孕前保健对人们意味着什么?关于意识和语言使用的公众咨询

D. Schoenaker, O. Gafari, E. Taylor, J. Hall, C. Barker, B. Jones, N. A. Alwan, D. Watson, C. Jacob, M. Barker, K. M. Godfrey, E. Reason, F. Forder, J. Stephenson
{"title":"孕前保健对人们意味着什么?关于意识和语言使用的公众咨询","authors":"D. Schoenaker, O. Gafari, E. Taylor, J. Hall, C. Barker, B. Jones, N. A. Alwan, D. Watson, C. Jacob, M. Barker, K. M. Godfrey, E. Reason, F. Forder, J. Stephenson","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.19.24310268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: There is growing scientific and policy recognition that optimising health before a potential pregnancy (preconception health) improves reproductive outcomes and the lifelong health of future children. However, public awareness on this topic is low. We conducted a public consultation to develop language recommendations and identify and prioritise approaches to inform research and improve public awareness of preconception health. Methods: A public consultation was undertaken with people of any gender aged 18-50 years living in the UK who were not currently expecting a child. Public contributors were recruited through patient and public involvement, community and support groups, an existing cohort study, and an LGBTQ+ charity. An initial round of online group discussions (February/March 2021) explored public contributors knowledge of preconception health, their recommendations for appropriate language, and ideas about public health approaches. In a subsequent discussion round (May 2021), language recommendations were refined, and suggested approaches prioritised. Discussions were summarised based on notes taken by two researchers. Results: 54 people joined the initial discussion round (66% women, 21% men, 13% non-binary or transgender; 55% aged 18-30 years, 30% 31-40 years, 15% 41-50 years). Of these, 36 people (67%) participated in the subsequent round. Very few had heard the term preconception health, understood what it means, or why and for whom it is important. They recommended avoiding unfamiliar terms without further explanation (e.g. preconception health, medical terms), using language that is positive, encouraging and gender-sensitive where possible, and using messages that are specific, non-judgmental and realistic. The phrases health and wellbeing during the childbearing years, health and wellbeing before pregnancy and parenthood and planning for parenthood resonated with most public contributors. School-based education, social media campaigns and the National Health Service emerged as priority approaches/settings for raising awareness. Conclusion: This public consultation produced recommendations from a diverse group of people of reproductive age in the UK to improve language and prioritise approaches that increase public understanding of preconception health in ways that are relevant and appropriate to them. This should begin in schools and will require adaptation of curricula, alongside co-development of public awareness campaigns and guidance for healthcare professionals.","PeriodicalId":506788,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What does preconception health mean to people? A public consultation on awareness and use of language\",\"authors\":\"D. Schoenaker, O. Gafari, E. Taylor, J. Hall, C. Barker, B. Jones, N. A. Alwan, D. Watson, C. Jacob, M. Barker, K. M. Godfrey, E. Reason, F. Forder, J. Stephenson\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.07.19.24310268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: There is growing scientific and policy recognition that optimising health before a potential pregnancy (preconception health) improves reproductive outcomes and the lifelong health of future children. However, public awareness on this topic is low. We conducted a public consultation to develop language recommendations and identify and prioritise approaches to inform research and improve public awareness of preconception health. Methods: A public consultation was undertaken with people of any gender aged 18-50 years living in the UK who were not currently expecting a child. Public contributors were recruited through patient and public involvement, community and support groups, an existing cohort study, and an LGBTQ+ charity. An initial round of online group discussions (February/March 2021) explored public contributors knowledge of preconception health, their recommendations for appropriate language, and ideas about public health approaches. In a subsequent discussion round (May 2021), language recommendations were refined, and suggested approaches prioritised. Discussions were summarised based on notes taken by two researchers. Results: 54 people joined the initial discussion round (66% women, 21% men, 13% non-binary or transgender; 55% aged 18-30 years, 30% 31-40 years, 15% 41-50 years). Of these, 36 people (67%) participated in the subsequent round. Very few had heard the term preconception health, understood what it means, or why and for whom it is important. They recommended avoiding unfamiliar terms without further explanation (e.g. preconception health, medical terms), using language that is