中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值作为钝性创伤猫预后标志物的回顾性评估(2018-2021 年):177例。

IF 1.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1111/vec.13414
Pavlos G. Doulidis DVM, Yasamin Vali DVM, Caroline Frizzo Ramos DVM, Abigail Guija-de-Arespacochaga DVM, DECVCP
{"title":"中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值作为钝性创伤猫预后标志物的回顾性评估(2018-2021 年):177例。","authors":"Pavlos G. Doulidis DVM,&nbsp;Yasamin Vali DVM,&nbsp;Caroline Frizzo Ramos DVM,&nbsp;Abigail Guija-de-Arespacochaga DVM, DECVCP","doi":"10.1111/vec.13414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the utility of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a prognostic marker in cats with blunt trauma.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective study from January 2018 to December 2021.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>University teaching hospital.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Animals</h3>\n \n <p>Medical records of 177 cats admitted with blunt trauma were evaluated. History, clinical findings, blood cell count-based ratios, thoracic radiographs on presentation, and outcome were reviewed. The Animal Trauma Triage (ATT) score was assessed in each cat and classified as mild (1–3), moderate (4–7), and severe trauma (≥8). Forty-eight healthy blood donor cats served as the control population. NLR, neutrophil counts, and lymphocyte counts were compared between cats with blunt trauma and controls, and among trauma patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interventions</h3>\n \n <p>None</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Measurements and Main Results</h3>\n \n <p>NLR, neutrophil counts, and lymphocyte counts significantly differ in cats with blunt trauma compared to controls (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and NLR was higher in patients with thoracic trauma (<i>p</i> = 0.044). Nonsurvivors had lower lymphocyte counts (<i>p</i> = 0.041), although those values do not appear to be clinically relevant. A significant increase in NLR was observed with increasing severity of trauma (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The NLR was not associated with the length of hospitalization, intensive care assistance, or mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>NLR is a widely available diagnostic tool, which can be used in addition to ATT to assess trauma severity, although in our study it was not predictive of the outcome.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","volume":"34 5","pages":"478-486"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/vec.13414","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective evaluation of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic marker in cats with blunt trauma (2018–2021): 177 cases\",\"authors\":\"Pavlos G. Doulidis DVM,&nbsp;Yasamin Vali DVM,&nbsp;Caroline Frizzo Ramos DVM,&nbsp;Abigail Guija-de-Arespacochaga DVM, DECVCP\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vec.13414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To investigate the utility of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a prognostic marker in cats with blunt trauma.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Retrospective study from January 2018 to December 2021.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting</h3>\\n \\n <p>University teaching hospital.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Animals</h3>\\n \\n <p>Medical records of 177 cats admitted with blunt trauma were evaluated. History, clinical findings, blood cell count-based ratios, thoracic radiographs on presentation, and outcome were reviewed. The Animal Trauma Triage (ATT) score was assessed in each cat and classified as mild (1–3), moderate (4–7), and severe trauma (≥8). Forty-eight healthy blood donor cats served as the control population. NLR, neutrophil counts, and lymphocyte counts were compared between cats with blunt trauma and controls, and among trauma patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Interventions</h3>\\n \\n <p>None</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Measurements and Main Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>NLR, neutrophil counts, and lymphocyte counts significantly differ in cats with blunt trauma compared to controls (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and NLR was higher in patients with thoracic trauma (<i>p</i> = 0.044). Nonsurvivors had lower lymphocyte counts (<i>p</i> = 0.041), although those values do not appear to be clinically relevant. A significant increase in NLR was observed with increasing severity of trauma (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The NLR was not associated with the length of hospitalization, intensive care assistance, or mortality.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>NLR is a widely available diagnostic tool, which can be used in addition to ATT to assess trauma severity, although in our study it was not predictive of the outcome.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care\",\"volume\":\"34 5\",\"pages\":\"478-486\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/vec.13414\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/vec.13414\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/vec.13414","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)作为钝性创伤猫预后标志物的实用性:2018年1月至2021年12月的回顾性研究:大学教学医院:评估了 177 只因钝性外伤入院的猫的病历。回顾了病史、临床发现、基于血细胞计数的比率、发病时的胸部X光片以及结果。评估了每只猫的动物创伤分诊(ATT)评分,并将其分为轻度(1-3)、中度(4-7)和重度创伤(≥8)。48 只健康献血猫作为对照组。比较钝性创伤猫与对照组以及创伤患者的 NLR、中性粒细胞计数和淋巴细胞计数:测量和主要结果:与对照组相比,钝挫伤猫的 NLR、中性粒细胞计数和淋巴细胞计数均有显著差异(P 结论:NLR 是一种广泛应用的诊断方法:NLR 是一种广泛使用的诊断工具,可与 ATT 一起用于评估创伤严重程度,但在我们的研究中,NLR 并不能预测结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Retrospective evaluation of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic marker in cats with blunt trauma (2018–2021): 177 cases

Objective

To investigate the utility of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a prognostic marker in cats with blunt trauma.

Design

Retrospective study from January 2018 to December 2021.

Setting

University teaching hospital.

Animals

Medical records of 177 cats admitted with blunt trauma were evaluated. History, clinical findings, blood cell count-based ratios, thoracic radiographs on presentation, and outcome were reviewed. The Animal Trauma Triage (ATT) score was assessed in each cat and classified as mild (1–3), moderate (4–7), and severe trauma (≥8). Forty-eight healthy blood donor cats served as the control population. NLR, neutrophil counts, and lymphocyte counts were compared between cats with blunt trauma and controls, and among trauma patients.

Interventions

None

Measurements and Main Results

NLR, neutrophil counts, and lymphocyte counts significantly differ in cats with blunt trauma compared to controls (p < 0.001), and NLR was higher in patients with thoracic trauma (p = 0.044). Nonsurvivors had lower lymphocyte counts (p = 0.041), although those values do not appear to be clinically relevant. A significant increase in NLR was observed with increasing severity of trauma (p < 0.001). The NLR was not associated with the length of hospitalization, intensive care assistance, or mortality.

Conclusion

NLR is a widely available diagnostic tool, which can be used in addition to ATT to assess trauma severity, although in our study it was not predictive of the outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
121
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care’s primary aim is to advance the international clinical standard of care for emergency/critical care patients of all species. The journal’s content is relevant to specialist and non-specialist veterinarians practicing emergency/critical care medicine. The journal achieves it aims by publishing descriptions of unique presentation or management; retrospective and prospective evaluations of prognosis, novel diagnosis, or therapy; translational basic science studies with clinical relevance; in depth reviews of pertinent topics; topical news and letters; and regular themed issues. The journal is the official publication of the Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, the American College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care, the European Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, and the European College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care. It is a bimonthly publication with international impact and adheres to currently accepted ethical standards.
期刊最新文献
Fabio Viganó Jennifer J. Devey Issue Information - Prelim AUTHOR INDEX Abstracts from the International Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Symposium and the European Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Annual Congress 2024
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1