对以规则为基础的临床决策支持失灵的范围审查。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocae187
Jeritt G Thayer, Amy Franklin, Jeffrey M Miller, Robert W Grundmeier, Deevakar Rogith, Adam Wright
{"title":"对以规则为基础的临床决策支持失灵的范围审查。","authors":"Jeritt G Thayer, Amy Franklin, Jeffrey M Miller, Robert W Grundmeier, Deevakar Rogith, Adam Wright","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocae187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Conduct a scoping review of research studies that describe rule-based clinical decision support (CDS) malfunctions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In April 2022, we searched three bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase) for literature referencing CDS malfunctions. We coded the identified malfunctions according to an existing CDS malfunction taxonomy and added new categories for factors not already captured. We also extracted and summarized information related to the CDS system, such as architecture, data source, and data format.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight articles met inclusion criteria, capturing 130 malfunctions. Architectures used included stand-alone systems (eg, web-based calculator), integrated systems (eg, best practices alerts), and service-oriented architectures (eg, distributed systems like SMART or CDS Hooks). No standards-based CDS malfunctions were identified. The \"Cause\" category of the original taxonomy includes three new types (organizational policy, hardware error, and data source) and two existing causes were expanded to include additional layers. Only 29 malfunctions (22%) described the potential impact of the malfunction on patient care.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While a substantial amount of research on CDS exists, our review indicates there is a limited focus on CDS malfunctions, with even less attention on malfunctions associated with modern delivery architectures such as SMART and CDS Hooks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CDS malfunctions can and do occur across several different care delivery architectures. To account for advances in health information technology, existing taxonomies of CDS malfunctions must be continually updated. This will be especially important for service-oriented architectures, which connect several disparate systems, and are increasing in use.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A scoping review of rule-based clinical decision support malfunctions.\",\"authors\":\"Jeritt G Thayer, Amy Franklin, Jeffrey M Miller, Robert W Grundmeier, Deevakar Rogith, Adam Wright\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamia/ocae187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Conduct a scoping review of research studies that describe rule-based clinical decision support (CDS) malfunctions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In April 2022, we searched three bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase) for literature referencing CDS malfunctions. We coded the identified malfunctions according to an existing CDS malfunction taxonomy and added new categories for factors not already captured. We also extracted and summarized information related to the CDS system, such as architecture, data source, and data format.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight articles met inclusion criteria, capturing 130 malfunctions. Architectures used included stand-alone systems (eg, web-based calculator), integrated systems (eg, best practices alerts), and service-oriented architectures (eg, distributed systems like SMART or CDS Hooks). No standards-based CDS malfunctions were identified. The \\\"Cause\\\" category of the original taxonomy includes three new types (organizational policy, hardware error, and data source) and two existing causes were expanded to include additional layers. Only 29 malfunctions (22%) described the potential impact of the malfunction on patient care.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While a substantial amount of research on CDS exists, our review indicates there is a limited focus on CDS malfunctions, with even less attention on malfunctions associated with modern delivery architectures such as SMART and CDS Hooks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CDS malfunctions can and do occur across several different care delivery architectures. To account for advances in health information technology, existing taxonomies of CDS malfunctions must be continually updated. This will be especially important for service-oriented architectures, which connect several disparate systems, and are increasing in use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocae187\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocae187","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要对描述基于规则的临床决策支持(CDS)故障的研究进行范围界定:2022 年 4 月,我们检索了三个文献数据库(MEDLINE、CINAHL 和 Embase)中引用 CDS 故障的文献。我们根据现有的 CDS 故障分类标准对已确定的故障进行了编码,并对尚未包含的因素添加了新的类别。我们还提取并总结了 CDS 系统的相关信息,如架构、数据源和数据格式等:结果:28 篇文章符合纳入标准,共记录了 130 个故障。使用的架构包括独立系统(如基于网络的计算器)、集成系统(如最佳实践警报)和面向服务的架构(如 SMART 或 CDS Hooks 等分布式系统)。没有发现基于标准的 CDS 故障。原始分类法中的 "原因 "类别包括三种新类型(组织政策、硬件错误和数据源),现有的两种原因被扩展到更多层次。只有 29 个故障(22%)描述了故障对患者护理的潜在影响:讨论:虽然存在大量关于 CDS 的研究,但我们的审查表明,对 CDS 故障的关注有限,而对与 SMART 和 CDS Hooks 等现代交付架构相关的故障的关注则更少:结论:在几种不同的医疗服务架构中都可能发生 CDS 故障。为了适应医疗信息技术的发展,现有的 CDS 故障分类标准必须不断更新。这对于面向服务的架构尤为重要,因为这种架构连接了多个不同的系统,而且使用率越来越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A scoping review of rule-based clinical decision support malfunctions.

Objective: Conduct a scoping review of research studies that describe rule-based clinical decision support (CDS) malfunctions.

Materials and methods: In April 2022, we searched three bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase) for literature referencing CDS malfunctions. We coded the identified malfunctions according to an existing CDS malfunction taxonomy and added new categories for factors not already captured. We also extracted and summarized information related to the CDS system, such as architecture, data source, and data format.

Results: Twenty-eight articles met inclusion criteria, capturing 130 malfunctions. Architectures used included stand-alone systems (eg, web-based calculator), integrated systems (eg, best practices alerts), and service-oriented architectures (eg, distributed systems like SMART or CDS Hooks). No standards-based CDS malfunctions were identified. The "Cause" category of the original taxonomy includes three new types (organizational policy, hardware error, and data source) and two existing causes were expanded to include additional layers. Only 29 malfunctions (22%) described the potential impact of the malfunction on patient care.

Discussion: While a substantial amount of research on CDS exists, our review indicates there is a limited focus on CDS malfunctions, with even less attention on malfunctions associated with modern delivery architectures such as SMART and CDS Hooks.

Conclusion: CDS malfunctions can and do occur across several different care delivery architectures. To account for advances in health information technology, existing taxonomies of CDS malfunctions must be continually updated. This will be especially important for service-oriented architectures, which connect several disparate systems, and are increasing in use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
7.80%
发文量
230
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.
期刊最新文献
A machine-learning prediction model to identify risk of firearm injury using electronic health records data. Cigarette smoking, e-cigarette use, and sociodemographic correlates of mental health and tobacco-related disease risk in the All of Us research program. CACER: Clinical concept Annotations for Cancer Events and Relations. Foundation model-driven distributed learning for enhanced retinal age prediction. Implementation and delivery of electronic health records training programs for nurses working in inpatient settings: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1