一种基于优化的蒙特卡洛方法,用于估计具有两个成分类别的网络的两端生存特征

Daniel B. Lopes da Silva, K. M. Sullivan
{"title":"一种基于优化的蒙特卡洛方法,用于估计具有两个成分类别的网络的两端生存特征","authors":"Daniel B. Lopes da Silva, K. M. Sullivan","doi":"10.1002/nav.22218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evaluating two‐terminal network reliability is a classical problem with numerous applications. Because this problem is ‐Complete, practical studies involving large systems commonly resort to approximating or estimating system reliability rather than evaluating it exactly. Researchers have characterized signatures, such as the destruction spectrum and survival signature, which summarize the system's structure and give rise to procedures for evaluating or approximating network reliability. These procedures are advantageous if the signature can be computed efficiently; however, computing the signature is challenging for complex systems. With this motivation, we consider the use of Monte Carlo (MC) simulation to estimate the survival signature of a two‐terminal network in which there are two classes of i.i.d. components. In this setting, we prove that each MC replication to estimate the signature of a multi‐class system entails solving a multi‐objective maximum capacity path problem. For the case of two classes of components, we adapt a Dijkstra's‐like bi‐objective shortest path algorithm from the literature for the purpose of solving the resulting bi‐objective maximum capacity path problem. We perform computational experiments to compare our method's efficiency against intuitive benchmark approaches. Our computational results demonstrate that the bi‐objective optimization approach consistently outperforms the benchmark approaches, thereby enabling a larger number of MC replications and improved accuracy of the reliability estimation. Furthermore, the efficiency gains versus benchmark approaches appear to become more significant as the network increases in size.","PeriodicalId":19120,"journal":{"name":"Naval Research Logistics (NRL)","volume":"6 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An optimization‐based Monte Carlo method for estimating the two‐terminal survival signature of networks with two component classes\",\"authors\":\"Daniel B. Lopes da Silva, K. M. Sullivan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nav.22218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Evaluating two‐terminal network reliability is a classical problem with numerous applications. Because this problem is ‐Complete, practical studies involving large systems commonly resort to approximating or estimating system reliability rather than evaluating it exactly. Researchers have characterized signatures, such as the destruction spectrum and survival signature, which summarize the system's structure and give rise to procedures for evaluating or approximating network reliability. These procedures are advantageous if the signature can be computed efficiently; however, computing the signature is challenging for complex systems. With this motivation, we consider the use of Monte Carlo (MC) simulation to estimate the survival signature of a two‐terminal network in which there are two classes of i.i.d. components. In this setting, we prove that each MC replication to estimate the signature of a multi‐class system entails solving a multi‐objective maximum capacity path problem. For the case of two classes of components, we adapt a Dijkstra's‐like bi‐objective shortest path algorithm from the literature for the purpose of solving the resulting bi‐objective maximum capacity path problem. We perform computational experiments to compare our method's efficiency against intuitive benchmark approaches. Our computational results demonstrate that the bi‐objective optimization approach consistently outperforms the benchmark approaches, thereby enabling a larger number of MC replications and improved accuracy of the reliability estimation. Furthermore, the efficiency gains versus benchmark approaches appear to become more significant as the network increases in size.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Naval Research Logistics (NRL)\",\"volume\":\"6 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Naval Research Logistics (NRL)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.22218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naval Research Logistics (NRL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.22218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

评估双终端网络的可靠性是一个经典问题,应用广泛。由于这个问题很复杂,因此涉及大型系统的实际研究通常采用近似或估计系统可靠性的方法,而不是精确地评估系统可靠性。研究人员对破坏谱和生存特征等特征进行了描述,这些特征概括了系统的结构,并产生了评估或近似网络可靠性的程序。如果能高效地计算特征,这些程序就会很有优势;然而,计算特征对于复杂系统来说具有挑战性。基于这一动机,我们考虑使用蒙特卡罗(MC)模拟来估算双终端网络的生存特征,其中有两类 i.i.d. 部件。在这种情况下,我们证明了估计多类系统特征的每次 MC 复制都需要解决一个多目标最大容量路径问题。对于两类组件的情况,我们采用文献中类似于 Dijkstra 的双目标最短路径算法来解决由此产生的双目标最大容量路径问题。我们进行了计算实验,以比较我们的方法与直观基准方法的效率。计算结果表明,双目标优化方法的性能始终优于基准方法,因此可以进行更多的 MC 复制,并提高可靠性估计的准确性。此外,与基准方法相比,随着网络规模的扩大,效率的提高似乎变得更加显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An optimization‐based Monte Carlo method for estimating the two‐terminal survival signature of networks with two component classes
Evaluating two‐terminal network reliability is a classical problem with numerous applications. Because this problem is ‐Complete, practical studies involving large systems commonly resort to approximating or estimating system reliability rather than evaluating it exactly. Researchers have characterized signatures, such as the destruction spectrum and survival signature, which summarize the system's structure and give rise to procedures for evaluating or approximating network reliability. These procedures are advantageous if the signature can be computed efficiently; however, computing the signature is challenging for complex systems. With this motivation, we consider the use of Monte Carlo (MC) simulation to estimate the survival signature of a two‐terminal network in which there are two classes of i.i.d. components. In this setting, we prove that each MC replication to estimate the signature of a multi‐class system entails solving a multi‐objective maximum capacity path problem. For the case of two classes of components, we adapt a Dijkstra's‐like bi‐objective shortest path algorithm from the literature for the purpose of solving the resulting bi‐objective maximum capacity path problem. We perform computational experiments to compare our method's efficiency against intuitive benchmark approaches. Our computational results demonstrate that the bi‐objective optimization approach consistently outperforms the benchmark approaches, thereby enabling a larger number of MC replications and improved accuracy of the reliability estimation. Furthermore, the efficiency gains versus benchmark approaches appear to become more significant as the network increases in size.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assigning parcel destinations to drop‐off points in a congested robotic sorting system An optimization‐based Monte Carlo method for estimating the two‐terminal survival signature of networks with two component classes A two‐stage adaptive robust model for designing a reliable blood supply chain network with disruption considerations in disaster situations Firm decisions and government subsidies in a supply chain with consumer surplus consideration Optimal emission regulation under market uncertainty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1