{"title":"意大利临床伦理现状","authors":"Costanza Raimondi, P. Refolo, A. G. Spagnolo","doi":"10.4081/mem.2024.1295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Italy has seen limited growth and institutionalization of clinical ethics activities in its territory. Only a few observational studies were conducted in Italy to assess the state of the art of clinical ethics services and activities. Aim: We sought to gain a broad and comprehensive understanding of the state of the art as perceived by Italian healthcare institutions and facilities. Methods: We prepared a questionnaire comprising of twelve close-ended and six open-ended questions. We sent it to all Local Healthcare Authorities (Aziende Sanitarie Locali, ASL), all private Scientific Institutes for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare (Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, IRCCS), and all hospices throughout Italy. Out of 380 facilities, 90 of them (22.5%) responded to it. Results: All answers revealed interesting data. Among them, the ones that stood are: when asked who they turn to when an ethical dilemma arises, 27.7% of the respondents checked more than two answers, thus showing that there is not one clear and unequivocal body of reference. When asked if there are standard procedures, 55.4% of the respondents declared that there are no standard procedures. Only 4.4% of respondents declared the method of analysis being used. 53.3% responded that their hospital or healthcare facility does not regularly offer training activities and formation to deal with ethical dilemmas Conclusion: The three topics that stand out are a great fragmentation, the need to formalize and establish dedicated services to take care of ethical dilemmas and to offer training and formation to healthcare providers.","PeriodicalId":36708,"journal":{"name":"Medicina e Morale","volume":"47 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The current scenario of clinical ethics in Italy\",\"authors\":\"Costanza Raimondi, P. Refolo, A. G. Spagnolo\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/mem.2024.1295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Italy has seen limited growth and institutionalization of clinical ethics activities in its territory. Only a few observational studies were conducted in Italy to assess the state of the art of clinical ethics services and activities. Aim: We sought to gain a broad and comprehensive understanding of the state of the art as perceived by Italian healthcare institutions and facilities. Methods: We prepared a questionnaire comprising of twelve close-ended and six open-ended questions. We sent it to all Local Healthcare Authorities (Aziende Sanitarie Locali, ASL), all private Scientific Institutes for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare (Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, IRCCS), and all hospices throughout Italy. Out of 380 facilities, 90 of them (22.5%) responded to it. Results: All answers revealed interesting data. Among them, the ones that stood are: when asked who they turn to when an ethical dilemma arises, 27.7% of the respondents checked more than two answers, thus showing that there is not one clear and unequivocal body of reference. When asked if there are standard procedures, 55.4% of the respondents declared that there are no standard procedures. Only 4.4% of respondents declared the method of analysis being used. 53.3% responded that their hospital or healthcare facility does not regularly offer training activities and formation to deal with ethical dilemmas Conclusion: The three topics that stand out are a great fragmentation, the need to formalize and establish dedicated services to take care of ethical dilemmas and to offer training and formation to healthcare providers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina e Morale\",\"volume\":\"47 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina e Morale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2024.1295\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina e Morale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2024.1295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:意大利境内临床伦理活动的发展和制度化程度有限。在意大利,只有少数观察性研究对临床伦理服务和活动的现状进行了评估。目的:我们试图广泛而全面地了解意大利医疗机构和设施眼中的临床伦理现状。调查方法我们准备了一份调查问卷,其中包括 12 个封闭式问题和 6 个开放式问题。我们向意大利全国所有地方医疗机构(Aziende Sanitarie Locali,ASL)、所有私立科研、住院和医疗保健机构(Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattereo Scientifico,IRCCS)以及所有临终关怀机构发送了问卷。在 380 家机构中,有 90 家(22.5%)做出了回应。结果:所有答复都揭示了有趣的数据。其中最突出的是:当被问及出现伦理困境时向谁求助时,27.7% 的受访者勾选了两个以上的答案,这表明并没有一个清晰明确的参考机构。当被问及是否有标准程序时,55.4% 的受访者表示没有标准程序。只有 4.4%的受访者说明了所使用的分析方法。53.3% 的受访者表示,他们所在的医院或医疗机构没有定期提供培训活动和处理伦理困境的培训:突出的三个问题是:存在严重的分散现象;有必要将处理伦理困境的专门服务正规化并建立起来;以及有必要为医疗服务提供者提供培训和培养。
Background: Italy has seen limited growth and institutionalization of clinical ethics activities in its territory. Only a few observational studies were conducted in Italy to assess the state of the art of clinical ethics services and activities. Aim: We sought to gain a broad and comprehensive understanding of the state of the art as perceived by Italian healthcare institutions and facilities. Methods: We prepared a questionnaire comprising of twelve close-ended and six open-ended questions. We sent it to all Local Healthcare Authorities (Aziende Sanitarie Locali, ASL), all private Scientific Institutes for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare (Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, IRCCS), and all hospices throughout Italy. Out of 380 facilities, 90 of them (22.5%) responded to it. Results: All answers revealed interesting data. Among them, the ones that stood are: when asked who they turn to when an ethical dilemma arises, 27.7% of the respondents checked more than two answers, thus showing that there is not one clear and unequivocal body of reference. When asked if there are standard procedures, 55.4% of the respondents declared that there are no standard procedures. Only 4.4% of respondents declared the method of analysis being used. 53.3% responded that their hospital or healthcare facility does not regularly offer training activities and formation to deal with ethical dilemmas Conclusion: The three topics that stand out are a great fragmentation, the need to formalize and establish dedicated services to take care of ethical dilemmas and to offer training and formation to healthcare providers.