球队的进攻风格是足球裁判高强度行动的决定因素

Retos Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.47197/retos.v58.106789
Paulo Sandi, A. Teixeira, Gabriel S G Maia, Pedro V S Passos, Paulo V Souza, Carlo Castagna, Paulo H Borges, Juliano F Silva
{"title":"球队的进攻风格是足球裁判高强度行动的决定因素","authors":"Paulo Sandi, A. Teixeira, Gabriel S G Maia, Pedro V S Passos, Paulo V Souza, Carlo Castagna, Paulo H Borges, Juliano F Silva","doi":"10.47197/retos.v58.106789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to examine the impact of the attacking style of teams and match outcome on the high-intensity activities (HIA) performed by Brazilian field referees (FRs) and assistant referees (ARs). The sample was composed of 20 FRs (age: 34.4 ± 5.9 years) and 36 ARs (age: 35.4 ± 6.3 years). Match activities derived from Global Position System (GPS) were collected from FRs and ARs during 41 official soccer matches over two seasons. A total of 3898 (FRs: 2118; ARs: 1780) actions were analyzed by video-motion to determine attacking style: counterattack (CA), fast attack (FA) and positional attack (PA). Match outcome was assessed as final match outcome (home win, draw and away win) and goal difference (GD) (0, 1 and ≥ 2). Significance level was set ρ < 0,05. Higher proportion of HIA was observed during CA (FRs: 60.7%; ARs: 50.6%) when compared to FA and PA. CA elicited longer HIA in terms of distance and duration than the other attacking styles analyzed. FRs covered significantly (p = 0.01) longer total distance (TD) when the away team won the match than in other conditions. In addition, GD 1 and GD 0 resulted in longer TD (p=0.01) and distance at sprinting (SPR) (p=0.04), respectively. These results provide valuable insights to the influence of different match factors on the performance of referees during soccer matches.\nKeywords: match status, final match outcome, attacking type, situational variable.","PeriodicalId":503742,"journal":{"name":"Retos","volume":" 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The attacking style of teams is determinant of high-intensity actions of soccer referees\",\"authors\":\"Paulo Sandi, A. Teixeira, Gabriel S G Maia, Pedro V S Passos, Paulo V Souza, Carlo Castagna, Paulo H Borges, Juliano F Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.47197/retos.v58.106789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to examine the impact of the attacking style of teams and match outcome on the high-intensity activities (HIA) performed by Brazilian field referees (FRs) and assistant referees (ARs). The sample was composed of 20 FRs (age: 34.4 ± 5.9 years) and 36 ARs (age: 35.4 ± 6.3 years). Match activities derived from Global Position System (GPS) were collected from FRs and ARs during 41 official soccer matches over two seasons. A total of 3898 (FRs: 2118; ARs: 1780) actions were analyzed by video-motion to determine attacking style: counterattack (CA), fast attack (FA) and positional attack (PA). Match outcome was assessed as final match outcome (home win, draw and away win) and goal difference (GD) (0, 1 and ≥ 2). Significance level was set ρ < 0,05. Higher proportion of HIA was observed during CA (FRs: 60.7%; ARs: 50.6%) when compared to FA and PA. CA elicited longer HIA in terms of distance and duration than the other attacking styles analyzed. FRs covered significantly (p = 0.01) longer total distance (TD) when the away team won the match than in other conditions. In addition, GD 1 and GD 0 resulted in longer TD (p=0.01) and distance at sprinting (SPR) (p=0.04), respectively. These results provide valuable insights to the influence of different match factors on the performance of referees during soccer matches.\\nKeywords: match status, final match outcome, attacking type, situational variable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Retos\",\"volume\":\" 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Retos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v58.106789\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v58.106789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨球队的进攻风格和比赛结果对巴西现场裁判(FRs)和助理裁判(ARs)高强度活动(HIA)的影响。样本由 20 名现场裁判(年龄:34.4 ± 5.9 岁)和 36 名助理裁判(年龄:35.4 ± 6.3 岁)组成。在两个赛季的 41 场正式足球比赛中,从全球定位系统(GPS)中收集了 FR 和 AR 的比赛活动。通过视频运动分析了总计 3898 个(前锋:2118 个;后卫:1780 个)动作,以确定进攻方式:反击(CA)、快攻(FA)和定位球(PA)。比赛结果以最终比赛结果(主场获胜、平局和客场获胜)和净胜球(GD)(0、1 和 ≥ 2)进行评估。显著性水平设定为 ρ < 0,05。与 FA 和 PA 相比,CA 期间观察到的 HIA 比例更高(FRs:60.7%;ARs:50.6%)。就距离和持续时间而言,CA 比其他攻击方式引起的 HIA 更长。当客队获胜时,FRs 的总距离(TD)明显长于其他情况(p = 0.01)。此外,GD 1 和 GD 0 分别导致更长的 TD(p=0.01)和冲刺距离(SPR)(p=0.04)。这些结果为足球比赛中不同比赛因素对裁判表现的影响提供了有价值的见解。关键词:比赛状态;最终比赛结果;进攻类型;情景变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The attacking style of teams is determinant of high-intensity actions of soccer referees
This study aimed to examine the impact of the attacking style of teams and match outcome on the high-intensity activities (HIA) performed by Brazilian field referees (FRs) and assistant referees (ARs). The sample was composed of 20 FRs (age: 34.4 ± 5.9 years) and 36 ARs (age: 35.4 ± 6.3 years). Match activities derived from Global Position System (GPS) were collected from FRs and ARs during 41 official soccer matches over two seasons. A total of 3898 (FRs: 2118; ARs: 1780) actions were analyzed by video-motion to determine attacking style: counterattack (CA), fast attack (FA) and positional attack (PA). Match outcome was assessed as final match outcome (home win, draw and away win) and goal difference (GD) (0, 1 and ≥ 2). Significance level was set ρ < 0,05. Higher proportion of HIA was observed during CA (FRs: 60.7%; ARs: 50.6%) when compared to FA and PA. CA elicited longer HIA in terms of distance and duration than the other attacking styles analyzed. FRs covered significantly (p = 0.01) longer total distance (TD) when the away team won the match than in other conditions. In addition, GD 1 and GD 0 resulted in longer TD (p=0.01) and distance at sprinting (SPR) (p=0.04), respectively. These results provide valuable insights to the influence of different match factors on the performance of referees during soccer matches. Keywords: match status, final match outcome, attacking type, situational variable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Percepción de la relación deporte-política desde las funciones de la economía política (Perception of the sport-politics relationship from the functions of political economy) La evaluación en educación física: representaciones sociales de profesores de establecimientos educacionales de Viña del Mar, Chile (Evaluation in physical education: social representations of teachers from educational establishments in Viña del Mar, Chile) Composición corporal y autoestima corporal en usuarios de gimnasios en una población colombiana (Body composition and body self-esteem in gym users in a Colombian city) Self efficacy analysis of Yogyakarta middle school extracurricular martial arts trainers: gender and coaching license level Characteristics of gross motor skills of elementary school students aged 7 and 8 years: a cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1