{"title":"在 Z. N. 吉皮乌斯的散文 \"魔鬼的玩偶 \"和 \"罗曼-察列维奇 \"中,可怕是虚无的象征","authors":"I. Ivanova, Artyom Vladimirovich Kuznecov","doi":"10.30853/phil20240315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study is to describe the modus of artistry \"the terrible \" in the novel dilogy of Z. N. Gippius \"The Devil's Doll\" and \"Roman Tsarevich\". The article describes the demonic in the work of Z. N. Gippius. It is revealed that the categories \"the vulgar\" and \"the demonic\" in the works of Z. N. Gippius are sometimes synonymous, their content is characterized by the emptiness of life, which proceeds as a continuance, not duration. The category of \"the terrible\" described by Z. According to Freud, the article is presented as a modus of artistry, in which Z. N. Gippius finds expression the demonic/void (non-existent). The scientific novelty of the research lies in the identified and described features of the \"terrible\" modus of artistry and its application to the analysis of a literary text. Currently, the \"terrible\" category is being used for research on cinema and Gothic literature. In our work, we show that the \"the terrible\" can occur outside the horror genre and at the same time play a significant role in the work. As a result of the study, it was shown that the entropy motif characteristic of the modern era in the work of Z. N. Gippius is expressed in the modi of the vulgar and the demonic. The article proposes a literary interpretation of the aesthetic category \"the terrible\" and analyzes the novel dilogy of Z. N. Gippius through the prism of the designated modus of artistry. The question was raised about the separation of the terrible, the horrible and the frightful as the modi of artistry with their own peculiarities of representing man and the world.","PeriodicalId":508324,"journal":{"name":"Philology. Issues of Theory and Practice","volume":"4 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The terrible as a sign of the void in the Z. N. Gippius dilogy \\\"The Devil's Doll\\\" and \\\"Roman Tsarevich\\\"\",\"authors\":\"I. Ivanova, Artyom Vladimirovich Kuznecov\",\"doi\":\"10.30853/phil20240315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of the study is to describe the modus of artistry \\\"the terrible \\\" in the novel dilogy of Z. N. Gippius \\\"The Devil's Doll\\\" and \\\"Roman Tsarevich\\\". The article describes the demonic in the work of Z. N. Gippius. It is revealed that the categories \\\"the vulgar\\\" and \\\"the demonic\\\" in the works of Z. N. Gippius are sometimes synonymous, their content is characterized by the emptiness of life, which proceeds as a continuance, not duration. The category of \\\"the terrible\\\" described by Z. According to Freud, the article is presented as a modus of artistry, in which Z. N. Gippius finds expression the demonic/void (non-existent). The scientific novelty of the research lies in the identified and described features of the \\\"terrible\\\" modus of artistry and its application to the analysis of a literary text. Currently, the \\\"terrible\\\" category is being used for research on cinema and Gothic literature. In our work, we show that the \\\"the terrible\\\" can occur outside the horror genre and at the same time play a significant role in the work. As a result of the study, it was shown that the entropy motif characteristic of the modern era in the work of Z. N. Gippius is expressed in the modi of the vulgar and the demonic. The article proposes a literary interpretation of the aesthetic category \\\"the terrible\\\" and analyzes the novel dilogy of Z. N. Gippius through the prism of the designated modus of artistry. The question was raised about the separation of the terrible, the horrible and the frightful as the modi of artistry with their own peculiarities of representing man and the world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philology. Issues of Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\"4 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philology. Issues of Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20240315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philology. Issues of Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20240315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是描述茨-尼-吉皮乌斯的长篇小说《魔鬼玩偶》和《罗曼-察列维奇》中 "可怕 "的艺术手法。文章描述了吉皮乌斯作品中的恶魔。文章揭示了茨-尼-吉皮乌斯作品中的 "庸俗 "和 "恶魔 "有时是同义词,其内容以生命的虚无为特征,生命是延续而非持续的。根据弗洛伊德的观点,Z.N.吉皮乌斯描述的 "可怕的 "范畴是作为一种艺术方式呈现的,在这种艺术方式中,Z.N.吉皮乌斯找到了恶魔/虚无(不存在)的表达方式。该研究的科学新颖性在于确定和描述了 "可怕 "的艺术方式的特征,并将其应用于文学文本的分析。目前,"可怕 "类别被用于电影和哥特文学的研究。在我们的工作中,我们表明 "可怕 "可以发生在恐怖类型之外,同时在作品中发挥重要作用。研究结果表明,Z. N. 吉皮乌斯作品中具有现代特征的熵主题是通过庸俗和恶魔的模态表现出来的。文章提出了对 "可怕 "这一美学范畴的文学解释,并通过指定的艺术模式棱镜分析了 Z. N. 吉皮乌斯的小说《稀释》。文章提出了一个问题,即如何将 "可怕的"、"恐怖的 "和 "可怕的 "区分开来,因为它们都是艺术形式,在表现人和世界方面各有特点。
The terrible as a sign of the void in the Z. N. Gippius dilogy "The Devil's Doll" and "Roman Tsarevich"
The purpose of the study is to describe the modus of artistry "the terrible " in the novel dilogy of Z. N. Gippius "The Devil's Doll" and "Roman Tsarevich". The article describes the demonic in the work of Z. N. Gippius. It is revealed that the categories "the vulgar" and "the demonic" in the works of Z. N. Gippius are sometimes synonymous, their content is characterized by the emptiness of life, which proceeds as a continuance, not duration. The category of "the terrible" described by Z. According to Freud, the article is presented as a modus of artistry, in which Z. N. Gippius finds expression the demonic/void (non-existent). The scientific novelty of the research lies in the identified and described features of the "terrible" modus of artistry and its application to the analysis of a literary text. Currently, the "terrible" category is being used for research on cinema and Gothic literature. In our work, we show that the "the terrible" can occur outside the horror genre and at the same time play a significant role in the work. As a result of the study, it was shown that the entropy motif characteristic of the modern era in the work of Z. N. Gippius is expressed in the modi of the vulgar and the demonic. The article proposes a literary interpretation of the aesthetic category "the terrible" and analyzes the novel dilogy of Z. N. Gippius through the prism of the designated modus of artistry. The question was raised about the separation of the terrible, the horrible and the frightful as the modi of artistry with their own peculiarities of representing man and the world.