血管内再通术与开放性手术再通术作为动脉急性肠系膜缺血的首选策略:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2024.07.084
Yadong Shi, Boxiang Zhao, Yangyi Zhou, Liang Chen, Haobo Su, Jianping Gu
{"title":"血管内再通术与开放性手术再通术作为动脉急性肠系膜缺血的首选策略:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Yadong Shi, Boxiang Zhao, Yangyi Zhou, Liang Chen, Haobo Su, Jianping Gu","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.07.084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paired meta-analysis aimed to compare the mortality and morbidity of endovascular revascularization (EVR) and open surgical revascularization (OSR) as the first strategy for arterial acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. A systematic search strategy was performed to identify eligible studies using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library database from inception to December 31, 2023, with restriction to the English language. The end search date was January 2, 2024. The primary outcome was short-term mortality. Secondary outcomes included bowel resection, second-look laparotomy, and short bowel syndrome. The counterenhanced funnel plot and the Peters' test were used to assess bias. Outcomes were reported as odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) using the Mantel-Haenszel method. The GRADE classification was used to estimate the certainty of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 studies (1141 patients) comparing EVR vs OSR for arterial AMI were identified and analyzed. The mean patient age was 61.9 to 73.6 years and 45.1% of the patients were male. Compared with OSR, EVR as the first treatment may not decrease short-term mortality (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.50-1.25; P = .31; very low certainty) and second-look laparotomy (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.30-3.36; P = .99; very low certainty). However, EVR may be associated with decreased bowel resection (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.20-0.88; P = .022; very low certainty) and short bowel syndrome (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.21-0.75; P = .005; very low certainty). The metaregression revealed that the mortality regarding EVR vs OSR was not impacted significantly by thrombotic etiology (-0.002; 95% CI, -0.027 to 0.022; P = .85), whereas it was impacted significantly by publication year (0.076; 95% CI, 0.069-0.145; P = .031).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with OSR, EVR as the first treatment for arterial AMI may not decrease short-term mortality or second-look laparotomy. Future multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed urgently to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1883-1893.e2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endovascular revascularization vs open surgical revascularization as the first strategy for arterial acute mesenteric ischemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yadong Shi, Boxiang Zhao, Yangyi Zhou, Liang Chen, Haobo Su, Jianping Gu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.07.084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paired meta-analysis aimed to compare the mortality and morbidity of endovascular revascularization (EVR) and open surgical revascularization (OSR) as the first strategy for arterial acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. A systematic search strategy was performed to identify eligible studies using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library database from inception to December 31, 2023, with restriction to the English language. The end search date was January 2, 2024. The primary outcome was short-term mortality. Secondary outcomes included bowel resection, second-look laparotomy, and short bowel syndrome. The counterenhanced funnel plot and the Peters' test were used to assess bias. Outcomes were reported as odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) using the Mantel-Haenszel method. The GRADE classification was used to estimate the certainty of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 studies (1141 patients) comparing EVR vs OSR for arterial AMI were identified and analyzed. The mean patient age was 61.9 to 73.6 years and 45.1% of the patients were male. Compared with OSR, EVR as the first treatment may not decrease short-term mortality (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.50-1.25; P = .31; very low certainty) and second-look laparotomy (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.30-3.36; P = .99; very low certainty). However, EVR may be associated with decreased bowel resection (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.20-0.88; P = .022; very low certainty) and short bowel syndrome (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.21-0.75; P = .005; very low certainty). The metaregression revealed that the mortality regarding EVR vs OSR was not impacted significantly by thrombotic etiology (-0.002; 95% CI, -0.027 to 0.022; P = .85), whereas it was impacted significantly by publication year (0.076; 95% CI, 0.069-0.145; P = .031).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with OSR, EVR as the first treatment for arterial AMI may not decrease short-term mortality or second-look laparotomy. Future multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed urgently to confirm these results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1883-1893.e2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.07.084\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.07.084","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的这项配对荟萃分析旨在比较动脉急性肠系膜缺血(AMI)首选血管内再通术(EVR)和开放手术血管内再通术(OSR)的死亡率和发病率:本系统综述和荟萃分析是根据系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明进行的。为了确定符合条件的研究,我们使用以下数据库执行了系统性检索策略:PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 数据库,检索时间从开始到 2023 年 12 月 31 日,仅限英语,检索结束日期为 2024 年 1 月 2 日。主要结果为短期死亡率。次要结局包括肠切除术、二次开腹手术和短肠综合征(SBS)。反增强漏斗图和彼得斯检验用于评估偏倚。采用曼特尔-汉斯泽尔(Mantel-Haenszel)法,以几率比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)的形式报告结果。采用 GRADE 分级法估算证据的确定性:结果:共确定并分析了11项研究(1141例患者),对动脉型AMI的EVR与OSR进行了比较。平均年龄为 61.9 - 73.6 岁,45.1% 的患者为男性。与 OSR 相比,EVR 作为首次治疗可能不会降低短期死亡率(OR 0.79;95% CI,0.50-1.25;P = 0.31;非常低的确定性)和二次开腹手术(OR 1.00;95% CI,0.30-3.36;P = 0.99;非常低的确定性)。然而,EVR 可能与肠切除术减少(OR 0.42;95% CI,0.20-0.88;p = 0.022;确定性很低)和 SBS(OR 0.39;95% CI,0.21-0.75;p = 0.005;确定性很低)有关。元回归显示,EVR与OSR相比,死亡率受血栓病因学影响不大(-0.002;95% CI,-0.027~0.022,p = 0.85),但受发表年份影响较大(0.076;95% CI,0.069~0.145,p = 0.031):结论:与OSR相比,EVR作为动脉型AMI的首次治疗可能不会降低短期死亡率和二次开腹手术。未来迫切需要多中心随机对照试验来证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endovascular revascularization vs open surgical revascularization as the first strategy for arterial acute mesenteric ischemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: This paired meta-analysis aimed to compare the mortality and morbidity of endovascular revascularization (EVR) and open surgical revascularization (OSR) as the first strategy for arterial acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI).

