意大利临床伦理现状

Q2 Arts and Humanities Medicina e Morale Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.4081/mem.2024.1295
Costanza Raimondi, P. Refolo, A. G. Spagnolo
{"title":"意大利临床伦理现状","authors":"Costanza Raimondi, P. Refolo, A. G. Spagnolo","doi":"10.4081/mem.2024.1295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Italy has seen limited growth and institutionalization of clinical ethics activities in its territory. Only a few observational studies were conducted in Italy to assess the state of the art of clinical ethics services and activities. Aim: We sought to gain a broad and comprehensive understanding of the state of the art as perceived by Italian healthcare institutions and facilities. Methods: We prepared a questionnaire comprising of twelve close-ended and six open-ended questions. We sent it to all Local Healthcare Authorities (Aziende Sanitarie Locali, ASL), all private Scientific Institutes for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare (Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, IRCCS), and all hospices throughout Italy. Out of 380 facilities, 90 of them (22.5%) responded to it. Results: All answers revealed interesting data. Among them, the ones that stood are: when asked who they turn to when an ethical dilemma arises, 27.7% of the respondents checked more than two answers, thus showing that there is not one clear and unequivocal body of reference. When asked if there are standard procedures, 55.4% of the respondents declared that there are no standard procedures. Only 4.4% of respondents declared the method of analysis being used. 53.3% responded that their hospital or healthcare facility does not regularly offer training activities and formation to deal with ethical dilemmas Conclusion: The three topics that stand out are a great fragmentation, the need to formalize and establish dedicated services to take care of ethical dilemmas and to offer training and formation to healthcare providers.","PeriodicalId":36708,"journal":{"name":"Medicina e Morale","volume":"47 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The current scenario of clinical ethics in Italy\",\"authors\":\"Costanza Raimondi, P. Refolo, A. G. Spagnolo\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/mem.2024.1295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Italy has seen limited growth and institutionalization of clinical ethics activities in its territory. Only a few observational studies were conducted in Italy to assess the state of the art of clinical ethics services and activities. Aim: We sought to gain a broad and comprehensive understanding of the state of the art as perceived by Italian healthcare institutions and facilities. Methods: We prepared a questionnaire comprising of twelve close-ended and six open-ended questions. We sent it to all Local Healthcare Authorities (Aziende Sanitarie Locali, ASL), all private Scientific Institutes for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare (Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, IRCCS), and all hospices throughout Italy. Out of 380 facilities, 90 of them (22.5%) responded to it. Results: All answers revealed interesting data. Among them, the ones that stood are: when asked who they turn to when an ethical dilemma arises, 27.7% of the respondents checked more than two answers, thus showing that there is not one clear and unequivocal body of reference. When asked if there are standard procedures, 55.4% of the respondents declared that there are no standard procedures. Only 4.4% of respondents declared the method of analysis being used. 53.3% responded that their hospital or healthcare facility does not regularly offer training activities and formation to deal with ethical dilemmas Conclusion: The three topics that stand out are a great fragmentation, the need to formalize and establish dedicated services to take care of ethical dilemmas and to offer training and formation to healthcare providers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina e Morale\",\"volume\":\"47 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina e Morale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2024.1295\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina e Morale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2024.1295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:意大利境内临床伦理活动的发展和制度化程度有限。在意大利,只有少数观察性研究对临床伦理服务和活动的现状进行了评估。目的:我们试图广泛而全面地了解意大利医疗机构和设施眼中的临床伦理现状。调查方法我们准备了一份调查问卷,其中包括 12 个封闭式问题和 6 个开放式问题。我们向意大利全国所有地方医疗机构(Aziende Sanitarie Locali,ASL)、所有私立科研、住院和医疗保健机构(Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattereo Scientifico,IRCCS)以及所有临终关怀机构发送了问卷。在 380 家机构中,有 90 家(22.5%)做出了回应。结果:所有答复都揭示了有趣的数据。其中最突出的是:当被问及出现伦理困境时向谁求助时,27.7% 的受访者勾选了两个以上的答案,这表明并没有一个清晰明确的参考机构。当被问及是否有标准程序时,55.4% 的受访者表示没有标准程序。只有 4.4%的受访者说明了所使用的分析方法。53.3% 的受访者表示,他们所在的医院或医疗机构没有定期提供培训活动和处理伦理困境的培训:突出的三个问题是:存在严重的分散现象;有必要将处理伦理困境的专门服务正规化并建立起来;以及有必要为医疗服务提供者提供培训和培养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The current scenario of clinical ethics in Italy
Background: Italy has seen limited growth and institutionalization of clinical ethics activities in its territory. Only a few observational studies were conducted in Italy to assess the state of the art of clinical ethics services and activities. Aim: We sought to gain a broad and comprehensive understanding of the state of the art as perceived by Italian healthcare institutions and facilities. Methods: We prepared a questionnaire comprising of twelve close-ended and six open-ended questions. We sent it to all Local Healthcare Authorities (Aziende Sanitarie Locali, ASL), all private Scientific Institutes for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare (Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, IRCCS), and all hospices throughout Italy. Out of 380 facilities, 90 of them (22.5%) responded to it. Results: All answers revealed interesting data. Among them, the ones that stood are: when asked who they turn to when an ethical dilemma arises, 27.7% of the respondents checked more than two answers, thus showing that there is not one clear and unequivocal body of reference. When asked if there are standard procedures, 55.4% of the respondents declared that there are no standard procedures. Only 4.4% of respondents declared the method of analysis being used. 53.3% responded that their hospital or healthcare facility does not regularly offer training activities and formation to deal with ethical dilemmas Conclusion: The three topics that stand out are a great fragmentation, the need to formalize and establish dedicated services to take care of ethical dilemmas and to offer training and formation to healthcare providers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina e Morale
Medicina e Morale Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Contragestation or hidden abortion Consent in the psychotherapy setting Protection of animal welfare and regulation of animal experimentation Antiandrogens in the treatment of violent sexual behavior: ethical reflections Continuing care unit: new therapeutic and care solution in terminal illness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1