在 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间获得和使用避孕药具:在南非和赞比亚进行的混合方法研究

Rebecca L. Callahan, Alice F. Cartwright, M. Beksinska, Margaret Kasaro, Jennifer H. Tang, Cecilia Milford, Christina Wong, Marissa Velarde, Virginia Maphumulo, Mariam H Fawzy, Manze Chinyama, Esther Chabu, Mayaba Mudenda, Jennifer A Smit
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间获得和使用避孕药具:在南非和赞比亚进行的混合方法研究","authors":"Rebecca L. Callahan, Alice F. Cartwright, M. Beksinska, Margaret Kasaro, Jennifer H. Tang, Cecilia Milford, Christina Wong, Marissa Velarde, Virginia Maphumulo, Mariam H Fawzy, Manze Chinyama, Esther Chabu, Mayaba Mudenda, Jennifer A Smit","doi":"10.12688/gatesopenres.14590.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The COVID-19 pandemic affected global access to health services, including contraception We sought to explore effects of the pandemic on family planning (FP) service provision and use in South Africa and Zambia, including on implant and intrauterine device (IUD) users’ desire and ability to obtain removal. Methods Between August 2020 and April 2021, we conducted surveys with 537 women participating in an ongoing longitudinal contraceptive continuation study. We also carried out in-depth interviews with 39 of the survey participants and 36 key informants involved in FP provision. We conducted descriptive analysis of survey responses and thematic analysis of interviews. Results Contraceptive use changed minimally in this sample with the emergence of COVID-19. Fewer than half of women (n=220) reported that they tried to access FP since the start of the pandemic. The vast majority of those seeking services were using short-acting methods and 95% were able to obtain their preferred method. The proportion of women not using a method before and after the start of the pandemic did not change in Zambia (31%), and increased from 8% to 10% in South Africa. Less than 7% of implant or IUD users in either country reported wanting removal. Among the 22 who sought removal, 10 in Zambia and 6 in South Africa successfully obtained removal. In qualitative interviews, those reporting challenges to service access specifically mentioned long queues, deprioritization of contraceptive services, lack of transportation, stock-outs, and fear of contracting COVID-19 at a facility. Key informants reported stock-outs, especially of injectables, and staff shortages as barriers. Conclusions We did not find a substantial impact of COVID-19 on contraceptive access and use among this sample; however, providers and others involved in service provision identified risks to continuity of care. As the COVID-19 pandemic wanes, it continues to be important to monitor people’s ability to access their preferred contraceptive methods.","PeriodicalId":504483,"journal":{"name":"Gates Open Research","volume":" 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contraceptive access and use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study in South Africa and Zambia\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca L. Callahan, Alice F. Cartwright, M. Beksinska, Margaret Kasaro, Jennifer H. Tang, Cecilia Milford, Christina Wong, Marissa Velarde, Virginia Maphumulo, Mariam H Fawzy, Manze Chinyama, Esther Chabu, Mayaba Mudenda, Jennifer A Smit\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/gatesopenres.14590.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background The COVID-19 pandemic affected global access to health services, including contraception We sought to explore effects of the pandemic on family planning (FP) service provision and use in South Africa and Zambia, including on implant and intrauterine device (IUD) users’ desire and ability to obtain removal. Methods Between August 2020 and April 2021, we conducted surveys with 537 women participating in an ongoing longitudinal contraceptive continuation study. We also carried out in-depth interviews with 39 of the survey participants and 36 key informants involved in FP provision. We conducted descriptive analysis of survey responses and thematic analysis of interviews. Results Contraceptive use changed minimally in this sample with the emergence of COVID-19. Fewer than half of women (n=220) reported that they tried to access FP since the start of the pandemic. The vast majority of those seeking services were using short-acting methods and 95% were able to obtain their preferred method. The proportion of women not using a method before and after the start of the pandemic did not change in Zambia (31%), and increased from 8% to 10% in South Africa. Less than 7% of implant or IUD users in either country reported wanting removal. Among the 22 who sought removal, 10 in Zambia and 6 in South