共收缩阻力训练后肌肉活动增加,但与老年人的体力感觉评分无关

M. M. Villalba, R. A. Fujita, B. Bedo, Júlia O. Faria, Renato Moraes, Matheus M. Gomes
{"title":"共收缩阻力训练后肌肉活动增加,但与老年人的体力感觉评分无关","authors":"M. M. Villalba, R. A. Fujita, B. Bedo, Júlia O. Faria, Renato Moraes, Matheus M. Gomes","doi":"10.20338/bjmb.v18i1.405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Evaluating exercise intensity is crucial for designing effective training programs and monitoring progress. The Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale, a subjective measure of effort, is commonly used for estimating exercise intensity. However, its applicability in specific conditions and populations, particularly in co-contraction training and older individuals, warrants further investigation.\nAIM: Our main aim was to analyze the correlation between RPE and electromyographic (EMG) activity in co-contraction and conventional resistance training. We also compared muscle activity and RPE across training methods.\nMETHOD: Twenty-three older adults were allocated and divided into conventional resistance training (CRT) and co-contraction training (CCT). EMG activity and RPE were recorded for knee extension and flexion movement and knee co-contraction during training sets and correlated before and after eight weeks of training.\nRESULTS: The results indicated no significant correlation between EMG activity and RPE for either training method. Additionally, EMG analysis showed higher EMG activity in the CRT than in the CCT. On the other hand, CCT demonstrated an increase in EMG activity after eight weeks of training.\nCONCLUSION: In conclusion, RPE did not correlate with EMG activity, highlighting the need for finding accessible tools to assess exercise intensity, particularly in older people, and alternative training methods, such as co-contraction training.","PeriodicalId":91007,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian journal of motor behavior","volume":"43 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Muscle activity increased after co-contraction resistance training, but it was unrelated to the rating of perceived exertion in older adults\",\"authors\":\"M. M. Villalba, R. A. Fujita, B. Bedo, Júlia O. Faria, Renato Moraes, Matheus M. Gomes\",\"doi\":\"10.20338/bjmb.v18i1.405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Evaluating exercise intensity is crucial for designing effective training programs and monitoring progress. The Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale, a subjective measure of effort, is commonly used for estimating exercise intensity. However, its applicability in specific conditions and populations, particularly in co-contraction training and older individuals, warrants further investigation.\\nAIM: Our main aim was to analyze the correlation between RPE and electromyographic (EMG) activity in co-contraction and conventional resistance training. We also compared muscle activity and RPE across training methods.\\nMETHOD: Twenty-three older adults were allocated and divided into conventional resistance training (CRT) and co-contraction training (CCT). EMG activity and RPE were recorded for knee extension and flexion movement and knee co-contraction during training sets and correlated before and after eight weeks of training.\\nRESULTS: The results indicated no significant correlation between EMG activity and RPE for either training method. Additionally, EMG analysis showed higher EMG activity in the CRT than in the CCT. On the other hand, CCT demonstrated an increase in EMG activity after eight weeks of training.\\nCONCLUSION: In conclusion, RPE did not correlate with EMG activity, highlighting the need for finding accessible tools to assess exercise intensity, particularly in older people, and alternative training methods, such as co-contraction training.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian journal of motor behavior\",\"volume\":\"43 14\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian journal of motor behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20338/bjmb.v18i1.405\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian journal of motor behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20338/bjmb.v18i1.405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:评估运动强度对于设计有效的训练计划和监测进展至关重要。感知运动强度评分(RPE)量表是对运动强度的主观测量,通常用于估计运动强度。目的:我们的主要目的是分析在共同牵引和传统阻力训练中 RPE 与肌电图(EMG)活动之间的相关性。方法:23 名老年人被分配并分为常规阻力训练(CRT)和共同牵引训练(CCT)。结果:结果表明,两种训练方法的 EMG 活动和 RPE 之间均无显著相关性。此外,肌电图分析表明,CRT 的肌电图活动高于 CCT。结论:总之,RPE 与 EMG 活动没有相关性,这突出表明需要找到评估运动强度(尤其是老年人的运动强度)的简便工具,以及其他训练方法,如联合收缩训练。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Muscle activity increased after co-contraction resistance training, but it was unrelated to the rating of perceived exertion in older adults
BACKGROUND: Evaluating exercise intensity is crucial for designing effective training programs and monitoring progress. The Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale, a subjective measure of effort, is commonly used for estimating exercise intensity. However, its applicability in specific conditions and populations, particularly in co-contraction training and older individuals, warrants further investigation. AIM: Our main aim was to analyze the correlation between RPE and electromyographic (EMG) activity in co-contraction and conventional resistance training. We also compared muscle activity and RPE across training methods. METHOD: Twenty-three older adults were allocated and divided into conventional resistance training (CRT) and co-contraction training (CCT). EMG activity and RPE were recorded for knee extension and flexion movement and knee co-contraction during training sets and correlated before and after eight weeks of training. RESULTS: The results indicated no significant correlation between EMG activity and RPE for either training method. Additionally, EMG analysis showed higher EMG activity in the CRT than in the CCT. On the other hand, CCT demonstrated an increase in EMG activity after eight weeks of training. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, RPE did not correlate with EMG activity, highlighting the need for finding accessible tools to assess exercise intensity, particularly in older people, and alternative training methods, such as co-contraction training.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Muscle activity increased after co-contraction resistance training, but it was unrelated to the rating of perceived exertion in older adults There is no difference between two and five minutes of static stretching training and detraining on gastrocnemius medialis muscle thickness, pennation angle and fascicle length INFOGRAPHIC: Changes in locomotor performance and postural control in people with hemophilia The complexity of the handgrip task modulates postural performance in older adults How the multiplanar trunk resistance affects the dynamic postural control during single-leg vertical jumps in college athletes with poor movement quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1