评估YiDiXieâ¢-SS、YiDiXieâ¢-HS和YiDiXieâ¢-D对肾癌的诊断价值

Y. Wu, Y. Li, H. Zhou, C. Sun, X. Li, Z. Ge, W. Chen, S. Lin, P. Zhang, W. Wang, S. Chen, W. Li, L. Tao, X. Wu, L. Bi, Y. Lai
{"title":"评估YiDiXieâ¢-SS、YiDiXieâ¢-HS和YiDiXieâ¢-D对肾癌的诊断价值","authors":"Y. Wu, Y. Li, H. Zhou, C. Sun, X. Li, Z. Ge, W. Chen, S. Lin, P. Zhang, W. Wang, S. Chen, W. Li, L. Tao, X. Wu, L. Bi, Y. Lai","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.28.24310613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Renal cancer is a serious threat to human health and causes heavy economic burden. Ultrasound is widely used in screening or preliminary diagnosis of renal tumors, and enhanced CT is widely used in the diagnosis of renal tumors. However, false-positive results of ultrasound and enhanced CT will bring unnecessary mental pain, expensive examination costs, physical injuries, and even adverse consequences such as organ removal and loss of function; while false-negative results of enhanced CT bring delayed treatment, and patients will thus have to bear the adverse consequences of poor prognosis, high treatment costs, poor quality of life, and short survival period. There is an urgent need to find convenient, cost-effective and non-invasive diagnostic methods to reduce the false-positive rate of ultrasound and the false-negative and false-positive rates of enhanced CT in renal tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of YiDiXie-SS, YiDiXie-HS and YiDiXie-D in renal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 298 subjects (malignant group, n=233; benign group, n=65) were finally included in this study. Remaining serum samples from the subjects were collected and tested by applying the YiDiXie all-cancer detection kit to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of YiDiXie-SS, YiDiXie-HS and YiDiXie-D, respectively. RESULTS: The sensitivity of YiDiXie-SS in renal ultrasound-positive patients was 98.3% (95% CI: 95.7% - 99.3%; 229/233) with a specificity of 66.2% (95% CI: 54.0% - 76.5%; 43/65). Compared to the application of enhanced CT alone, sequential use of YiDiXie-SS and CT had comparable sensitivity, but the false positive rate decreased from 21.5% (95% CI: 13.3% - 33.0%; 14/65) to 6.2% (95% CI: 2.4% - 14.8%; 4/65). This means that the application of YiDiXie-SS reduced the false-positive rate of ultrasound by 66.2% (95% CI: 54.0% - 76.5%; 43/65) and the false-positive rate of enhanced CT by 71.4% with essentially no increase in malignancy leakage.The sensitivity of YiDiXie-HS in patients with a negative enhanced CT was 86.1% (95% CI. 71.3% - 93.9%; 31/36) and specificity was 84.3% (95% CI: 72.0% - 91.8%; 43/51). This means that YiDiXie-HS reduced the false-negative rate of enhanced CT by 86.1% (95% CI: 71.3% - 93.9%; 31/36).YiDiXie-D had a sensitivity of 29.4% (95% CI: 23.5% - 36.2%; 58/197) and a specificity of 92.9% (95% CI: 68.5% - 99.6%) in patients with positive enhanced CT. This means that YiDiXie-D reduces the false positive rate of enhanced CT by 92.9% (95% CI: 68.5% - 99.6%; 13/14). CONCLUSION: YiDiXie-SS dramatically reduces the false-positive rate of ultrasound and enhanced CT with essentially no increase in delayed treatment of malignant tumors. YiDiXie-HS dramatically reduces the false-negative rate of enhanced CT. YiDiXie-D dramatically reduces the false-positive rate of enhanced CT. The YiDiXie test has significant diagnostic value in renal tumors, and is expected to solve the 3 problems of \"high false-positive rate of ultrasound\", \"high false-negative rate of enhanced CT\" and \"high false-positive rate of enhanced CT\". Clinical Research Registration Number:ChiCTR2200066840. Keywords:Renal cancer, Ultrasound, Enhanced CT, False-positive, False-negative, YiDiXie-SS, YiDiXie-HS, YiDiXie-D","PeriodicalId":506788,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS and YiDiXie™-D in renal cancer\",\"authors\":\"Y. Wu, Y. Li, H. Zhou, C. Sun, X. Li, Z. Ge, W. Chen, S. Lin, P. Zhang, W. Wang, S. Chen, W. Li, L. Tao, X. Wu, L. Bi, Y. Lai\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.07.28.24310613\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Renal cancer is a serious threat to human health and causes heavy economic burden. Ultrasound is widely used in screening or preliminary diagnosis