{"title":"口头和书面信息对青少年正畸患者疼痛感和镇痛药用量的影响：随机对照试验。","authors":"Andrej Pavlić, Tadeja Blagec, Senka Meštrović","doi":"10.1177/14653125241264295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the impact of written instructions, about post-bonding pain, on patients' pain perception and analgesic consumption and to evaluate the correlation of pain with personality types.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Two-arm parallel randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants included adolescents in the permanent dentition with mild or moderate crowding.</p><p><strong>Randomisation: </strong>The participants were randomly allocated, using computer-generated random list, into two groups.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>After bonding and archwire insertion, all participants received oral instructions on potential pain occurrence and pain control. Participants in the study group also received written information on post-bonding pain.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Pain intensity was evaluated using the Numerical Rating Scale immediately after (T0), 2 days (T1) and 7 days (T2) after the placement of the fixed orthodontic appliance. Analgesic consumption was assessed as yes or no, and personality traits were assessed using the Big Five Inventory. Operators who scored pain intensity and recorded analgesic consumption and personality traits were blinded to the group allocation. Statistical analyses included the <i>t</i>-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, Spearman correlations and stepwise regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest rate of pain was recorded at T1 (<i>P</i> < 0.001). No statistically significant difference in pain perception between groups was observed. There was no statistically significant difference in analgesic consumption between the two groups (<i>P</i> = 0.81). The correlations between personality traits and pain perception were not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The additional written information had little impact on pain perception, and it had no relationship to personality types. The perception of pain and analgesic consumption were not affected by the provision of additional written information (<i>P</i> = 0.81). Participants' personality types did not affect the impact of the information given.</p>","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of verbal and written information on the perception of pain and analgesic consumption, in adolescent orthodontic patients: A randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Andrej Pavlić, Tadeja Blagec, Senka Meštrović\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14653125241264295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the impact of written instructions, about post-bonding pain, on patients' pain perception and analgesic consumption and to evaluate the correlation of pain with personality types.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Two-arm parallel randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants included adolescents in the permanent dentition with mild or moderate crowding.</p><p><strong>Randomisation: </strong>The participants were randomly allocated, using computer-generated random list, into two groups.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>After bonding and archwire insertion, all participants received oral instructions on potential pain occurrence and pain control. Participants in the study group also received written information on post-bonding pain.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Pain intensity was evaluated using the Numerical Rating Scale immediately after (T0), 2 days (T1) and 7 days (T2) after the placement of the fixed orthodontic appliance. Analgesic consumption was assessed as yes or no, and personality traits were assessed using the Big Five Inventory. Operators who scored pain intensity and recorded analgesic consumption and personality traits were blinded to the group allocation. Statistical analyses included the <i>t</i>-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, Spearman correlations and stepwise regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest rate of pain was recorded at T1 (<i>P</i> < 0.001). No statistically significant difference in pain perception between groups was observed. There was no statistically significant difference in analgesic consumption between the two groups (<i>P</i> = 0.81). The correlations between personality traits and pain perception were not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The additional written information had little impact on pain perception, and it had no relationship to personality types. The perception of pain and analgesic consumption were not affected by the provision of additional written information (<i>P</i> = 0.81). Participants' personality types did not affect the impact of the information given.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthodontics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14653125241264295\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14653125241264295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要研究有关结合后疼痛的书面说明对患者疼痛感知和镇痛药用量的影响，并评估疼痛与人格类型的相关性：双臂平行随机对照试验：萨格勒布大学医院中心，克罗地亚萨格勒布：参与者包括恒牙列轻度或中度拥挤的青少年：采用计算机生成的随机名单将参与者随机分配到两组：粘接和安装弓丝后，所有参与者都接受了关于可能发生的疼痛和疼痛控制的口头指导。研究组的参与者还收到了关于粘接后疼痛的书面信息：在粘接固定矫治器后立即（T0）、2 天（T1）和 7 天（T2）使用数字评级量表评估疼痛强度。镇痛剂消耗量以 "是 "或 "否 "进行评估，人格特质则使用 "大五量表 "进行评估。对疼痛强度进行评分并记录镇痛剂用量和个性特征的操作人员对组别分配是盲人。统计分析包括 t 检验、曼-惠特尼 U 检验、斯皮尔曼相关分析和逐步回归分析：T1组的疼痛发生率最高（P P = 0.81）。人格特质与疼痛感之间的相关性不显著：结论：额外的书面信息对疼痛感知的影响很小，而且与人格类型无关。提供额外的书面信息对疼痛的感知和镇痛剂的消耗没有影响（P = 0.81）。参与者的人格类型对所提供信息的影响没有影响。
Effect of verbal and written information on the perception of pain and analgesic consumption, in adolescent orthodontic patients: A randomised controlled trial.
Objective: To investigate the impact of written instructions, about post-bonding pain, on patients' pain perception and analgesic consumption and to evaluate the correlation of pain with personality types.
Setting: University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Methods: Participants included adolescents in the permanent dentition with mild or moderate crowding.
Randomisation: The participants were randomly allocated, using computer-generated random list, into two groups.
Interventions: After bonding and archwire insertion, all participants received oral instructions on potential pain occurrence and pain control. Participants in the study group also received written information on post-bonding pain.
Outcomes: Pain intensity was evaluated using the Numerical Rating Scale immediately after (T0), 2 days (T1) and 7 days (T2) after the placement of the fixed orthodontic appliance. Analgesic consumption was assessed as yes or no, and personality traits were assessed using the Big Five Inventory. Operators who scored pain intensity and recorded analgesic consumption and personality traits were blinded to the group allocation. Statistical analyses included the t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, Spearman correlations and stepwise regression analysis.
Results: The highest rate of pain was recorded at T1 (P < 0.001). No statistically significant difference in pain perception between groups was observed. There was no statistically significant difference in analgesic consumption between the two groups (P = 0.81). The correlations between personality traits and pain perception were not significant.
Conclusion: The additional written information had little impact on pain perception, and it had no relationship to personality types. The perception of pain and analgesic consumption were not affected by the provision of additional written information (P = 0.81). Participants' personality types did not affect the impact of the information given.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Orthodontics has an international circulation, publishing papers from throughout the world. The official journal of the British Orthodontic Society, it aims to publish high quality, evidence-based, clinically orientated or clinically relevant original research papers that will underpin evidence based orthodontic care. It particularly welcomes reports on prospective research into different treatment methods and techniques but also systematic reviews, meta-analyses and studies which will stimulate interest in new developments. Regular features include original papers on clinically relevant topics, clinical case reports, reviews of the orthodontic literature, editorials, book reviews, correspondence and other features of interest to the orthodontic community. The Journal is published in full colour throughout.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
