{"title":"用象征主义(V. Bryusov)和概念主义(D. A. Prigov)诠释普希金作品的具体方法","authors":"E. Zhilene","doi":"10.30853/phil20240316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study is to identify the figurative-motional and structural-compositional features of the appeal of the symbolist poet V. Bryusov and the conceptual poet D. Prigov to the personality and work of A. S. Pushkin, to the Pushkin myth as a sign of the continuation of the literary tradition. The article examines not only the formal features of the Bryusov and Prigov Pushkin’s works, but also their content and semantic layers, revealing visible differences in the reception of the image of the genius of Russian literature, dictated by differences not only epoch-making, but also theoretical and literary. The scientific novelty of the work consists in the fact that for the first time the author proposes to consider the ways of addressing the personality and creativity of A. Pushkin as a single continuous process that overcomes the attitudes of anyliterary trends and trends up to conceptualism. The power of Pushkin’s word is so great that it turns out to be stronger than the attitude towards non-ideality, and the appeal to the image of Pushkin overcomes even the proclamation of the author's death, which is confirmed by D. Prigov’s Pushkiniana. As a result of the study, it was found that the tradition of referring to the Pushkin word is alive and continuous, that it reflects the peculiarities of each epoch and the course of development of the literary process, and also that, contrary to the manifestational statements of conceptualists about the lack of ideas of “objects” and total play with the fragments of socialist realist canons, Prigov’s poetry already at an early stage demonstrated a capacious semantic potential that overcomes the limits conceptual practices.","PeriodicalId":508324,"journal":{"name":"Philology. Issues of Theory and Practice","volume":"72 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The specifics of the interpretation of Pushkin’s work in symbolism (V. Bryusov) and conceptualism (D. A. Prigov)\",\"authors\":\"E. Zhilene\",\"doi\":\"10.30853/phil20240316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of the study is to identify the figurative-motional and structural-compositional features of the appeal of the symbolist poet V. Bryusov and the conceptual poet D. Prigov to the personality and work of A. S. Pushkin, to the Pushkin myth as a sign of the continuation of the literary tradition. The article examines not only the formal features of the Bryusov and Prigov Pushkin’s works, but also their content and semantic layers, revealing visible differences in the reception of the image of the genius of Russian literature, dictated by differences not only epoch-making, but also theoretical and literary. The scientific novelty of the work consists in the fact that for the first time the author proposes to consider the ways of addressing the personality and creativity of A. Pushkin as a single continuous process that overcomes the attitudes of anyliterary trends and trends up to conceptualism. The power of Pushkin’s word is so great that it turns out to be stronger than the attitude towards non-ideality, and the appeal to the image of Pushkin overcomes even the proclamation of the author's death, which is confirmed by D. Prigov’s Pushkiniana. As a result of the study, it was found that the tradition of referring to the Pushkin word is alive and continuous, that it reflects the peculiarities of each epoch and the course of development of the literary process, and also that, contrary to the manifestational statements of conceptualists about the lack of ideas of “objects” and total play with the fragments of socialist realist canons, Prigov’s poetry already at an early stage demonstrated a capacious semantic potential that overcomes the limits conceptual practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philology. Issues of Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\"72 20\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philology. Issues of Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20240316\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philology. Issues of Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20240316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究的目的是确定象征主义诗人弗-布留索夫和观念诗人德-普里戈夫对阿-斯-普希金的人格和作品、对作为文学传统延续标志的普希金神话的诉求的形象-情感和结构-构成特征。文章不仅研究了布留索夫和普里戈夫-普希金作品的形式特征,还研究了其内容和语义层,揭示了俄罗斯文学天才形象接受过程中的明显差异,这种差异不仅是由时代性差异决定的,也是由理论和文学差异决定的。这部作品的科学新颖性在于,作者首次提出将探讨阿-普希金的个性和创造力的方式视为一个单一的连续过程,这一过程克服了任何文学潮流和趋势直至观念主义的态度。普希金文字的力量是如此之大,以至于它比对非现实的态度更强大,对普希金形象的诉求甚至超越了对作者死亡的宣告,这一点在 D. Prigov 的《普希金安娜》中得到了证实。研究结果表明,提及普希金一词的传统具有生命力和连续性,它反映了每个时代的特点和文学进程的发展过程,而且,与概念主义者关于缺乏 "对象 "思想和完全玩弄社会主义现实主义教条碎片的表现性言论相反,普里戈夫的诗歌在早期阶段就已显示出克服概念实践限制的巨大语义潜力。
The specifics of the interpretation of Pushkin’s work in symbolism (V. Bryusov) and conceptualism (D. A. Prigov)
The purpose of the study is to identify the figurative-motional and structural-compositional features of the appeal of the symbolist poet V. Bryusov and the conceptual poet D. Prigov to the personality and work of A. S. Pushkin, to the Pushkin myth as a sign of the continuation of the literary tradition. The article examines not only the formal features of the Bryusov and Prigov Pushkin’s works, but also their content and semantic layers, revealing visible differences in the reception of the image of the genius of Russian literature, dictated by differences not only epoch-making, but also theoretical and literary. The scientific novelty of the work consists in the fact that for the first time the author proposes to consider the ways of addressing the personality and creativity of A. Pushkin as a single continuous process that overcomes the attitudes of anyliterary trends and trends up to conceptualism. The power of Pushkin’s word is so great that it turns out to be stronger than the attitude towards non-ideality, and the appeal to the image of Pushkin overcomes even the proclamation of the author's death, which is confirmed by D. Prigov’s Pushkiniana. As a result of the study, it was found that the tradition of referring to the Pushkin word is alive and continuous, that it reflects the peculiarities of each epoch and the course of development of the literary process, and also that, contrary to the manifestational statements of conceptualists about the lack of ideas of “objects” and total play with the fragments of socialist realist canons, Prigov’s poetry already at an early stage demonstrated a capacious semantic potential that overcomes the limits conceptual practices.