基于修正系数的非加热空间传热比较研究

IF 3.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Buildings Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI:10.3390/buildings14082283
Wenfang He, Shuaipeng Zhang, Zhenying Wu, Dengjia Wang
{"title":"基于修正系数的非加热空间传热比较研究","authors":"Wenfang He, Shuaipeng Zhang, Zhenying Wu, Dengjia Wang","doi":"10.3390/buildings14082283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The accurate assessment of heat transfer via unheated spaces is an important aspect of calculating the heating load of a building and mitigating its energy consumption and carbon emissions. Currently, the majority of international and national standards employ the correction factor method for the calculation of heat transfer via unheated spaces, categorized into three types: detailed temperature correction factors (b), simplified b-values, and a correction factor (a) of thermal resistance. In order to provide an accurate and efficient evaluation of heat transfer through unheated spaces, this paper conducts a comparative analysis of these three methods using on-site measurements, TRNSYS (version 18) simulations, and analytical calculations. The findings indicate that the use of simplified b-values results in inaccurate predictions of correction factors and heat transfer via unheated balconies, yielding relative discrepancies within the ranges of 0.065 to 0.527 and 12.2% to 111.3%, respectively. Detailed temperature correction factors offer a more precise prediction, exhibiting relative discrepancies of −0.161 to 0.11 and 0.1% to 33.5%. However, the complexity of the calculation process, influenced by dynamically changing climates and solar radiation, necessitates a steady-state assumption to streamline calculations. The use of detailed correction factors of thermal resistance yields more accurate predictions, with relative discrepancies ranging from −0.176 to 0.11 and 0.3% to 33.1%, and it is recommended as the main method for predicting heat transfer via unheated spaces. In addition, it is advised to enhance the thermal resistance correction factor method by considering the influence of radiative heat transfer via transparent envelopes.","PeriodicalId":48546,"journal":{"name":"Buildings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study on the Heat Transfer via Unheated Spaces Based on Correction Factor\",\"authors\":\"Wenfang He, Shuaipeng Zhang, Zhenying Wu, Dengjia Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/buildings14082283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The accurate assessment of heat transfer via unheated spaces is an important aspect of calculating the heating load of a building and mitigating its energy consumption and carbon emissions. Currently, the majority of international and national standards employ the correction factor method for the calculation of heat transfer via unheated spaces, categorized into three types: detailed temperature correction factors (b), simplified b-values, and a correction factor (a) of thermal resistance. In order to provide an accurate and efficient evaluation of heat transfer through unheated spaces, this paper conducts a comparative analysis of these three methods using on-site measurements, TRNSYS (version 18) simulations, and analytical calculations. The findings indicate that the use of simplified b-values results in inaccurate predictions of correction factors and heat transfer via unheated balconies, yielding relative discrepancies within the ranges of 0.065 to 0.527 and 12.2% to 111.3%, respectively. Detailed temperature correction factors offer a more precise prediction, exhibiting relative discrepancies of −0.161 to 0.11 and 0.1% to 33.5%. However, the complexity of the calculation process, influenced by dynamically changing climates and solar radiation, necessitates a steady-state assumption to streamline calculations. The use of detailed correction factors of thermal resistance yields more accurate predictions, with relative discrepancies ranging from −0.176 to 0.11 and 0.3% to 33.1%, and it is recommended as the main method for predicting heat transfer via unheated spaces. In addition, it is advised to enhance the thermal resistance correction factor method by considering the influence of radiative heat transfer via transparent envelopes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Buildings\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Buildings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082283\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082283","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确评估未供暖空间的传热是计算建筑物供暖负荷、降低能耗和碳排放的一个重要方面。目前,大多数国际和国家标准都采用修正系数法计算未采暖空间的传热,修正系数分为三类:详细的温度修正系数 (b)、简化的 b 值和热阻修正系数 (a)。为了准确有效地评估通过非采暖空间的传热,本文使用现场测量、TRNSYS(18 版)模拟和分析计算对这三种方法进行了比较分析。研究结果表明,使用简化的 b 值会导致对修正系数和未采暖阳台传热的预测不准确,产生的相对差异范围分别为 0.065 至 0.527 和 12.2% 至 111.3%。详细的温度修正系数提供了更精确的预测,显示出 -0.161 至 0.11 和 0.1% 至 33.5% 的相对差异。然而,计算过程受动态变化的气候和太阳辐射影响,十分复杂,因此有必要采用稳态假设来简化计算。使用详细的热阻修正系数可获得更准确的预测结果,相对差异范围为-0.176 至 0.11,0.3% 至 33.1%,建议将其作为预测非采暖空间传热的主要方法。此外,建议通过考虑透明围护结构辐射传热的影响来增强热阻修正系数方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Study on the Heat Transfer via Unheated Spaces Based on Correction Factor
The accurate assessment of heat transfer via unheated spaces is an important aspect of calculating the heating load of a building and mitigating its energy consumption and carbon emissions. Currently, the majority of international and national standards employ the correction factor method for the calculation of heat transfer via unheated spaces, categorized into three types: detailed temperature correction factors (b), simplified b-values, and a correction factor (a) of thermal resistance. In order to provide an accurate and efficient evaluation of heat transfer through unheated spaces, this paper conducts a comparative analysis of these three methods using on-site measurements, TRNSYS (version 18) simulations, and analytical calculations. The findings indicate that the use of simplified b-values results in inaccurate predictions of correction factors and heat transfer via unheated balconies, yielding relative discrepancies within the ranges of 0.065 to 0.527 and 12.2% to 111.3%, respectively. Detailed temperature correction factors offer a more precise prediction, exhibiting relative discrepancies of −0.161 to 0.11 and 0.1% to 33.5%. However, the complexity of the calculation process, influenced by dynamically changing climates and solar radiation, necessitates a steady-state assumption to streamline calculations. The use of detailed correction factors of thermal resistance yields more accurate predictions, with relative discrepancies ranging from −0.176 to 0.11 and 0.3% to 33.1%, and it is recommended as the main method for predicting heat transfer via unheated spaces. In addition, it is advised to enhance the thermal resistance correction factor method by considering the influence of radiative heat transfer via transparent envelopes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Buildings
Buildings Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
26.30%
发文量
1883
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: BUILDINGS content is primarily staff-written and submitted information is evaluated by the editors for its value to the audience. Such information may be used in articles with appropriate attribution to the source. The editorial staff considers information on the following topics: -Issues directed at building owners and facility managers in North America -Issues relevant to existing buildings, including retrofits, maintenance and modernization -Solution-based content, such as tips and tricks -New construction but only with an eye to issues involving maintenance and operation We generally do not review the following topics because these are not relevant to our readers: -Information on the residential market with the exception of multifamily buildings -International news unrelated to the North American market -Real estate market updates or construction updates
期刊最新文献
Behavior of Lightweight Self-Compacting Concrete with Recycled Tire Steel Fibers Examination of the Release of Heavy Metals from Self-Hardening Slurries with Fly Ash from Municipal Sewage Sludge Incineration, Considering the Character of Its Operation in a Cut-Off Wall Evaluating the Impact of CO2 on Calcium SulphoAluminate (CSA) Concrete Exploring the Readiness of Organisations to Adopt Artificial Intelligence Impact of Night Ventilation on Indoor Thermal Environment of Residential Buildings under the Dual Carbon Target: A Case Study of Xi’an
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1