针对双相情感障碍患者的集体心理教育:关于延迟复发和复发强度有效性的回顾性研究。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Rivista di psichiatria Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1708/4320.43059
Morena Melli, Giuseppe Lucchini, Silvia Pacchioni, Carlo Soragna, Cristina Venco, Debora Bussolotti
{"title":"针对双相情感障碍患者的集体心理教育:关于延迟复发和复发强度有效性的回顾性研究。","authors":"Morena Melli, Giuseppe Lucchini, Silvia Pacchioni, Carlo Soragna, Cristina Venco, Debora Bussolotti","doi":"10.1708/4320.43059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Group psychoeducation is effective in preventing relapse in bipolar disorder. It's indicated as an adjunctive intervention to pharmacotherapy for all outpatients. This retrospective, single center experience of group psychoeducation for bipolar disorder over a 6 years period, aims to assess severity of symptoms and comparative relapse episodes and intensity prior to and following psychoeducation as well as evaluating the decrease in hospitalizations and days of hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2014 and 2019 patients with a bipolar disorder were invited to attend a Colom model group psychoeducation (weekly 90 minutes sessions for 22 weeks). Depression and mania were assessed at baseline, following psychoeducation, 6 months and 12 months with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). Patient specific hospitalization admissions data for 3 years prior to and 3 years following psychoeducation course were accessed. Subgroup analyses were performed according to patient sex and age with ANOVA methodology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 95 eligible patients, 77 completed psychoeducation: 18 (19%) patients dropped out. Mean patient age was 45 years and 33 (43%) were male. Overall and subgroup specific YMRS and HDRS improved significantly throughout follow-up (p<0.01). Hospitalization analyses (45 patients; 58.4%) revealed a significant decrease in relapse and hospital stay days after psychoeducation, p<0.01.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We provide evidence of applicability and efficacy of adjunctive psychoeducation in a real-world setting. Advantages observed were independent of patient sex and age. Analysis of the optimal number of sessions provided to patients according to efficacy and retention rates is required.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite inherent study design limitations, retrospective evaluation of a single-center psychoeducation program supports evidence of psychoeducation effectiveness in significantly reducing the severity of bipolar disorder and hospitalizations, despite a drop-out rate of 1 in 5.</p>","PeriodicalId":21506,"journal":{"name":"Rivista di psichiatria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Group psychoeducation for patients with bipolar disorder: a retrospective study on effectiveness in delaying relapse episodes and intensity.\",\"authors\":\"Morena Melli, Giuseppe Lucchini, Silvia Pacchioni, Carlo Soragna, Cristina Venco, Debora Bussolotti\",\"doi\":\"10.1708/4320.43059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Group psychoeducation is effective in preventing relapse in bipolar disorder. It's indicated as an adjunctive intervention to pharmacotherapy for all outpatients. This retrospective, single center experience of group psychoeducation for bipolar disorder over a 6 years period, aims to assess severity of symptoms and comparative relapse episodes and intensity prior to and following psychoeducation as well as evaluating the decrease in hospitalizations and days of hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2014 and 2019 patients with a bipolar disorder were invited to attend a Colom model group psychoeducation (weekly 90 minutes sessions for 22 weeks). Depression and mania were assessed at baseline, following psychoeducation, 6 months and 12 months with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). Patient specific hospitalization admissions data for 3 years prior to and 3 years following psychoeducation course were accessed. Subgroup analyses were performed according to patient sex and age with ANOVA methodology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 95 eligible patients, 77 completed psychoeducation: 18 (19%) patients dropped out. Mean patient age was 45 years and 33 (43%) were male. Overall and subgroup specific YMRS and HDRS improved significantly throughout follow-up (p<0.01). Hospitalization analyses (45 patients; 58.4%) revealed a significant decrease in relapse and hospital stay days after psychoeducation, p<0.01.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We provide evidence of applicability and efficacy of adjunctive psychoeducation in a real-world setting. Advantages observed were independent of patient sex and age. Analysis of the optimal number of sessions provided to patients according to efficacy and retention rates is required.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite inherent study design limitations, retrospective evaluation of a single-center psychoeducation program supports evidence of psychoeducation effectiveness in significantly reducing the severity of bipolar disorder and hospitalizations, despite a drop-out rate of 1 in 5.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rivista di psichiatria\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rivista di psichiatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1708/4320.43059\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rivista di psichiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1708/4320.43059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介集体心理教育能有效预防躁郁症复发。它适用于所有门诊患者,是药物治疗的辅助干预措施。本研究是一项回顾性的单中心研究,旨在评估双相情感障碍患者在接受心理教育前后的症状严重程度、复发次数和复发强度,以及住院次数和住院天数的减少情况:2014年至2019年期间,双相情感障碍患者受邀参加了科洛姆模式的小组心理教育(每周90分钟,共22周)。在基线、心理教育结束后、6个月和12个月时,使用汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HDRS)和青年躁狂评定量表(YMRS)对抑郁和躁狂进行评估。此外,还获取了心理教育课程之前 3 年和之后 3 年的患者住院数据。根据患者的性别和年龄,采用方差分析法进行分组分析:在 95 名符合条件的患者中,77 人完成了心理教育:结果:在 95 名符合条件的患者中,77 人完成了心理教育:18 人(19%)退出。患者平均年龄为 45 岁,男性 33 人(占 43%)。在整个随访过程中,总体和亚组的 YMRS 和 HDRS 均有显著改善(p 讨论:我们提供了在真实世界环境中辅助心理教育的适用性和有效性的证据。观察到的优势与患者的性别和年龄无关。需要根据疗效和保留率分析为患者提供的最佳疗程次数:尽管研究设计存在固有的局限性,但对单中心心理教育项目的回顾性评估证明,心理教育在显著降低双相情感障碍的严重程度和住院率方面是有效的,尽管辍学率高达五分之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Group psychoeducation for patients with bipolar disorder: a retrospective study on effectiveness in delaying relapse episodes and intensity.

