改编并验证 EPLIT,以评估巴西医院的精益医疗成熟度

IF 3.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL International Journal of Lean Six Sigma Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1108/ijlss-10-2023-0166
Alice Sarantopoulos, Gabriela Spagnol, Maria Rosa Colombrini, Leticia Minatogawa, Vinicius Minatogawa, R. Gasparino, Li Li Min
{"title":"改编并验证 EPLIT,以评估巴西医院的精益医疗成熟度","authors":"Alice Sarantopoulos, Gabriela Spagnol, Maria Rosa Colombrini, Leticia Minatogawa, Vinicius Minatogawa, R. Gasparino, Li Li Min","doi":"10.1108/ijlss-10-2023-0166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to evaluate the measurement properties of the Employee Perception to Assess the Lean Implementation Tool (EPLIT) in the Brazilian hospital context.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA cross-sectional study was conducted in two Brazilian hospitals, adhering to COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and Cronbach's alpha were used for construct validity and reliability.\n\n\nFindings\nThe adapted tool comprises 27 items across five domains, explaining 63.3% of the variance. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.78 to 0.86, indicating satisfactory reliability.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nLimitations include convenience sampling and exclusive use of EFA for validation. Future studies may employ Confirmatory Factor Analysis for further validation.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe tool aids healthcare managers in Brazil to systematically evaluate Lean implementation, contributing to process optimization and quality improvement.\n\n\nSocial implications\nEffective Lean implementation using the validated tool could lead to improved healthcare delivery and patient outcomes.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis is the first study to adapt and validate EPLIT for the Brazilian healthcare sector, offering a robust tool for managers and researchers.\n","PeriodicalId":48601,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Lean Six Sigma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adapting and validating the EPLIT for assessing lean healthcare maturity in Brazilian hospitals\",\"authors\":\"Alice Sarantopoulos, Gabriela Spagnol, Maria Rosa Colombrini, Leticia Minatogawa, Vinicius Minatogawa, R. Gasparino, Li Li Min\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijlss-10-2023-0166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis paper aims to evaluate the measurement properties of the Employee Perception to Assess the Lean Implementation Tool (EPLIT) in the Brazilian hospital context.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nA cross-sectional study was conducted in two Brazilian hospitals, adhering to COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and Cronbach's alpha were used for construct validity and reliability.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe adapted tool comprises 27 items across five domains, explaining 63.3% of the variance. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.78 to 0.86, indicating satisfactory reliability.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nLimitations include convenience sampling and exclusive use of EFA for validation. Future studies may employ Confirmatory Factor Analysis for further validation.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe tool aids healthcare managers in Brazil to systematically evaluate Lean implementation, contributing to process optimization and quality improvement.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nEffective Lean implementation using the validated tool could lead to improved healthcare delivery and patient outcomes.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis is the first study to adapt and validate EPLIT for the Brazilian healthcare sector, offering a robust tool for managers and researchers.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":48601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Lean Six Sigma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Lean Six Sigma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlss-10-2023-0166\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Lean Six Sigma","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlss-10-2023-0166","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本文旨在评估巴西医院环境下员工感知评估精益实施工具(EPLIT)的测量属性。设计/方法/途径 在巴西两家医院开展了一项横断面研究,研究遵循了基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)指南。探索性因子分析(EFA)和 Cronbach's alpha 被用于衡量结构效度和可靠性。研究结果改编后的工具包括五个领域的 27 个项目,解释了 63.3% 的方差。Cronbach's alpha 介于 0.78 至 0.86 之间,表明可靠性令人满意。研究局限性/意义局限性包括方便取样和仅使用 EFA 进行验证。该工具可帮助巴西的医疗管理人员系统地评估精益生产的实施情况,从而促进流程优化和质量改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adapting and validating the EPLIT for assessing lean healthcare maturity in Brazilian hospitals
Purpose This paper aims to evaluate the measurement properties of the Employee Perception to Assess the Lean Implementation Tool (EPLIT) in the Brazilian hospital context. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional study was conducted in two Brazilian hospitals, adhering to COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and Cronbach's alpha were used for construct validity and reliability. Findings The adapted tool comprises 27 items across five domains, explaining 63.3% of the variance. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.78 to 0.86, indicating satisfactory reliability. Research limitations/implications Limitations include convenience sampling and exclusive use of EFA for validation. Future studies may employ Confirmatory Factor Analysis for further validation. Practical implications The tool aids healthcare managers in Brazil to systematically evaluate Lean implementation, contributing to process optimization and quality improvement. Social implications Effective Lean implementation using the validated tool could lead to improved healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. Originality/value This is the first study to adapt and validate EPLIT for the Brazilian healthcare sector, offering a robust tool for managers and researchers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Lean Six Sigma
International Journal of Lean Six Sigma Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Launched in 2010, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma publishes original, empirical and review papers, case studies and theoretical frameworks or models related to Lean and Six Sigma methodologies. High quality submissions are sought from academics, researchers, practitioners and leading management consultants from around the world. Research, case studies and examples can be cited from manufacturing, service and public sectors. This includes manufacturing, health, financial services, local government, education, professional services, IT Services, transport, etc.
期刊最新文献
Overall lean and green effectiveness based on the environmentally sustainable value stream mapping adapted to agribusiness Quality improvement of magnetron in Company T based on Six Sigma Adapting and validating the EPLIT for assessing lean healthcare maturity in Brazilian hospitals Quality improvement development in Swedish healthcare and welfare services Adopting Industry 4.0 technologies through lean tools: evidence from the European Manufacturing Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1