Africa successfully obtained removal. In qualitative interviews, those reporting challenges to service access specifically mentioned long queues, deprioritization of contraceptive services, lack of transportation, stock-outs, and fear of contracting COVID-19 at a facility. Key informants reported stock-outs, especially of injectables, and staff shortages as barriers. Conclusions We did not find a substantial impact of COVID-19 on contraceptive access and use among this sample; however, providers and others involved in service provision identified risks to continuity of care. As the COVID-19 pandemic wanes, it continues to be important to monitor people’s ability to access their preferred contraceptive methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gates Open Research\",\"volume\":\" 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gates Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.14590.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gates Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.14590.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 COVID-19 大流行影响了全球卫生服务的获取,包括避孕药具的获取。我们试图探究大流行对南非和赞比亚计划生育(FP)服务的提供和使用的影响,包括对植入物和宫内节育器(IUD)使用者取出避孕药具的愿望和能力的影响。方法 在 2020 年 8 月至 2021 年 4 月期间,我们对参加一项正在进行的纵向避孕延续研究的 537 名妇女进行了调查。我们还对 39 名调查参与者和 36 名参与提供 FP 的关键信息提供者进行了深入访谈。我们对调查回答进行了描述性分析,对访谈进行了主题分析。结果 COVID-19 的出现使样本中避孕药具的使用发生了很小的变化。只有不到一半的妇女(n=220)报告说,自大流行开始以来,她们尝试过使用计划生育服务。绝大多数寻求服务的妇女使用的是短效避孕方法,95%的妇女能够获得自己喜欢的方法。在赞比亚,大流行开始前后未使用避孕方法的妇女比例没有变化(31%),而在南非,这一比例从 8%上升到 10%。在这两个国家中,只有不到 7% 的植入物或宫内节育器使用者表示希望取出。在 22 名寻求取出宫内节育器的人中,赞比亚有 10 人、南非有 6 人成功取出了宫内节育器。在定性访谈中,那些报告在获得服务方面遇到困难的人特别提到了排长队、避孕服务不优先、交通不便、缺货以及担心在医疗机构感染 COVID-19。主要信息提供者称,库存短缺(尤其是注射剂)和人员短缺也是障碍之一。结论 我们在样本中没有发现 COVID-19 对避孕药具的获取和使用产生实质性影响;但是,服务提供者和其他参与服务提供的人员发现了护理连续性面临的风险。随着 COVID-19 大流行的减弱,监测人们获得其首选避孕方法的能力仍然非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contraceptive access and use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study in South Africa and Zambia
Background The COVID-19 pandemic affected global access to health services, including contraception We sought to explore effects of the pandemic on family planning (FP) service provision and use in South Africa and Zambia, including on implant and intrauterine device (IUD) users’ desire and ability to obtain removal. Methods Between August 2020 and April 2021, we conducted surveys with 537 women participating in an ongoing longitudinal contraceptive continuation study. We also carried out in-depth interviews with 39 of the survey participants and 36 key informants involved in FP provision. We conducted descriptive analysis of survey responses and thematic analysis of interviews. Results Contraceptive use changed minimally in this sample with the emergence of COVID-19. Fewer than half of women (n=220) reported that they tried to access FP since the start of the pandemic. The vast majority of those seeking services were using short-acting methods and 95% were able to obtain their preferred method. The proportion of women not using a method before and after the start of the pandemic did not change in Zambia (31%), and increased from 8% to 10% in South Africa. Less than 7% of implant or IUD users in either country reported wanting removal. Among the 22 who sought removal, 10 in Zambia and 6 in South Africa successfully obtained removal. In qualitative interviews, those reporting challenges to service access specifically mentioned long queues, deprioritization of contraceptive services, lack of transportation, stock-outs, and fear of contracting COVID-19 at a facility. Key informants reported stock-outs, especially of injectables, and staff shortages as barriers. Conclusions We did not find a substantial impact of COVID-19 on contraceptive access and use among this sample; however, providers and others involved in service provision identified risks to continuity of care. As the COVID-19 pandemic wanes, it continues to be important to monitor people’s ability to access their preferred contraceptive methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"Life mapping" exploring the lived experience of COVID-19 on access to HIV treatment and care in Malawi Contraceptive access and use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study in South Africa and Zambia Unpacking WHO and CDC Bottle Bioassay Methods: A Comprehensive Literature Review and Protocol Analysis Revealing Key Outcome Predictors Strengthening district health management and planning: an evaluation of a multi-country initiative in Eastern and Southern Africa Identification of latent contraceptive ideational profiles among urban women in Senegal: Transitions and implications for family planning programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1