管理能力与会计可比性:来自中国上市公司的证据

IF 1.5 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Economics & Politics Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1111/ecpo.12308
Lu Zhang, Boyang Hao, Dan Yang, Guojun Wang
{"title":"管理能力与会计可比性:来自中国上市公司的证据","authors":"Lu Zhang,&nbsp;Boyang Hao,&nbsp;Dan Yang,&nbsp;Guojun Wang","doi":"10.1111/ecpo.12308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We explore the impact of management team ability on firm-level accounting comparability. Through using a sample of Chinese listed firms from 2009 to 2022, the paper documents that accounting comparability has an inverse U-shaped association with management team ability where a certain level of managerial ability leads to the highest levels of accounting comparability. Further analysis shows that high-ability managers have different incentives on accounting comparability when compared to low-ability managers, especially when they suffer financing constraints, possess more proprietary information, experience weak market environment, bear excessive price risk and risk premium and work in the politically connected firms.</p>","PeriodicalId":47220,"journal":{"name":"Economics & Politics","volume":"36 3","pages":"1731-1762"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managerial ability and accounting comparability: Evidence from Chinese listed firms\",\"authors\":\"Lu Zhang,&nbsp;Boyang Hao,&nbsp;Dan Yang,&nbsp;Guojun Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ecpo.12308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We explore the impact of management team ability on firm-level accounting comparability. Through using a sample of Chinese listed firms from 2009 to 2022, the paper documents that accounting comparability has an inverse U-shaped association with management team ability where a certain level of managerial ability leads to the highest levels of accounting comparability. Further analysis shows that high-ability managers have different incentives on accounting comparability when compared to low-ability managers, especially when they suffer financing constraints, possess more proprietary information, experience weak market environment, bear excessive price risk and risk premium and work in the politically connected firms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics & Politics\",\"volume\":\"36 3\",\"pages\":\"1731-1762\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics & Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecpo.12308\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics & Politics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecpo.12308","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们探讨了管理团队能力对公司层面会计可比性的影响。通过使用 2009 年至 2022 年的中国上市公司样本,本文发现会计可比性与管理团队能力呈反 U 型关系,即一定水平的管理能力会导致最高水平的会计可比性。进一步的分析表明,与低能力经理人相比,高能力经理人在会计可比性方面具有不同的动机,尤其是当他们受到融资限制、拥有更多专有信息、经历薄弱的市场环境、承担过高的价格风险和风险溢价以及在政治关联企业工作时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Managerial ability and accounting comparability: Evidence from Chinese listed firms

We explore the impact of management team ability on firm-level accounting comparability. Through using a sample of Chinese listed firms from 2009 to 2022, the paper documents that accounting comparability has an inverse U-shaped association with management team ability where a certain level of managerial ability leads to the highest levels of accounting comparability. Further analysis shows that high-ability managers have different incentives on accounting comparability when compared to low-ability managers, especially when they suffer financing constraints, possess more proprietary information, experience weak market environment, bear excessive price risk and risk premium and work in the politically connected firms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Economics & Politics focuses on analytical political economy, broadly defined as the study of economic and political phenomena and policy in models that include political processes, institutions and markets. The journal is the source for innovative theoretical and empirical work on the intersection of politics and economics, at both domestic and international levels, and aims to promote new approaches on how these forces interact to affect political outcomes and policy choices, economic performance and societal welfare. Economics & Politics is a vital source of information for economists, academics and students, providing: - Analytical political economics - International scholarship - Accessible & thought-provoking articles - Creative inter-disciplinary analysis
期刊最新文献
Issue Information What causes polarized stagnation, corporate economy, or welfare state?: Insights from new development economics The effects of non‐trade non‐rent barriers on intra‐Africa trade Patriarchy, pandemics, and the gendered resource curse thesis: Evidence from petroleum geology How does oil policy uncertainty influence resource rents? New empirical evidence from Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1