使用 AFT 进行全乳房重建时长期抗生素预防的疗效:一项回顾性队列研究

{"title":"使用 AFT 进行全乳房重建时长期抗生素预防的疗效:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.07.041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Autologous fat transfer (AFT) is increasingly adopted as another total breast reconstruction option. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of prolonged antibiotic treatment on the onset of surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients treated with AFT for total breast reconstruction.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who received AFT for total breast reconstruction, with antibiotic prophylaxis during their (multiple) AFT procedure(s) from 9 December 2020 to 10 October 2023. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to their prophylactic antibiotic regimen. The primary outcome was analyzed, including the cumulative incidence, the relative risk (RR), the absolute risk reduction (ARR), and the number needed to treat (NNT). For the secondary outcome, a multilevel logistic regression analysis was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seven hundred sixty-five surgeries in 205 patients were analyzed. Six hundred twenty-four surgeries on 168 patients had perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in combination with postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis administered (group 1). One hundred forty-one surgeries on 37 patients had only perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis administered (group 2). The RR was 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.14–3.31) of a SSI when receiving peri- and postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in comparison with treatment with only perioperative prophylaxis. The ARR was 0.46% (95% CI; −1.40 to 2.32) with a NNT of 219 patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis is ineffective for patients who receive total breast reconstruction with AFT. This study showed no statistically significant difference in SSIs of the reconstructed breast after receiving prolonged antibiotic treatment in comparison with single-shot perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524004133/pdfft?md5=349cd7c7b0a03b0673b7c172bee21f7a&pid=1-s2.0-S1748681524004133-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis in total breast reconstruction with Autologous Fat Transfer (AFT): A retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.07.041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Autologous fat transfer (AFT) is increasingly adopted as another total breast reconstruction option. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of prolonged antibiotic treatment on the onset of surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients treated with AFT for total breast reconstruction.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who received AFT for total breast reconstruction, with antibiotic prophylaxis during their (multiple) AFT procedure(s) from 9 December 2020 to 10 October 2023. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to their prophylactic antibiotic regimen. The primary outcome was analyzed, including the cumulative incidence, the relative risk (RR), the absolute risk reduction (ARR), and the number needed to treat (NNT). For the secondary outcome, a multilevel logistic regression analysis was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seven hundred sixty-five surgeries in 205 patients were analyzed. Six hundred twenty-four surgeries on 168 patients had perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in combination with postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis administered (group 1). One hundred forty-one surgeries on 37 patients had only perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis administered (group 2). The RR was 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.14–3.31) of a SSI when receiving peri- and postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in comparison with treatment with only perioperative prophylaxis. The ARR was 0.46% (95% CI; −1.40 to 2.32) with a NNT of 219 patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis is ineffective for patients who receive total breast reconstruction with AFT. This study showed no statistically significant difference in SSIs of the reconstructed breast after receiving prolonged antibiotic treatment in comparison with single-shot perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524004133/pdfft?md5=349cd7c7b0a03b0673b7c172bee21f7a&pid=1-s2.0-S1748681524004133-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524004133\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524004133","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景自体脂肪移植(AFT)作为另一种全乳房重建方法正被越来越多地采用。本研究旨在探讨长期抗生素治疗对接受自体脂肪移植治疗的全乳房重建患者手术部位感染(SSIs)发病率的影响。这项回顾性队列研究的对象是在2020年12月9日至2023年10月10日期间接受自体脂肪移植治疗的全乳房重建患者,他们在接受(多次)自体脂肪移植手术期间使用了抗生素预防。根据预防性抗生素方案将患者分为两组。主要结果包括累积发病率、相对风险 (RR)、绝对风险降低 (ARR) 和治疗所需人数 (NNT)。结果对 205 名患者的 765 例手术进行了分析。168名患者的624例手术在围手术期使用了抗生素预防,术后也使用了抗生素预防(第1组)。37 名患者的 141 例手术仅使用了围手术期抗生素预防(第 2 组)。接受围手术期和术后抗生素预防治疗与仅接受围手术期预防治疗相比,发生 SSI 的 RR 为 0.68(95% 置信区间 [CI];0.14-3.31)。ARR为0.46% (95% CI; -1.40 to 2.32),NNT为219例患者。本研究显示,与围手术期单次抗生素预防相比,接受长时间抗生素治疗后重建乳房的 SSIs 没有明显的统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The efficacy of prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis in total breast reconstruction with Autologous Fat Transfer (AFT): A retrospective cohort study

Background

Autologous fat transfer (AFT) is increasingly adopted as another total breast reconstruction option. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of prolonged antibiotic treatment on the onset of surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients treated with AFT for total breast reconstruction.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who received AFT for total breast reconstruction, with antibiotic prophylaxis during their (multiple) AFT procedure(s) from 9 December 2020 to 10 October 2023. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to their prophylactic antibiotic regimen. The primary outcome was analyzed, including the cumulative incidence, the relative risk (RR), the absolute risk reduction (ARR), and the number needed to treat (NNT). For the secondary outcome, a multilevel logistic regression analysis was performed.

Results

Seven hundred sixty-five surgeries in 205 patients were analyzed. Six hundred twenty-four surgeries on 168 patients had perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in combination with postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis administered (group 1). One hundred forty-one surgeries on 37 patients had only perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis administered (group 2). The RR was 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.14–3.31) of a SSI when receiving peri- and postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in comparison with treatment with only perioperative prophylaxis. The ARR was 0.46% (95% CI; −1.40 to 2.32) with a NNT of 219 patients.

Conclusion

Prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis is ineffective for patients who receive total breast reconstruction with AFT. This study showed no statistically significant difference in SSIs of the reconstructed breast after receiving prolonged antibiotic treatment in comparison with single-shot perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
578
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery. The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.
期刊最新文献
Trends in advanced practice providers in plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2013–2021 Editorial Board Long-term results and patient-reported outcomes after vascularized fibular graft use in the treatment of post-traumatic bone defects of femur shaft and tibia: A retrospective cohort and cross-sectional survey study Taps, wicks, bridges and LIFTs: Clarification on the origins of lymphatic flaps The curious case of medical advisor: The house of cards in aesthetic medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1