Blanche Texier , Cédric Hémon , Adélie Queffélec , Jason Dowling , Igor Bessieres , Peter Greer , Oscar Acosta , Adrien Boue-Rafle , Renaud de Crevoisier , Caroline Lafond , Joël Castelli , Anaïs Barateau , Jean-Claude Nunes
{"title":"用于前列腺放射治疗中磁共振成像到计算机断层扫描合成的三维无监督深度学习方法","authors":"Blanche Texier , Cédric Hémon , Adélie Queffélec , Jason Dowling , Igor Bessieres , Peter Greer , Oscar Acosta , Adrien Boue-Rafle , Renaud de Crevoisier , Caroline Lafond , Joël Castelli , Anaïs Barateau , Jean-Claude Nunes","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-to-computed tomography (CT) synthesis is essential in MRI-only radiotherapy workflows, particularly through deep learning techniques known for their accuracy. However, current supervised methods are limited to specific center’s learnings and depend on registration precision. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of unsupervised and supervised approaches in the context of prostate MRI-to-CT generation for radiotherapy dose calculation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>CT/MRI image pairs from 99 prostate cancer patients across three different centers were used. A comparison between supervised and unsupervised conditional Generative Adversarial Networks (cGAN) was conducted. Unsupervised training incorporates a style transfer method with. Content and Style Representation for Enhanced Perceptual synthesis (CREPs) loss. For dose evaluation, the photon prescription dose was 60 Gy delivered in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Imaging endpoint for sCT evaluation was Mean Absolute Error (MAE). Dosimetric endpoints included absolute dose differences and gamma analysis between CT and sCT dose calculations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The unsupervised paired network exhibited the highest accuracy for the body with a MAE at 33.6 HU, the highest MAE was 45.5 HU obtained with unsupervised unpaired learning. All architectures provided clinically acceptable results for dose calculation with gamma pass rates above 94 % (1 % 1 mm 10 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study shows that multicenter data can produce accurate sCTs via unsupervised learning, eliminating CT-MRI registration. The sCTs not only matched HU values but also enabled precise dose calculations, suggesting their potential for wider use in MRI-only radiotherapy workflows.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100612"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000824/pdfft?md5=452e70a66f63e6bbc801a2ec1489bae9&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624000824-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"3D Unsupervised deep learning method for magnetic resonance imaging-to-computed tomography synthesis in prostate radiotherapy\",\"authors\":\"Blanche Texier , Cédric Hémon , Adélie Queffélec , Jason Dowling , Igor Bessieres , Peter Greer , Oscar Acosta , Adrien Boue-Rafle , Renaud de Crevoisier , Caroline Lafond , Joël Castelli , Anaïs Barateau , Jean-Claude Nunes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-to-computed tomography (CT) synthesis is essential in MRI-only radiotherapy workflows, particularly through deep learning techniques known for their accuracy. However, current supervised methods are limited to specific center’s learnings and depend on registration precision. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of unsupervised and supervised approaches in the context of prostate MRI-to-CT generation for radiotherapy dose calculation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>CT/MRI image pairs from 99 prostate cancer patients across three different centers were used. A comparison between supervised and unsupervised conditional Generative Adversarial Networks (cGAN) was conducted. Unsupervised training incorporates a style transfer method with. Content and Style Representation for Enhanced Perceptual synthesis (CREPs) loss. For dose evaluation, the photon prescription dose was 60 Gy delivered in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Imaging endpoint for sCT evaluation was Mean Absolute Error (MAE). Dosimetric endpoints included absolute dose differences and gamma analysis between CT and sCT dose calculations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The unsupervised paired network exhibited the highest accuracy for the body with a MAE at 33.6 HU, the highest MAE was 45.5 HU obtained with unsupervised unpaired learning. All architectures provided clinically acceptable results for dose calculation with gamma pass rates above 94 % (1 % 1 mm 10 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study shows that multicenter data can produce accurate sCTs via unsupervised learning, eliminating CT-MRI registration. The sCTs not only matched HU values but also enabled precise dose calculations, suggesting their potential for wider use in MRI-only radiotherapy workflows.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"31 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100612\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000824/pdfft?md5=452e70a66f63e6bbc801a2ec1489bae9&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624000824-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000824\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的磁共振成像(MRI)-计算机断层扫描(CT)合成在纯磁共振放疗工作流程中至关重要,特别是通过以准确性著称的深度学习技术。然而,目前的监督方法仅限于特定中心的学习,并且依赖于配准精度。本研究的目的是评估在前列腺 MRI-to-CT 生成放疗剂量计算中,无监督和有监督方法的准确性。对有监督和无监督条件生成对抗网络(cGAN)进行了比较。无监督训练结合了一种风格转移方法,该方法具有...增强感知合成(CREPs)损失的内容和风格表示。在剂量评估方面,光子处方剂量为60 Gy,以体积调制弧治疗(VMAT)的方式进行。sCT评估的成像终点是平均绝对误差(MAE)。结果无监督配对网络对人体的准确性最高,平均绝对误差为 33.6 HU,无监督非配对学习的最高平均绝对误差为 45.5 HU。所有架构都提供了临床上可接受的剂量计算结果,伽马通过率超过 94 %(1 % 1 mm 10 %)。这些 sCT 不仅与 HU 值相匹配,而且还能进行精确的剂量计算,这表明它们有可能在纯磁共振放疗工作流程中得到更广泛的应用。
3D Unsupervised deep learning method for magnetic resonance imaging-to-computed tomography synthesis in prostate radiotherapy
Background and purpose
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-to-computed tomography (CT) synthesis is essential in MRI-only radiotherapy workflows, particularly through deep learning techniques known for their accuracy. However, current supervised methods are limited to specific center’s learnings and depend on registration precision. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of unsupervised and supervised approaches in the context of prostate MRI-to-CT generation for radiotherapy dose calculation.
Methods
CT/MRI image pairs from 99 prostate cancer patients across three different centers were used. A comparison between supervised and unsupervised conditional Generative Adversarial Networks (cGAN) was conducted. Unsupervised training incorporates a style transfer method with. Content and Style Representation for Enhanced Perceptual synthesis (CREPs) loss. For dose evaluation, the photon prescription dose was 60 Gy delivered in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Imaging endpoint for sCT evaluation was Mean Absolute Error (MAE). Dosimetric endpoints included absolute dose differences and gamma analysis between CT and sCT dose calculations.
Results
The unsupervised paired network exhibited the highest accuracy for the body with a MAE at 33.6 HU, the highest MAE was 45.5 HU obtained with unsupervised unpaired learning. All architectures provided clinically acceptable results for dose calculation with gamma pass rates above 94 % (1 % 1 mm 10 %).
Conclusions
This study shows that multicenter data can produce accurate sCTs via unsupervised learning, eliminating CT-MRI registration. The sCTs not only matched HU values but also enabled precise dose calculations, suggesting their potential for wider use in MRI-only radiotherapy workflows.