社区成员作为设计伙伴:家庭共渡难关计划的协同设计研讨会

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES Family Relations Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1111/fare.13072
Claire A. Rosenberger, Cezanne M. Elias, Yumary Ruiz, Austin L. Toombs, Sohee Lee, Kristine Marceau, Shelley MacDermid Wadsworth, Carly Kimiecik, Lillian Millspaugh, Chloe Cloutier, Lauren Rutherford, Liying Che, Carolyn E. B. McCormick
{"title":"社区成员作为设计伙伴:家庭共渡难关计划的协同设计研讨会","authors":"Claire A. Rosenberger, Cezanne M. Elias, Yumary Ruiz, Austin L. Toombs, Sohee Lee, Kristine Marceau, Shelley MacDermid Wadsworth, Carly Kimiecik, Lillian Millspaugh, Chloe Cloutier, Lauren Rutherford, Liying Che, Carolyn E. B. McCormick","doi":"10.1111/fare.13072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This community‐engaged codesign project identified the changes needed to tailor a family resilience‐building program, the Families Tackling Tough Times Together (FT), into a community setting.There is a need for low‐burden resources to help families mitigate stressful times and build resilience. Guided by Walsh's family resilience framework, FT aims to improve families' ability to cope, recover, and build resilience. Due to the success of FT during the COVID‐19 pandemic, the program is now being modified to help families in the state of Indiana.Three codesign workshops were held with community service providers (CSP) and families. Participants engaged with the FT materials and discussions related to program usability and feasibility. Data were analyzed using a rapid analysis approach.CSPs stated that FT program materials fit with their goals and workload. Families felt the FT program aligned with their personal needs and day‐to‐day lives. Challenges and concerns with the FT materials included activities that required additional resources or that may be intimidating for families to complete. Both CSPs and families provided helpful suggestions on how to modify the materials.The FT program was well received by participants and was viewed as a valuable addition to the services CSPs offer. Modifications will be made to the FT materials based on knowledge gained from the workshops.This work highlights the collaborative nature of the codesign process as well as the insights gained from participants regarding the use of the FT materials by CSPs as part of their routine service delivery with families in the community.","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community members as design partners: Codesign workshops of the families tackling tough times together program\",\"authors\":\"Claire A. Rosenberger, Cezanne M. Elias, Yumary Ruiz, Austin L. Toombs, Sohee Lee, Kristine Marceau, Shelley MacDermid Wadsworth, Carly Kimiecik, Lillian Millspaugh, Chloe Cloutier, Lauren Rutherford, Liying Che, Carolyn E. B. McCormick\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/fare.13072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This community‐engaged codesign project identified the changes needed to tailor a family resilience‐building program, the Families Tackling Tough Times Together (FT), into a community setting.There is a need for low‐burden resources to help families mitigate stressful times and build resilience. Guided by Walsh's family resilience framework, FT aims to improve families' ability to cope, recover, and build resilience. Due to the success of FT during the COVID‐19 pandemic, the program is now being modified to help families in the state of Indiana.Three codesign workshops were held with community service providers (CSP) and families. Participants engaged with the FT materials and discussions related to program usability and feasibility. Data were analyzed using a rapid analysis approach.CSPs stated that FT program materials fit with their goals and workload. Families felt the FT program aligned with their personal needs and day‐to‐day lives. Challenges and concerns with the FT materials included activities that required additional resources or that may be intimidating for families to complete. Both CSPs and families provided helpful suggestions on how to modify the materials.The FT program was well received by participants and was viewed as a valuable addition to the services CSPs offer. Modifications will be made to the FT materials based on knowledge gained from the workshops.This work highlights the collaborative nature of the codesign process as well as the insights gained from participants regarding the use of the FT materials by CSPs as part of their routine service delivery with families in the community.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Relations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.13072\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.13072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这个社区参与的代码设计项目确定了将家庭复原力建设计划 "共渡难关家庭"(FT)融入社区环境所需的改变。在沃尔什的家庭复原力框架指导下,FT 旨在提高家庭应对、恢复和建立复原力的能力。由于 FT 在 COVID-19 大流行期间取得了成功,现在该计划正在进行修改,以帮助印第安纳州的家庭。与会者参与了 FT 材料以及与计划可用性和可行性相关的讨论。社区服务提供者表示,家庭培训计划的材料符合他们的目标和工作量。家庭认为家庭培训计划符合他们的个人需求和日常生活。家庭培训材料的挑战和问题包括需要额外资源的活动,或家庭可能会害怕完成的活动。CSP 和家庭都就如何修改材料提出了有益的建议。"家庭培训 "计划受到了参与者的欢迎,并被视为对 CSP 所提供服务的宝贵补充。这项工作突出了编码设计过程的合作性质,以及参与者对社区服务提供者使用家庭测试材料作为其向社区家庭提供日常服务的一部分的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Community members as design partners: Codesign workshops of the families tackling tough times together program
This community‐engaged codesign project identified the changes needed to tailor a family resilience‐building program, the Families Tackling Tough Times Together (FT), into a community setting.There is a need for low‐burden resources to help families mitigate stressful times and build resilience. Guided by Walsh's family resilience framework, FT aims to improve families' ability to cope, recover, and build resilience. Due to the success of FT during the COVID‐19 pandemic, the program is now being modified to help families in the state of Indiana.Three codesign workshops were held with community service providers (CSP) and families. Participants engaged with the FT materials and discussions related to program usability and feasibility. Data were analyzed using a rapid analysis approach.CSPs stated that FT program materials fit with their goals and workload. Families felt the FT program aligned with their personal needs and day‐to‐day lives. Challenges and concerns with the FT materials included activities that required additional resources or that may be intimidating for families to complete. Both CSPs and families provided helpful suggestions on how to modify the materials.The FT program was well received by participants and was viewed as a valuable addition to the services CSPs offer. Modifications will be made to the FT materials based on knowledge gained from the workshops.This work highlights the collaborative nature of the codesign process as well as the insights gained from participants regarding the use of the FT materials by CSPs as part of their routine service delivery with families in the community.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Family Relations
Family Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Minority stress and relationship satisfaction in same‐sex couples: A meta‐analysis Family bonds at risk: The spillover effects of workplace ostracism in the parent–child relationship Partnering with Reach Out and Read to understand families' experiences with books and their babies Community members as design partners: Codesign workshops of the families tackling tough times together program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1