Qian Zheng , Xue Lin , Wenli Qi , Jun Yin , Juan Li , Ye Wang , Weiya Wang , Weimin Li , Zongan Liang
{"title":"NGS 和 FISH 检测 EGFR TKI 耐药非小细胞肺癌 (NSCLC) 患者的 MET 扩增:中国一项前瞻性多中心研究。","authors":"Qian Zheng , Xue Lin , Wenli Qi , Jun Yin , Juan Li , Ye Wang , Weiya Wang , Weimin Li , Zongan Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Comprehensive data using Next-Generation Sequence (NGS) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for detecting <em>MET</em> amplification is limited in Chinese patients, we evaluating NGS performance both in tissue and plasma samples using FISH as reference. We also sought to find optimal thresholds value for NGS in detecting <em>MET</em> amplification via bioinformatics methods.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Patients progressed after 1st-, 2nd-, or 3rd-generation (G) EGFR-TKIs were enrolled. Tissue biopsy samples were performed for <em>MET</em> amplification detection via both NGS and FISH. Paired plasma samples were collected for <em>MET</em> amplification detection by NGS. The sensitivity, specificity and agreement were analyzed between NGS and FISH.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>116 eligible patients were analyzed. 44 patients were male. 82 patients were after 3rd generation EGFR-TKI. <em>MET</em> amplification was detected in 43 (37.1 %) patients by FISH, including 19 (16.4 %) polysomy and 24 (20.7 %) focal amplification. The positive rate of <em>MET</em> amplification in post 3rd generation EGFR-TKI and post 1st/2ndgeneration EGFR-TKI resistant patients was 42.7 % (35/82), and 23.5 % (8/34).</p><p>The sensitivity, specificity and agreement of detecting <em>MET</em> amplification by NGS in tissue were 39.5 % (17/43), 98.6 % (72/73) and 76.7 % (89/116), respectively, 66.7 % (16/24), 98.6 % (72/73) and 90.7 % (88/97) for focal <em>MET</em> amplification in tissue and 29.2 % (7/24), 94.5 % (69/73), 78.4 % (76/97) for focal amplification in plasma. Results were shown in the table below.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>NGS is an alternative method for <em>MET</em> focal amplification detection in tissue. While the sensitivity of NGS testing in plasma needs further improvement to maximize identification of patients with potential benefit from dual-targeted therapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 107897"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NGS and FISH for MET amplification detection in EGFR TKI resistant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients: A prospective, multicenter study in China\",\"authors\":\"Qian Zheng , Xue Lin , Wenli Qi , Jun Yin , Juan Li , Ye Wang , Weiya Wang , Weimin Li , Zongan Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107897\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Comprehensive data using Next-Generation Sequence (NGS) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for detecting <em>MET</em> amplification is limited in Chinese patients, we evaluating NGS performance both in tissue and plasma samples using FISH as reference. We also sought to find optimal thresholds value for NGS in detecting <em>MET</em> amplification via bioinformatics methods.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Patients progressed after 1st-, 2nd-, or 3rd-generation (G) EGFR-TKIs were enrolled. Tissue biopsy samples were performed for <em>MET</em> amplification detection via both NGS and FISH. Paired plasma samples were collected for <em>MET</em> amplification detection by NGS. The sensitivity, specificity and agreement were analyzed between NGS and FISH.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>116 eligible patients were analyzed. 44 patients were male. 82 patients were after 3rd generation EGFR-TKI. <em>MET</em> amplification was detected in 43 (37.1 %) patients by FISH, including 19 (16.4 %) polysomy and 24 (20.7 %) focal amplification. The positive rate of <em>MET</em> amplification in post 3rd generation EGFR-TKI and post 1st/2ndgeneration EGFR-TKI resistant patients was 42.7 % (35/82), and 23.5 % (8/34).