Nuria Blasco-Lavilla, Alejandro López-López, Pilar De la Rúa, Seth Michael Barribeau
{"title":"炸弹 Crithidia 的感染增加了陆生小蜂肠道中乳酸杆菌的相对丰度。","authors":"Nuria Blasco-Lavilla, Alejandro López-López, Pilar De la Rúa, Seth Michael Barribeau","doi":"10.1111/mec.17478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gut microbial communities confer protection against natural pathogens in important pollinators from the genera <i>Bombus</i> and <i>Apis</i>. In commercial species <i>B. terrestris</i> and <i>B. impatiens</i>, the microbiota increases their resistance to the common and virulent trypanosomatid parasite <i>Crithidia bombi</i>. However, the mechanisms by which gut microorganisms protect the host are still unknown. Here, we test two hypotheses: microbiota protect the host (1) through stimulation of its immune response or protection of the gut epithelium and (2) by competing for resources with the parasite inside the gut. To test them, we reduced the microbiota of workers and then rescued the microbial community by feeding them with microbiota supplements. We then exposed them to an infectious dose of <i>C. bombi</i> and characterised gene expression and gut microbiota composition. We examined the expression of three antimicrobial peptide genes and <i>Mucin-5AC</i>, a gene with a putative role in gut epithelium protection, using qPCR. Although a protective effect against <i>C. bombi</i> was observed in bumblebees with supplemented microbiota, we did not observe an effect of the microbiota on gene expression that could explain alone the protective effect observed. On the other hand, we found an increased relative abundance of <i>Lactobacillus</i> bacteria within the gut of infected workers and a negative correlation of this genus with <i>Gilliamella</i> and <i>Snodgrassella</i> genera. Therefore, our results point to a displacement of bumblebee endosymbionts by <i>C. bombi</i> that might be caused by competition for space and nutrients between the parasite and the microbiota within the gut.</p>","PeriodicalId":210,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infection by Crithidia bombi increases relative abundance of Lactobacillus spp. in the gut of Bombus terrestris\",\"authors\":\"Nuria Blasco-Lavilla, Alejandro López-López, Pilar De la Rúa, Seth Michael Barribeau\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/mec.17478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Gut microbial communities confer protection against natural pathogens in important pollinators from the genera <i>Bombus</i> and <i>Apis</i>. In commercial species <i>B. terrestris</i> and <i>B. impatiens</i>, the microbiota increases their resistance to the common and virulent trypanosomatid parasite <i>Crithidia bombi</i>. However, the mechanisms by which gut microorganisms protect the host are still unknown. Here, we test two hypotheses: microbiota protect the host (1) through stimulation of its immune response or protection of the gut epithelium and (2) by competing for resources with the parasite inside the gut. To test them, we reduced the microbiota of workers and then rescued the microbial community by feeding them with microbiota supplements. We then exposed them to an infectious dose of <i>C. bombi</i> and characterised gene expression and gut microbiota composition. We examined the expression of three antimicrobial peptide genes and <i>Mucin-5AC</i>, a gene with a putative role in gut epithelium protection, using qPCR. Although a protective effect against <i>C. bombi</i> was observed in bumblebees with supplemented microbiota, we did not observe an effect of the microbiota on gene expression that could explain alone the protective effect observed. On the other hand, we found an increased relative abundance of <i>Lactobacillus</i> bacteria within the gut of infected workers and a negative correlation of this genus with <i>Gilliamella</i> and <i>Snodgrassella</i> genera. Therefore, our results point to a displacement of bumblebee endosymbionts by <i>C. bombi</i> that might be caused by competition for space and nutrients between the parasite and the microbiota within the gut.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Ecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mec.17478\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mec.17478","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
肠道微生物群落能保护重要的传粉昆虫--蚕属(Bombus)和蜂属(Apis)--免受自然病原体的侵害。在商业物种 B. terrestris 和 B. impatiens 中,微生物群增加了它们对常见的毒性锥虫寄生虫 Crithidia bombi 的抵抗力。然而,肠道微生物保护宿主的机制仍然未知。在这里,我们验证了两个假设:微生物群保护宿主的方式(1)是通过刺激宿主的免疫反应或保护肠道上皮;(2)是通过在肠道内与寄生虫争夺资源。为了验证这些假设,我们减少了工人的微生物群,然后通过给他们喂食微生物群补充剂来拯救微生物群落。然后,我们将它们暴露于传染性剂量的炸弹虫,并对基因表达和肠道微生物群组成进行了表征。我们使用 qPCR 检测了三种抗菌肽基因和 Mucin-5AC 的表达,Mucin-5AC 是一种可能在肠道上皮保护中发挥作用的基因。虽然在补充了微生物群的大黄蜂体内观察到了对C. bombi的保护作用,但我们并没有观察到微生物群对基因表达的影响,这种影响无法单独解释所观察到的保护作用。另一方面,我们发现在受感染的工蜂肠道中,乳酸杆菌的相对丰度有所增加,而且乳酸杆菌属与吉利菌属和斯诺德格拉斯菌属呈负相关。因此,我们的研究结果表明,由于寄生虫与肠道内的微生物群争夺空间和养分,大黄蜂内共生菌可能被炸弹虫取代。
Infection by Crithidia bombi increases relative abundance of Lactobacillus spp. in the gut of Bombus terrestris
Gut microbial communities confer protection against natural pathogens in important pollinators from the genera Bombus and Apis. In commercial species B. terrestris and B. impatiens, the microbiota increases their resistance to the common and virulent trypanosomatid parasite Crithidia bombi. However, the mechanisms by which gut microorganisms protect the host are still unknown. Here, we test two hypotheses: microbiota protect the host (1) through stimulation of its immune response or protection of the gut epithelium and (2) by competing for resources with the parasite inside the gut. To test them, we reduced the microbiota of workers and then rescued the microbial community by feeding them with microbiota supplements. We then exposed them to an infectious dose of C. bombi and characterised gene expression and gut microbiota composition. We examined the expression of three antimicrobial peptide genes and Mucin-5AC, a gene with a putative role in gut epithelium protection, using qPCR. Although a protective effect against C. bombi was observed in bumblebees with supplemented microbiota, we did not observe an effect of the microbiota on gene expression that could explain alone the protective effect observed. On the other hand, we found an increased relative abundance of Lactobacillus bacteria within the gut of infected workers and a negative correlation of this genus with Gilliamella and Snodgrassella genera. Therefore, our results point to a displacement of bumblebee endosymbionts by C. bombi that might be caused by competition for space and nutrients between the parasite and the microbiota within the gut.
期刊介绍:
Molecular Ecology publishes papers that utilize molecular genetic techniques to address consequential questions in ecology, evolution, behaviour and conservation. Studies may employ neutral markers for inference about ecological and evolutionary processes or examine ecologically important genes and their products directly. We discourage papers that are primarily descriptive and are relevant only to the taxon being studied. Papers reporting on molecular marker development, molecular diagnostics, barcoding, or DNA taxonomy, or technical methods should be re-directed to our sister journal, Molecular Ecology Resources. Likewise, papers with a strongly applied focus should be submitted to Evolutionary Applications. Research areas of interest to Molecular Ecology include:
* population structure and phylogeography
* reproductive strategies
* relatedness and kin selection
* sex allocation
* population genetic theory
* analytical methods development
* conservation genetics
* speciation genetics
* microbial biodiversity
* evolutionary dynamics of QTLs
* ecological interactions
* molecular adaptation and environmental genomics
* impact of genetically modified organisms