of renal tumors, and enhanced CT is widely used in the diagnosis of renal tumors. However, false-positive results of ultrasound and enhanced CT will bring unnecessary mental pain, expensive examination costs, physical injuries, and even adverse consequences such as organ removal and loss of function; while false-negative results of enhanced CT bring delayed treatment, and patients will thus have to bear the adverse consequences of poor prognosis, high treatment costs, poor quality of life, and short survival period. There is an urgent need to find convenient, cost-effective and non-invasive diagnostic methods to reduce the false-positive rate of ultrasound and the false-negative and false-positive rates of enhanced CT in renal tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of YiDiXie-SS, YiDiXie-HS and YiDiXie-D in renal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 298 subjects (malignant group, n=233; benign group, n=65) were finally included in this study. Remaining serum samples from the subjects were collected and tested by applying the YiDiXie all-cancer detection kit to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of YiDiXie-SS, YiDiXie-HS and YiDiXie-D, respectively. RESULTS: The sensitivity of YiDiXie-SS in renal ultrasound-positive patients was 98.3% (95% CI: 95.7% - 99.3%; 229/233) with a specificity of 66.2% (95% CI: 54.0% - 76.5%; 43/65). Compared to the application of enhanced CT alone, sequential use of YiDiXie-SS and CT had comparable sensitivity, but the false positive rate decreased from 21.5% (95% CI: 13.3% - 33.0%; 14/65) to 6.2% (95% CI: 2.4% - 14.8%; 4/65). This means that the application of YiDiXie-SS reduced the false-positive rate of ultrasound by 66.2% (95% CI: 54.0% - 76.5%; 43/65) and the false-positive rate of enhanced CT by 71.4% with essentially no increase in malignancy leakage.The sensitivity of YiDiXie-HS in patients with a negative enhanced CT was 86.1% (95% CI. 71.3% - 93.9%; 31/36) and specificity was 84.3% (95% CI: 72.0% - 91.8%; 43/51). This means that YiDiXie-HS reduced the false-negative rate of enhanced CT by 86.1% (95% CI: 71.3% - 93.9%; 31/36).YiDiXie-D had a sensitivity of 29.4% (95% CI: 23.5% - 36.2%; 58/197) and a specificity of 92.9% (95% CI: 68.5% - 99.6%) in patients with positive enhanced CT. This means that YiDiXie-D reduces the false positive rate of enhanced CT by 92.9% (95% CI: 68.5% - 99.6%; 13/14). CONCLUSION: YiDiXie-SS dramatically reduces the false-positive rate of ultrasound and enhanced CT with essentially no increase in delayed treatment of malignant tumors. YiDiXie-HS dramatically reduces the false-negative rate of enhanced CT. YiDiXie-D dramatically reduces the false-positive rate of enhanced CT. The YiDiXie test has significant diagnostic value in renal tumors, and is expected to solve the 3 problems of \\\"high false-positive rate of ultrasound\\\", \\\"high false-negative rate of enhanced CT\\\" and \\\"high false-positive rate of enhanced CT\\\". Clinical Research Registration Number:ChiCTR2200066840. Keywords:Renal cancer, Ultrasound, Enhanced CT, False-positive, False-negative, YiDiXie-SS, YiDiXie-HS, YiDiXie-D\",\"PeriodicalId\":506788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.28.24310613\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.28.24310613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肾癌严重威胁人类健康,并造成沉重的经济负担。超声波被广泛应用于肾脏肿瘤的筛查或初步诊断,增强 CT 被广泛应用于肾脏肿瘤的诊断。然而,超声和增强 CT 的假阳性结果会给患者带来不必要的精神痛苦、昂贵的检查费用、身体伤害,甚至切除器官、丧失功能等不良后果;而增强 CT 的假阴性结果则会延误治疗,患者因此不得不承担预后差、治疗费用高、生活质量差、生存期短等不良后果。因此,急需找到方便、经济、无创的诊断方法,以降低肾肿瘤超声的假阳性率和增强 CT 的假阴性率和假阳性率。本研究旨在评估 YiDiXie-SS、YiDiXie-HS 和 YiDiXie-D 对肾肿瘤的诊断价值。材料与方法:本研究最终纳入了 298 名受试者(恶性组,n=233;良性组,n=65)。收集受试者的剩余血清样本,并使用 YiDiXie 全癌检测试剂盒分别检测 YiDiXie-SS、YiDiXie-HS 和 YiDiXie-D 的灵敏度和特异性。结果:YiDiXie-SS对肾脏超声阳性患者的敏感性为98.3%(95% CI:95.7% - 99.3%;229/233),特异性为66.2%(95% CI:54.0% - 76.5%;43/65)。与单独使用增强 CT 相比,连续使用 YiDiXie-SS 和 CT 的灵敏度相当,但假阳性率从 21.5% (95% CI: 13.3% - 33.0%; 14/65) 下降到 6.2% (95% CI: 2.4% - 14.8%; 4/65)。这意味着应用 YiDiXie-SS 后,超声检查的假阳性率降低了 66.2% (95% CI: 54.0% - 76.5%; 43/65),增强 CT 的假阳性率降低了 71.YiDiXie-HS 对增强 CT 阴性患者的敏感性为 86.1% (95% CI. 71.3% - 93.9%; 31/36),特异性为 84.3% (95% CI: 72.0% - 91.8%; 43/51)。在增强 CT 呈阳性的患者中,YiDiXie-D 的灵敏度为 29.4%(95% CI:23.5% - 36.2%;58/197),特异性为 92.9%(95% CI:68.5% - 99.6%)。这意味着 YiDiXie-D 可将增强 CT 的假阳性率降低 92.9% (95% CI: 68.5% - 99.6%; 13/14)。结论:YiDiXie-SS 显著降低了超声波和增强 CT 的假阳性率,但基本上没有增加恶性肿瘤的延迟治疗。YiDiXie-HS 显著降低了增强 CT 的假阴性率。YiDiXie-D 显著降低了增强 CT 的假阳性率。YiDiXie检验对肾脏肿瘤具有重要的诊断价值,有望解决 "超声假阳性率高"、"增强CT假阴性率高 "和 "增强CT假阳性率高 "三大难题。临床研究注册号:ChiCTR2200066840。关键词:肾癌 超声 增强CT 假阳性 假阴性 易迪协-SS 易迪协-HS 易迪协-D
