林牧系统中信号草 "Basilisk "落叶前的冠层高度

Victor Augustus Vasconcelos de Oliveira, R. B. D. Silva, A. Veloso, Matheus Almeida Alves, M. M. D. Santos, R. A. C. Passetti, Lívia Vieira de Barros, M. Mourthé, Manoel Eduardo Rozalino Santos, T.G.S. Braz
{"title":"林牧系统中信号草 \"Basilisk \"落叶前的冠层高度","authors":"Victor Augustus Vasconcelos de Oliveira, R. B. D. Silva, A. Veloso, Matheus Almeida Alves, M. M. D. Santos, R. A. C. Passetti, Lívia Vieira de Barros, M. Mourthé, Manoel Eduardo Rozalino Santos, T.G.S. Braz","doi":"10.5433/1679-0359.2024v45n4p1081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to compare the response of Urochloa decumbens cv. Basilisk pastures in monoculture and silvopastoral systems (SPS), and to determine the most suitable pre-defoliation canopy height for managing this species in SPS. Four pre-defoliation canopy heights (20, 30, 40, and 50 cm) were tested for signal grass in SPS, alongside a control treatment involving defoliation at 20 cm in full sun. The experiment was conducted using a randomized block design with four replicates. The forage accumulation rate was higher in monoculture (36.5 kg ha-1 day-1 of DM) compared to the silvopastoral system (22.0 kg ha-1 day-1 of DM), and there was no significant effect of pre-defoliation canopy height within the SPS. The density of tillers in monoculture was comparable to that observed in canopies managed at a height of 50 cm within the SPS. Leaf mass and leaf percentage were maximized at heights of 40 cm and 50 cm, respectively. Neither the cultivation system nor the pre-defoliation canopy heights in the SPS influenced the fiber and protein content. Leaf accumulation and mass were higher in monoculture, but the cultivation system did not affect the chemical composition of the forage. Heights between 40 cm and 50 cm in the SPS should be used to maximize tillering, mass, and leaf percentage of signal grass ‘Basilisk’. The chemical composition of the produced forage did not undergo significant changes, neither between systems nor across pre-defoliation heights.","PeriodicalId":21921,"journal":{"name":"Semina: Ciências Agrárias","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-defoliation canopy height for signal grass ‘Basilisk’ in silvopastoral systems\",\"authors\":\"Victor Augustus Vasconcelos de Oliveira, R. B. D. Silva, A. Veloso, Matheus Almeida Alves, M. M. D. Santos, R. A. C. Passetti, Lívia Vieira de Barros, M. Mourthé, Manoel Eduardo Rozalino Santos, T.G.S. Braz\",\"doi\":\"10.5433/1679-0359.2024v45n4p1081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this study was to compare the response of Urochloa decumbens cv. Basilisk pastures in monoculture and silvopastoral systems (SPS), and to determine the most suitable pre-defoliation canopy height for managing this species in SPS. Four pre-defoliation canopy heights (20, 30, 40, and 50 cm) were tested for signal grass in SPS, alongside a control treatment involving defoliation at 20 cm in full sun. The experiment was conducted using a randomized block design with four replicates. The forage accumulation rate was higher in monoculture (36.5 kg ha-1 day-1 of DM) compared to the silvopastoral system (22.0 kg ha-1 day-1 of DM), and there was no significant effect of pre-defoliation canopy height within the SPS. The density of tillers in monoculture was comparable to that observed in canopies managed at a height of 50 cm within the SPS. Leaf mass and leaf percentage were maximized at heights of 40 cm and 50 cm, respectively. Neither the cultivation system nor the pre-defoliation canopy heights in the SPS influenced the fiber and protein content. Leaf accumulation and mass were higher in monoculture, but the cultivation system did not affect the chemical composition of the forage. Heights between 40 cm and 50 cm in the SPS should be used to maximize tillering, mass, and leaf percentage of signal grass ‘Basilisk’. The chemical composition of the produced forage did not undergo significant changes, neither between systems nor across pre-defoliation heights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Semina: Ciências Agrárias\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Semina: Ciências Agrárias\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2024v45n4p1081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Semina: Ciências Agrárias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2024v45n4p1081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较信号草(Urochloa decumbens cv. Basilisk)在单一种植系统和林牧系统(SPS)中的反应,并确定最适合在林牧系统中管理该物种的落叶前树冠高度。对 SPS 中的信号草进行了四种落叶前冠层高度(20、30、40 和 50 厘米)的测试,同时还进行了在全日照条件下 20 厘米落叶的对照处理。试验采用四次重复的随机区组设计。单一种植的牧草积累率(36.5 千克/公顷-1 日-1 DM)高于造林-放牧系统(22.0 千克/公顷-1 日-1 DM),而在造林-放牧系统中,落叶前的冠层高度没有显著影响。在单一种植中观察到的分蘖密度与在小农生产系统中以 50 厘米高度管理的冠层中观察到的分蘖密度相当。叶片质量和叶片百分比分别在高度为 40 厘米和 50 厘米时达到最大值。SPS中的栽培系统和落叶前树冠高度都不会影响纤维和蛋白质含量。单一栽培时叶片的积累量和质量较高,但栽培方式并不影响牧草的化学成分。应采用 40 厘米至 50 厘米的单株栽培,以最大限度地提高信号草 "Basilisk "的分蘖、质量和叶片百分比。所产牧草的化学成分在不同栽培系统和不同的脱叶前高度之间都没有发生显著变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pre-defoliation canopy height for signal grass ‘Basilisk’ in silvopastoral systems
The objective of this study was to compare the response of Urochloa decumbens cv. Basilisk pastures in monoculture and silvopastoral systems (SPS), and to determine the most suitable pre-defoliation canopy height for managing this species in SPS. Four pre-defoliation canopy heights (20, 30, 40, and 50 cm) were tested for signal grass in SPS, alongside a control treatment involving defoliation at 20 cm in full sun. The experiment was conducted using a randomized block design with four replicates. The forage accumulation rate was higher in monoculture (36.5 kg ha-1 day-1 of DM) compared to the silvopastoral system (22.0 kg ha-1 day-1 of DM), and there was no significant effect of pre-defoliation canopy height within the SPS. The density of tillers in monoculture was comparable to that observed in canopies managed at a height of 50 cm within the SPS. Leaf mass and leaf percentage were maximized at heights of 40 cm and 50 cm, respectively. Neither the cultivation system nor the pre-defoliation canopy heights in the SPS influenced the fiber and protein content. Leaf accumulation and mass were higher in monoculture, but the cultivation system did not affect the chemical composition of the forage. Heights between 40 cm and 50 cm in the SPS should be used to maximize tillering, mass, and leaf percentage of signal grass ‘Basilisk’. The chemical composition of the produced forage did not undergo significant changes, neither between systems nor across pre-defoliation heights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Resposta imune induzida pelo sorotipo Massachusetts e variante BR do vírus da bronquite infecciosa em frangos de corte Pre-defoliation canopy height for signal grass ‘Basilisk’ in silvopastoral systems Desempenho reprodutivo, características da lactação e medidas biométricas de caprinos Manavlı Efeitos do uso prolongado de meloxicam em equinos hígidos: achados clínicos, laboratoriais, gastroscópicos e eletrocardiográficos Efeitos hemodinâmicos e respiratórios em ovinos submetidos a quatro modalidades de ventilação e anestesiados com isoflurano ou propofol
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1