Salvatore Simone Masilla, B. Fionda, E. Placidi, M. Pagliara, Aniello Viscido, M. Blasi, Barbara Corsano, L. Tagliaferri, A. G. Spagnolo
{"title":"为接受介入放射治疗(近距离放射治疗)的葡萄膜黑色素瘤孕妇制定共同护理计划","authors":"Salvatore Simone Masilla, B. Fionda, E. Placidi, M. Pagliara, Aniello Viscido, M. Blasi, Barbara Corsano, L. Tagliaferri, A. G. Spagnolo","doi":"10.4081/mem.2024.1299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most prevalent primary intraocular tumor in adulthood, with an important risk of metastasis, notably to the liver, rendering standard chemotherapy ineffective. Cases of UM onset during pregnancy are rare but can exhibit accelerated tumor growth. For these cases the best conservative treatment is interventional radiotherapy (IRT) also known as brachytherapy (BT). It is a form of radiotherapy that demonstrates efficacy comparable to the more common enucleation, while mitigating any risks of intrauterine toxicity. Objective: We reported the case of M., a 39-year-old pregnant patient, diagnosed with UM and undergoing brachytherapy treatment. Our aim is to make pertinent ethical considerations about: a. The ethical and clinical approach favouring a treatment strategy that preserves the affected organ and its functionality, b. The advance care planning process conducted within a multidisciplinary team. Case discussion: With the objective of preserving the mother’s health and ensuring the protection of the foetus, the team unanimously agreed, through a collaborative decision-making process, to proceed with the viable brachytherapy intervention. This approach results in a lower burden and maximizes benefits for both the patient and the unborn child. Conclusions: Considering a holistic evaluation, especially considering the patient’s pregnancy, the multidisciplinary approach proves fundamental. Collaboration between bioethicists and health-care professionals facilitated the development of a shared document for healthcare ethics planning, expressing the team’s ethical-clinical considerations.","PeriodicalId":36708,"journal":{"name":"Medicina e Morale","volume":"10 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shared Care Planning for a pregnant patient with uveal melanoma treated with interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy)\",\"authors\":\"Salvatore Simone Masilla, B. Fionda, E. Placidi, M. Pagliara, Aniello Viscido, M. Blasi, Barbara Corsano, L. Tagliaferri, A. G. Spagnolo\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/mem.2024.1299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most prevalent primary intraocular tumor in adulthood, with an important risk of metastasis, notably to the liver, rendering standard chemotherapy ineffective. Cases of UM onset during pregnancy are rare but can exhibit accelerated tumor growth. For these cases the best conservative treatment is interventional radiotherapy (IRT) also known as brachytherapy (BT). It is a form of radiotherapy that demonstrates efficacy comparable to the more common enucleation, while mitigating any risks of intrauterine toxicity. Objective: We reported the case of M., a 39-year-old pregnant patient, diagnosed with UM and undergoing brachytherapy treatment. Our aim is to make pertinent ethical considerations about: a. The ethical and clinical approach favouring a treatment strategy that preserves the affected organ and its functionality, b. The advance care planning process conducted within a multidisciplinary team. Case discussion: With the objective of preserving the mother’s health and ensuring the protection of the foetus, the team unanimously agreed, through a collaborative decision-making process, to proceed with the viable brachytherapy intervention. This approach results in a lower burden and maximizes benefits for both the patient and the unborn child. Conclusions: Considering a holistic evaluation, especially considering the patient’s pregnancy, the multidisciplinary approach proves fundamental. Collaboration between bioethicists and health-care professionals facilitated the development of a shared document for healthcare ethics planning, expressing the team’s ethical-clinical considerations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina e Morale\",\"volume\":\"10 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina e Morale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2024.1299\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina e Morale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2024.1299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介葡萄膜黑色素瘤(UM)是成年期最常见的原发性眼内肿瘤,有很大的转移风险,尤其是转移到肝脏,导致标准化疗无效。在怀孕期间发病的 UM 病例很少见,但会出现肿瘤加速生长的情况。对于这些病例,最好的保守治疗方法是介入放射治疗(IRT),也称为近距离放射治疗(BT)。这是一种放射治疗方式,其疗效可与更常见的去核疗法媲美,同时还能降低宫内毒性的风险。目的:我们报告了 M.的病例,她是一名 39 岁的孕妇,被诊断出患有子宫内膜癌并正在接受近距离放射治疗。我们的目的是就以下方面提出相关的伦理考虑:a. 支持保留受影响器官及其功能的治疗策略的伦理和临床方法;b. 在多学科团队内进行的预先护理计划过程。病例讨论:为了保护母亲的健康并确保胎儿得到保护,团队通过合作决策过程一致同意进行可行的近距离放射治疗干预。这种方法减轻了患者和胎儿的负担,并为他们带来了最大的益处。结论:考虑到整体评估,尤其是考虑到患者的怀孕情况,多学科方法证明是至关重要的。生命伦理学专家和医护人员之间的合作促进了医疗伦理规划共享文件的制定,表达了团队在伦理和临床方面的考虑。
Shared Care Planning for a pregnant patient with uveal melanoma treated with interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy)
Introduction: Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most prevalent primary intraocular tumor in adulthood, with an important risk of metastasis, notably to the liver, rendering standard chemotherapy ineffective. Cases of UM onset during pregnancy are rare but can exhibit accelerated tumor growth. For these cases the best conservative treatment is interventional radiotherapy (IRT) also known as brachytherapy (BT). It is a form of radiotherapy that demonstrates efficacy comparable to the more common enucleation, while mitigating any risks of intrauterine toxicity. Objective: We reported the case of M., a 39-year-old pregnant patient, diagnosed with UM and undergoing brachytherapy treatment. Our aim is to make pertinent ethical considerations about: a. The ethical and clinical approach favouring a treatment strategy that preserves the affected organ and its functionality, b. The advance care planning process conducted within a multidisciplinary team. Case discussion: With the objective of preserving the mother’s health and ensuring the protection of the foetus, the team unanimously agreed, through a collaborative decision-making process, to proceed with the viable brachytherapy intervention. This approach results in a lower burden and maximizes benefits for both the patient and the unborn child. Conclusions: Considering a holistic evaluation, especially considering the patient’s pregnancy, the multidisciplinary approach proves fundamental. Collaboration between bioethicists and health-care professionals facilitated the development of a shared document for healthcare ethics planning, expressing the team’s ethical-clinical considerations.