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. A systematic search strategy was performed to identify eligible studies using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library database from inception to December 31, 2023, with restriction to the English language. The end search date was January 2, 2024. The primary outcome was short-term mortality. Secondary outcomes included bowel resection, second-look laparotomy, and short bowel syndrome. The counterenhanced funnel plot and the Peters' test were used to assess bias. Outcomes were reported as odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) using the Mantel-Haenszel method. The GRADE classification was used to estimate the certainty of evidence.

Results: A total of 11 studies (1141 patients) comparing EVR vs OSR for arterial AMI were identified and analyzed. The mean patient age was 61.9 to 73.6 years and 45.1% of the patients were male. Compared with OSR, EVR as the first treatment may not decrease short-term mortality (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.50-1.25; P = .31; very low certainty) and second-look laparotomy (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.30-3.36; P = .99; very low certainty). However, EVR may be associated with decreased bowel resection (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.20-0.88; P = .022; very low certainty) and short bowel syndrome (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.21-0.75; P = .005; very low certainty). The metaregression revealed that the mortality regarding EVR vs OSR was not impacted significantly by thrombotic etiology (-0.002; 95% CI, -0.027 to 0.022; P = .85), whereas it was impacted significantly by publication year (0.076; 95% CI, 0.069-0.145; P = .031).

Conclusions: Compared with OSR, EVR as the first treatment for arterial AMI may not decrease short-term mortality or second-look laparotomy. Future multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed urgently to confirm these results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
期刊最新文献
Detangling sex-based disparities in acute limb ischemia outcomes-Progress is being made, but we are behind the curve. Just because we can technically do something does not mean that we should. Off-the-shelf Gore thoracoabdominal multibranch endoprosthesis: How will it impact physician-modified endografts? Race and income do not affect ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment modality. Radiation-induced bilateral common carotid artery occlusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1