from recovered patients with COVID-19 (COVID-19 convalescent plasma [CCP]) was the first antibody-based therapy employed to fight the COVID-19 pandemic. While the therapeutic effect of early administration of CCP in COVID-19 outpatients has been recognized, conflicting data exist regarding the efficacy of CCP administration in hospitalized patients.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To examine the effect of CCP compared to placebo or standard treatment, and to evaluate whether time from onset of symptoms to treatment initiation influenced the effect.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>Electronic databases were searched for studies published from January 2020 to January 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Study eligibility criteria</h3><div>Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of CCP on COVID-19 mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Hospitalized patients with COVID-19.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>CCP versus no CCP.</div></div><div><h3>Assessment of risk of bias</h3><div>Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods of data synthesis</h3><div>The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI for the pooled effect estimates of CCP treatment. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-seven RCTs were included, representing 18,877 hospitalized patients with COVID-19. When transfused within 7 days from symptom onset, CCP significantly reduced the risk of death compared to standard therapy or placebo (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61–0.95), while later CCP administration was not associated with a mortality benefit (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.90–1.06). The certainty of the evidence was graded as moderate. Meta-regression analysis demonstrated increasing mortality effects for longer interval to transfusion or worse initial clinical severity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In-hospital transfusion of CCP within 7 days from symptom onset conferred a mortality benefit.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":"30 12","pages":"Pages 1514-1522"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Convalescent plasma and predictors of mortality among hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Massimo Franchini ,&nbsp;Mario Cruciani ,&nbsp;Carlo Mengoli ,&nbsp;Arturo Casadevall ,&nbsp;Claudia Glingani ,&nbsp;Michael J. Joyner ,&nbsp;Liise-anne Pirofski ,&nbsp;Jonathon W. Senefeld ,&nbsp;Shmuel Shoham ,&nbsp;David J. Sullivan ,&nbsp;Matteo Zani ,&nbsp;Daniele Focosi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cmi.2024.07.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Plasma collected from recovered patients with COVID-19 (COVID-19 convalescent plasma [CCP]) was the first antibody-based therapy employed to fight the COVID-19 pandemic. While the therapeutic effect of early administration of CCP in COVID-19 outpatients has been recognized, conflicting data exist regarding the efficacy of CCP administration in hospitalized patients.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To examine the effect of CCP compared to placebo or standard treatment, and to evaluate whether time from onset of symptoms to treatment initiation influenced the effect.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>Electronic databases were searched for studies published from January 2020 to January 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Study eligibility criteria</h3><div>Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of CCP on COVID-19 mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Hospitalized patients with COVID-19.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>CCP versus no CCP.</div></div><div><h3>Assessment of risk of bias</h3><div>Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods of data synthesis</h3><div>The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI for the pooled effect estimates of CCP treatment. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-seven RCTs were included, representing 18,877 hospitalized patients with COVID-19. When transfused within 7 days from symptom onset, CCP significantly reduced the risk of death compared to standard therapy or placebo (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61–0.95), while later CCP administration was not associated with a mortality benefit (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.90–1.06). The certainty of the evidence was graded as moderate. Meta-regression analysis demonstrated increasing mortality effects for longer interval to transfusion or worse initial clinical severity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In-hospital transfusion of CCP within 7 days from symptom onset conferred a mortality benefit.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"volume\":\"30 12\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1514-1522\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1198743X24003537\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1198743X24003537","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:从COVID-19康复患者身上收集的血浆(COVID-19康复血浆,CCP)是抗击COVID-19大流行的第一种抗体疗法。虽然早期使用 CCP 对 COVID-19 门诊病人的治疗效果已得到认可,但对住院病人使用 CCP 的疗效却存在相互矛盾的数据:研究 CCP 与安慰剂或标准治疗相比的疗效,并评估从症状出现到开始治疗的时间是否会影响疗效:研究资格标准:随机临床试验(RCT):调查CCP对住院COVID-19患者COVID-19死亡率影响的随机临床试验(RCT):干预措施:干预措施:CCP与不使用CCP。偏倚风险评估:方法:数据综合:采用随机效应模型计算CCP治疗的集合效应估计值的集合风险比(RR)及95% CI。采用 "建议评估、制定和评价分级法 "评估证据的确定性:结果:共纳入 27 项 RCT,代表了 18,877 名住院的 COVID-19 患者。与标准疗法或安慰剂相比,在症状出现后 7 天内输注 CCP 可显著降低死亡风险(RR 0.76,95% CI 0.61-0.95),而晚些时候输注 CCP 与死亡率获益无关(RR 0.98,95% CI 0.90-1.06)。证据的确定性被评为中等。Meta回归分析表明,输血间隔时间越长或初始临床严重程度越差,死亡率越高:结论:在症状出现后 7 天内进行 CCP 院内输血可降低死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Convalescent plasma and predictors of mortality among hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Plasma collected from recovered patients with COVID-19 (COVID-19 convalescent plasma [CCP]) was the first antibody-based therapy employed to fight the COVID-19 pandemic. While the therapeutic effect of early administration of CCP in COVID-19 outpatients has been recognized, conflicting data exist regarding the efficacy of CCP administration in hospitalized patients.

Objectives

To examine the effect of CCP compared to placebo or standard treatment, and to evaluate whether time from onset of symptoms to treatment initiation influenced the effect.

Data sources

Electronic databases were searched for studies published from January 2020 to January 2024.

Study eligibility criteria

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of CCP on COVID-19 mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Participants

Hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Interventions

CCP versus no CCP.

Assessment of risk of bias

Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs.

Methods of data synthesis

The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI for the pooled effect estimates of CCP treatment. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence.

Results

Twenty-seven RCTs were included, representing 18,877 hospitalized patients with COVID-19. When transfused within 7 days from symptom onset, CCP significantly reduced the risk of death compared to standard therapy or placebo (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61–0.95), while later CCP administration was not associated with a mortality benefit (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.90–1.06). The certainty of the evidence was graded as moderate. Meta-regression analysis demonstrated increasing mortality effects for longer interval to transfusion or worse initial clinical severity.

Conclusions

In-hospital transfusion of CCP within 7 days from symptom onset conferred a mortality benefit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
期刊最新文献
A hard tick on the scalp visualized by polarized and ultraviolet dermoscopy Faecal colonization with extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in rural Burkina Faso From compliance to complexity: the impact of in vitro diagnostic regulation for clinical microbiology laboratories The role of the gut microbiome in multidrug-resistant organism colonization and infection A phase Ib, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of the Ebolavirus DNA vaccine candidate INO-4201 followed by electroporation as booster vaccination in healthy, rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP-primed volunteers (Boost-EBOV)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1