Introduction: Group psychoeducation is effective in preventing relapse in bipolar disorder. It's indicated as an adjunctive intervention to pharmacotherapy for all outpatients. This retrospective, single center experience of group psychoeducation for bipolar disorder over a 6 years period, aims to assess severity of symptoms and comparative relapse episodes and intensity prior to and following psychoeducation as well as evaluating the decrease in hospitalizations and days of hospitalization.

Methods: Between 2014 and 2019 patients with a bipolar disorder were invited to attend a Colom model group psychoeducation (weekly 90 minutes sessions for 22 weeks). Depression and mania were assessed at baseline, following psychoeducation, 6 months and 12 months with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). Patient specific hospitalization admissions data for 3 years prior to and 3 years following psychoeducation course were accessed. Subgroup analyses were performed according to patient sex and age with ANOVA methodology.

Results: Of the 95 eligible patients, 77 completed psychoeducation: 18 (19%) patients dropped out. Mean patient age was 45 years and 33 (43%) were male. Overall and subgroup specific YMRS and HDRS improved significantly throughout follow-up (p<0.01). Hospitalization analyses (45 patients; 58.4%) revealed a significant decrease in relapse and hospital stay days after psychoeducation, p<0.01.

Discussion: We provide evidence of applicability and efficacy of adjunctive psychoeducation in a real-world setting. Advantages observed were independent of patient sex and age. Analysis of the optimal number of sessions provided to patients according to efficacy and retention rates is required.

Conclusions: Despite inherent study design limitations, retrospective evaluation of a single-center psychoeducation program supports evidence of psychoeducation effectiveness in significantly reducing the severity of bipolar disorder and hospitalizations, despite a drop-out rate of 1 in 5.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rivista di psichiatria
Rivista di psichiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.70%
发文量
31
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gli interessi della rivista riguardano l’approfondimento delle interazioni tra mente e malattia, la validazione e la discussione dei nuovi strumenti e parametri di classificazione diagnostica, la verifica delle prospettive terapeutiche farmacologiche e non.
期刊最新文献
[Taking care of minor offenders: between methodological practices and experience.] Group psychoeducation for patients with bipolar disorder: a retrospective study on effectiveness in delaying relapse episodes and intensity. 'I Can't Get No Satisfaction'… Experience in the treatment, satisfaction, and professional support of young depressed people using SPARX. Problematic use of Internet in a sample of psychiatric outpatients: preliminary observations from the "real world". Suicide-risk-related factors in a psychiatric patient cohort: a cross sectional study on outpatients, inpatients, and therapeutic community patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1