positive, encouraging and gender-sensitive where possible, and using messages that are specific, non-judgmental and realistic. The phrases health and wellbeing during the childbearing years, health and wellbeing before pregnancy and parenthood and planning for parenthood resonated with most public contributors. School-based education, social media campaigns and the National Health Service emerged as priority approaches/settings for raising awareness. Conclusion: This public consultation produced recommendations from a diverse group of people of reproductive age in the UK to improve language and prioritise approaches that increase public understanding of preconception health in ways that are relevant and appropriate to them. This should begin in schools and will require adaptation of curricula, alongside co-development of public awareness campaigns and guidance for healthcare professionals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.19.24310268\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.19.24310268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:越来越多的科学界和政策制定者认识到,优化潜在怀孕前的健康状况(孕前健康)可改善生殖结果和未来孩子的终生健康。然而,公众对这一话题的认知度却很低。我们进行了一次公众咨询,以制定语言建议,确定并优先考虑为研究提供信息和提高公众对孕前健康认识的方法。方法:我们对居住在英国、年龄在 18-50 岁之间、目前尚未怀孕的任何性别的人群进行了公众咨询。我们通过患者和公众参与、社区和支持团体、现有的一项队列研究以及一个 LGBTQ+ 慈善机构招募公众参与者。第一轮在线小组讨论(2021 年 2 月/3 月)探讨了公众贡献者对孕前健康的认识、他们对适当语言的建议以及对公共卫生方法的看法。在随后的一轮讨论(2021 年 5 月)中,对语言建议进行了改进,并对建议的方法进行了优先排序。根据两名研究人员的笔记对讨论进行了总结。讨论结果54 人参加了首轮讨论(66% 为女性,21% 为男性,13% 为非二元或变性人;55% 年龄在 18-30 岁之间,30% 年龄在 31-40 岁之间,15% 年龄在 41-50 岁之间)。其中 36 人(67%)参加了后续讨论。很少有人听说过 "孕前保健 "这个词,也不了解它的含义,更不知道它为什么重要以及对谁重要。他们建议在没有进一步解释的情况下避免使用不熟悉的术语(如孕前健康、医学术语),尽可能使用积极、鼓励性和对性别问题有敏感认识的语言,并使用具体、非评判性和现实的信息。育龄期的健康与幸福、孕前和为人父母前的健康与幸福以及为人父母的计划等短语引起了大多数公众的共鸣。学校教育、社交媒体宣传和国民健康服务成为提高认识的优先方法/环境。结论此次公众咨询会上,英国不同育龄人群提出了建议,以改进语言并优先采用与他们相关且适合他们的方式来提高公众对孕前健康的认识。这项工作应从学校开始,需要对课程进行调整,同时共同开展提高公众认识的活动,并为医疗保健专业人员提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What does preconception health mean to people? A public consultation on awareness and use of language
Introduction: There is growing scientific and policy recognition that optimising health before a potential pregnancy (preconception health) improves reproductive outcomes and the lifelong health of future children. However, public awareness on this topic is low. We conducted a public consultation to develop language recommendations and identify and prioritise approaches to inform research and improve public awareness of preconception health. Methods: A public consultation was undertaken with people of any gender aged 18-50 years living in the UK who were not currently expecting a child. Public contributors were recruited through patient and public involvement, community and support groups, an existing cohort study, and an LGBTQ+ charity. An initial round of online group discussions (February/March 2021) explored public contributors knowledge of preconception health, their recommendations for appropriate language, and ideas about public health approaches. In a subsequent discussion round (May 2021), language recommendations were refined, and suggested approaches prioritised. Discussions were summarised based on notes taken by two researchers. Results: 54 people joined the initial discussion round (66% women, 21% men, 13% non-binary or transgender; 55% aged 18-30 years, 30% 31-40 years, 15% 41-50 years). Of these, 36 people (67%) participated in the subsequent round. Very few had heard the term preconception health, understood what it means, or why and for whom it is important. They recommended avoiding unfamiliar terms without further explanation (e.g. preconception health, medical terms), using language that is positive, encouraging and gender-sensitive where possible, and using messages that are specific, non-judgmental and realistic. The phrases health and wellbeing during the childbearing years, health and wellbeing before pregnancy and parenthood and planning for parenthood resonated with most public contributors. School-based education, social media campaigns and the National Health Service emerged as priority approaches/settings for raising awareness. Conclusion: This public consultation produced recommendations from a diverse group of people of reproductive age in the UK to improve language and prioritise approaches that increase public understanding of preconception health in ways that are relevant and appropriate to them. This should begin in schools and will require adaptation of curricula, alongside co-development of public awareness campaigns and guidance for healthcare professionals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reemergence of Oropouche virus between 2023 and 2024 in Brazil Towards Personalized Breast Cancer Risk Management: A Thai Cohort Study on Polygenic Risk Scores Hot Spring Residency and Disease Association: a Crossover Gene-Environment Interaction (GxE) Study in Taiwan Evaluation of the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS and YiDiXie™-D in renal cancer Dual exposure-by-polygenic score interactions highlight disparities across social groups in the proportion needed to benefit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1