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS and YiDiXie™-D in renal cancer
BACKGROUND: Renal cancer is a serious threat to human health and causes heavy economic burden. Ultrasound is widely used in screening or preliminary diagnosis of renal tumors, and enhanced CT is widely used in the diagnosis of renal tumors. However, false-positive results of ultrasound and enhanced CT will bring unnecessary mental pain, expensive examination costs, physical injuries, and even adverse consequences such as organ removal and loss of function; while false-negative results of enhanced CT bring delayed treatment, and patients will thus have to bear the adverse consequences of poor prognosis, high treatment costs, poor quality of life, and short survival period. There is an urgent need to find convenient, cost-effective and non-invasive diagnostic methods to reduce the false-positive rate of ultrasound and the false-negative and false-positive rates of enhanced CT in renal tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of YiDiXie-SS, YiDiXie-HS and YiDiXie-D in renal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 298 subjects (malignant group, n=233; benign group, n=65) were finally included in this study. Remaining serum samples from the subjects were collected and tested by applying the YiDiXie all-cancer detection kit to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of YiDiXie-SS, YiDiXie-HS and YiDiXie-D, respectively. RESULTS: The sensitivity of YiDiXie-SS in renal ultrasound-positive patients was 98.3% (95% CI: 95.7% - 99.3%; 229/233) with a specificity of 66.2% (95% CI: 54.0% - 76.5%; 43/65). Compared to the application of enhanced CT alone, sequential use of YiDiXie-SS and CT had comparable sensitivity, but the false positive rate decreased from 21.5% (95% CI: 13.3% - 33.0%; 14/65) to 6.2% (95% CI: 2.4% - 14.8%; 4/65). This means that the application of YiDiXie-SS reduced the false-positive rate of ultrasound by 66.2% (95% CI: 54.0% - 76.5%; 43/65) and the false-positive rate of enhanced CT by 71.4% with essentially no increase in malignancy leakage.The sensitivity of YiDiXie-HS in patients with a negative enhanced CT was 86.1% (95% CI. 71.3% - 93.9%; 31/36) and specificity was 84.3% (95% CI: 72.0% - 91.8%; 43/51). This means that YiDiXie-HS reduced the false-negative rate of enhanced CT by 86.1% (95% CI: 71.3% - 93.9%; 31/36).YiDiXie-D had a sensitivity of 29.4% (95% CI: 23.5% - 36.2%; 58/197) and a specificity of 92.9% (95% CI: 68.5% - 99.6%) in patients with positive enhanced CT. This means that YiDiXie-D reduces the false positive rate of enhanced CT by 92.9% (95% CI: 68.5% - 99.6%; 13/14). CONCLUSION: YiDiXie-SS dramatically reduces the false-positive rate of ultrasound and enhanced CT with essentially no increase in delayed treatment of malignant tumors. YiDiXie-HS dramatically reduces the false-negative rate of enhanced CT. YiDiXie-D dramatically reduces the false-positive rate of enhanced CT. The YiDiXie test has significant diagnostic value in renal tumors, and is expected to solve the 3 problems of "high false-positive rate of ultrasound", "high false-negative rate of enhanced CT" and "high false-positive rate of enhanced CT". Clinical Research Registration Number:ChiCTR2200066840. Keywords:Renal cancer, Ultrasound, Enhanced CT, False-positive, False-negative, YiDiXie-SS, YiDiXie-HS, YiDiXie-D
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reemergence of Oropouche virus between 2023 and 2024 in Brazil Towards Personalized Breast Cancer Risk Management: A Thai Cohort Study on Polygenic Risk Scores Hot Spring Residency and Disease Association: a Crossover Gene-Environment Interaction (GxE) Study in Taiwan Evaluation of the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS and YiDiXie™-D in renal cancer Dual exposure-by-polygenic score interactions highlight disparities across social groups in the proportion needed to benefit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1