堤坝破裂参数模型的评估与比较

Getachew Bereta Geremew
{"title":"堤坝破裂参数模型的评估与比较","authors":"Getachew Bereta Geremew","doi":"10.4028/p-z42x2n","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reliable approximations for breach parameters using a parametric model due to embankment dam failure are very significant factors in dam safety and mitigation measures. Therefore, utilizing information on historically unsuccessful embankment dams, several empirical models have been formulated by different researchers. There is still no universal method for calculating the occurrence of dam breaches. The main objective of this research is to evaluate and compare the selected parametric dam breach models that are available in the literature. Four models (Xu et al., Vescher et al., Froehlich, and USB Reclamation) were chosen to forecast the breach event's parameters and peak discharges. Historically, 59 failed embankment dams’ data in various countries around the world were used. In order to assess and compare the breach models and recommend the best-performing model for predicting the peak discharge, breach width, and failure time, ten (10) statistical quantitative indicators were used. The breach model developed by Xu et al. has good performance. Finally, to show the impacts of erodibility, validation, and sensitivity of the selected model, it was checked using eight dams’ data. During the validation, the calculated and observed results were in agreement. Sensitivity revealed that large fluctuations in the breach parameter and peak discharge were seen when the erodibility coefficient increased or decreased.","PeriodicalId":7184,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Engineering Forum","volume":"9 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation and Comparison of Breach Parametric Model for Embankment Dams\",\"authors\":\"Getachew Bereta Geremew\",\"doi\":\"10.4028/p-z42x2n\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reliable approximations for breach parameters using a parametric model due to embankment dam failure are very significant factors in dam safety and mitigation measures. Therefore, utilizing information on historically unsuccessful embankment dams, several empirical models have been formulated by different researchers. There is still no universal method for calculating the occurrence of dam breaches. The main objective of this research is to evaluate and compare the selected parametric dam breach models that are available in the literature. Four models (Xu et al., Vescher et al., Froehlich, and USB Reclamation) were chosen to forecast the breach event's parameters and peak discharges. Historically, 59 failed embankment dams’ data in various countries around the world were used. In order to assess and compare the breach models and recommend the best-performing model for predicting the peak discharge, breach width, and failure time, ten (10) statistical quantitative indicators were used. The breach model developed by Xu et al. has good performance. Finally, to show the impacts of erodibility, validation, and sensitivity of the selected model, it was checked using eight dams’ data. During the validation, the calculated and observed results were in agreement. Sensitivity revealed that large fluctuations in the breach parameter and peak discharge were seen when the erodibility coefficient increased or decreased.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Engineering Forum\",\"volume\":\"9 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Engineering Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4028/p-z42x2n\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Engineering Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4028/p-z42x2n","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用参数模型对堤坝溃决引起的溃口参数进行可靠的近似计算,是大坝安全和减灾措施中非常重要的因素。因此,不同的研究人员利用历史上未成功溃坝的信息,制定了若干经验模型。目前还没有一种通用的方法来计算溃坝的发生率。本研究的主要目的是评估和比较文献中选定的参数溃坝模型。我们选择了四个模型(Xu 等人、Vescher 等人、Froehlich 和 USB Reclamation)来预测溃坝事件的参数和峰值排水量。使用了世界各国 59 座溃坝的历史数据。为了评估和比较溃坝模型,并推荐预测峰值排水量、溃坝宽度和溃坝时间的最佳模型,使用了十(10)个统计量化指标。Xu 等人开发的决口模型性能良好。最后,为了说明所选模型的可侵蚀性、验证性和灵敏度的影响,使用八个大坝的数据对其进行了检验。在验证过程中,计算结果与观测结果一致。灵敏度表明,当侵蚀系数增大或减小时,溃口参数和峰值排水量会出现较大波动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation and Comparison of Breach Parametric Model for Embankment Dams
Reliable approximations for breach parameters using a parametric model due to embankment dam failure are very significant factors in dam safety and mitigation measures. Therefore, utilizing information on historically unsuccessful embankment dams, several empirical models have been formulated by different researchers. There is still no universal method for calculating the occurrence of dam breaches. The main objective of this research is to evaluate and compare the selected parametric dam breach models that are available in the literature. Four models (Xu et al., Vescher et al., Froehlich, and USB Reclamation) were chosen to forecast the breach event's parameters and peak discharges. Historically, 59 failed embankment dams’ data in various countries around the world were used. In order to assess and compare the breach models and recommend the best-performing model for predicting the peak discharge, breach width, and failure time, ten (10) statistical quantitative indicators were used. The breach model developed by Xu et al. has good performance. Finally, to show the impacts of erodibility, validation, and sensitivity of the selected model, it was checked using eight dams’ data. During the validation, the calculated and observed results were in agreement. Sensitivity revealed that large fluctuations in the breach parameter and peak discharge were seen when the erodibility coefficient increased or decreased.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implications of the Global Race to Net-Zero by 2050 for the Strategic Fleet of Coal-Fired Power Plants in SADC Optimum Design of Mix Ratio of Premixed Iron Tailings Mortar Based on Response Surface Method Evaluation and Comparison of Breach Parametric Model for Embankment Dams Numerical Modeling of Cantilever Retaining Wall Using EPS Geofoam An Investigation of the Mechanical and Durability Properties of Hollow Concrete Blocks Made with Copper Mine Tailings as a Partial Cement Replacement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1