</p><p>The sensitivity, specificity and agreement of detecting <em>MET</em> amplification by NGS in tissue were 39.5 % (17/43), 98.6 % (72/73) and 76.7 % (89/116), respectively, 66.7 % (16/24), 98.6 % (72/73) and 90.7 % (88/97) for focal <em>MET</em> amplification in tissue and 29.2 % (7/24), 94.5 % (69/73), 78.4 % (76/97) for focal amplification in plasma. Results were shown in the table below.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>NGS is an alternative method for <em>MET</em> focal amplification detection in tissue. While the sensitivity of NGS testing in plasma needs further improvement to maximize identification of patients with potential benefit from dual-targeted therapy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lung Cancer\",\"volume\":\"194 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107897\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lung Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169500224004318\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169500224004318","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:在中国患者中,使用下一代序列(NGS)和荧光原位杂交(FISH)检测 MET 扩增的综合数据有限,因此我们以 FISH 为参考,评估 NGS 在组织和血浆样本中的性能。我们还试图通过生物信息学方法找到 NGS 检测 MET 扩增的最佳阈值:方法:招募使用第一代、第二代或第三代(G)表皮生长因子受体抑制剂(EGFR-TKIs)后病情进展的患者。组织活检样本通过 NGS 和 FISH 检测 MET 扩增。收集配对血浆样本,通过 NGS 检测 MET 扩增。分析了 NGS 和 FISH 的灵敏度、特异性和一致性:对 116 名符合条件的患者进行了分析。44 名患者为男性。82名患者接受了第三代表皮生长因子受体-TKI治疗。FISH 检测到 43 例(37.1%)患者存在 MET 扩增,包括 19 例(16.4%)多体和 24 例(20.7%)局灶性扩增。第三代表皮生长因子受体-TKI治疗后和第一/二代表皮生长因子受体-TKI治疗后耐药患者的MET扩增阳性率分别为42.7%(35/82)和23.5%(8/34)。通过 NGS 检测组织中 MET 扩增的灵敏度、特异性和一致性分别为 39.5 %(17/43)、98.6 %(72/73)和 76.7 %(89/116);检测组织中局灶性 MET 扩增的灵敏度、特异性和一致性分别为 66.7 %(16/24)、98.6 %(72/73)和 90.7 %(88/97);检测血浆中局灶性 MET 扩增的灵敏度、特异性和一致性分别为 29.2 %(7/24)、94.5 %(69/73)和 78.4 %(76/97)。结果如下表所示:NGS 是组织中 MET 局灶扩增检测的一种替代方法。结论:NGS 是组织中 MET 局灶扩增检测的替代方法,但需要进一步提高血浆中 NGS 检测的灵敏度,以最大限度地识别可能从双靶向治疗中获益的患者。
NGS and FISH for MET amplification detection in EGFR TKI resistant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients: A prospective, multicenter study in China
Objectives
Comprehensive data using Next-Generation Sequence (NGS) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for detecting MET amplification is limited in Chinese patients, we evaluating NGS performance both in tissue and plasma samples using FISH as reference. We also sought to find optimal thresholds value for NGS in detecting MET amplification via bioinformatics methods.
Method
Patients progressed after 1st-, 2nd-, or 3rd-generation (G) EGFR-TKIs were enrolled. Tissue biopsy samples were performed for MET amplification detection via both NGS and FISH. Paired plasma samples were collected for MET amplification detection by NGS. The sensitivity, specificity and agreement were analyzed between NGS and FISH.
Results
116 eligible patients were analyzed. 44 patients were male. 82 patients were after 3rd generation EGFR-TKI. MET amplification was detected in 43 (37.1 %) patients by FISH, including 19 (16.4 %) polysomy and 24 (20.7 %) focal amplification. The positive rate of MET amplification in post 3rd generation EGFR-TKI and post 1st/2ndgeneration EGFR-TKI resistant patients was 42.7 % (35/82), and 23.5 % (8/34).
The sensitivity, specificity and agreement of detecting MET amplification by NGS in tissue were 39.5 % (17/43), 98.6 % (72/73) and 76.7 % (89/116), respectively, 66.7 % (16/24), 98.6 % (72/73) and 90.7 % (88/97) for focal MET amplification in tissue and 29.2 % (7/24), 94.5 % (69/73), 78.4 % (76/97) for focal amplification in plasma. Results were shown in the table below.
Conclusion
NGS is an alternative method for MET focal amplification detection in tissue. While the sensitivity of NGS testing in plasma needs further improvement to maximize identification of patients with potential benefit from dual-targeted therapy.
期刊介绍:
Lung Cancer is an international publication covering the clinical, translational and basic science of malignancies of the lung and chest region.Original research articles, early reports, review articles, editorials and correspondence covering the prevention, epidemiology and etiology, basic biology, pathology, clinical assessment, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, combined treatment modalities, other treatment modalities and outcomes of lung cancer are welcome.