{"title":"快速、慢速和分级 Suryanamaskar 对心肺功能和心脏自主神经功能的急性影响","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.07.049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Suryanamaskar (SN) is a popular yogic practice due to its health benefits and fitness promises. This study aims to assess the acute effects of different paces of SN on cardiorespiratory responses and heart rate variability (HRV).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this self-as-control comparative study, seventeen male yoga practitioners performed three rounds of SN at fast (FSN), slow (SSN), and graded (GSN) pace in a randomly allocated sequence. Cardiorespiratory responses and HRV kinetics were continuously monitored using a metabolic gas analyzer and heart rate sensor, respectively, and were analyzed by repeated-measures ANOVA and paired <em>t</em>-test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>FSN involved the highest VO<sub>2</sub>, followed by GSN and SSN. Average HR (AHR) was significantly greater during FSN compared to SSN (p < 0.01; <em>d</em> = 0.81) and GSN (p < 0.05; <em>d</em> = 0.39). GSN demanded significantly higher (p < 0.05; <em>d</em> = 0.41) stroke volume compared to FSN. VO<sub>2</sub>, AHR, and energy expenditure (EE) showed a gradual increase across rounds in FSN and SSN, whereas in GSN those significantly reduced. SSN showed significantly lesser EE, fat% utilization, and METS as compared to FSN (p < 0.001) and GSN (p < 0.01). SSN also showed significantly reduced LF power (p < 0.01; <em>d</em> = 0.67), LF/HF ratio, and higher HF power than GSN and FSN.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>FSN is more metabolically demanding compared to the other two paces. SSN is more effective in bringing a state of parasympathetic dominance and GSN brings progressive relaxation. The results provide insights into the acute HRV and cardio-metabolic responses to different SN paces suggesting its potential as a complementary therapy and to promote holistic health and well-being.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute effects of fast, slow, and graded Suryanamaskar on cardiorespiratory and cardiac autonomic functions\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.07.049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Suryanamaskar (SN) is a popular yogic practice due to its health benefits and fitness promises. This study aims to assess the acute effects of different paces of SN on cardiorespiratory responses and heart rate variability (HRV).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this self-as-control comparative study, seventeen male yoga practitioners performed three rounds of SN at fast (FSN), slow (SSN), and graded (GSN) pace in a randomly allocated sequence. Cardiorespiratory responses and HRV kinetics were continuously monitored using a metabolic gas analyzer and heart rate sensor, respectively, and were analyzed by repeated-measures ANOVA and paired <em>t</em>-test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>FSN involved the highest VO<sub>2</sub>, followed by GSN and SSN. Average HR (AHR) was significantly greater during FSN compared to SSN (p < 0.01; <em>d</em> = 0.81) and GSN (p < 0.05; <em>d</em> = 0.39). GSN demanded significantly higher (p < 0.05; <em>d</em> = 0.41) stroke volume compared to FSN. VO<sub>2</sub>, AHR, and energy expenditure (EE) showed a gradual increase across rounds in FSN and SSN, whereas in GSN those significantly reduced. SSN showed significantly lesser EE, fat% utilization, and METS as compared to FSN (p < 0.001) and GSN (p < 0.01). SSN also showed significantly reduced LF power (p < 0.01; <em>d</em> = 0.67), LF/HF ratio, and higher HF power than GSN and FSN.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>FSN is more metabolically demanding compared to the other two paces. SSN is more effective in bringing a state of parasympathetic dominance and GSN brings progressive relaxation. The results provide insights into the acute HRV and cardio-metabolic responses to different SN paces suggesting its potential as a complementary therapy and to promote holistic health and well-being.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224003851\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224003851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景Suryanamaskar(SN)因其对健康的益处和健身的承诺而成为一种流行的瑜伽练习。本研究的目的是评估不同步速的瑜伽练习对心肺反应和心率变异性(HRV)的急性影响。方法在这项自我对照比较研究中,17 名男性瑜伽练习者按照随机分配的顺序,以快速(FSN)、慢速(SSN)和分级(GSN)步速进行了三轮瑜伽练习。分别使用代谢气体分析仪和心率传感器连续监测心肺反应和心率变异动力学,并采用重复测量方差分析和配对 t 检验进行分析。与 SSN(p < 0.01; d = 0.81)和 GSN(p < 0.05; d = 0.39)相比,FSN 期间的平均心率(AHR)明显更高。与 FSN 相比,GSN 要求的划槳量明显更高 (p < 0.05; d = 0.41)。FSN 和 SSN 的 VO2、AHR 和能量消耗(EE)在各轮比赛中逐渐增加,而 GSN 则明显减少。与 FSN(p < 0.001)和 GSN(p < 0.01)相比,SSN 的能量消耗、脂肪利用率和 METS 明显降低。与 GSN 和 FSN 相比,SSN 的低频功率(p < 0.01; d = 0.67)、低频/高频比值和高频功率也明显降低。SSN能更有效地带来副交感神经主导状态,而GSN则能带来渐进式放松。这些结果提供了对不同 SN 步调的急性心率变异和心血管代谢反应的见解,表明其具有作为辅助疗法和促进整体健康和福祉的潜力。
Acute effects of fast, slow, and graded Suryanamaskar on cardiorespiratory and cardiac autonomic functions
Background
Suryanamaskar (SN) is a popular yogic practice due to its health benefits and fitness promises. This study aims to assess the acute effects of different paces of SN on cardiorespiratory responses and heart rate variability (HRV).
Methods
In this self-as-control comparative study, seventeen male yoga practitioners performed three rounds of SN at fast (FSN), slow (SSN), and graded (GSN) pace in a randomly allocated sequence. Cardiorespiratory responses and HRV kinetics were continuously monitored using a metabolic gas analyzer and heart rate sensor, respectively, and were analyzed by repeated-measures ANOVA and paired t-test.
Results
FSN involved the highest VO2, followed by GSN and SSN. Average HR (AHR) was significantly greater during FSN compared to SSN (p < 0.01; d = 0.81) and GSN (p < 0.05; d = 0.39). GSN demanded significantly higher (p < 0.05; d = 0.41) stroke volume compared to FSN. VO2, AHR, and energy expenditure (EE) showed a gradual increase across rounds in FSN and SSN, whereas in GSN those significantly reduced. SSN showed significantly lesser EE, fat% utilization, and METS as compared to FSN (p < 0.001) and GSN (p < 0.01). SSN also showed significantly reduced LF power (p < 0.01; d = 0.67), LF/HF ratio, and higher HF power than GSN and FSN.
Conclusion
FSN is more metabolically demanding compared to the other two paces. SSN is more effective in bringing a state of parasympathetic dominance and GSN brings progressive relaxation. The results provide insights into the acute HRV and cardio-metabolic responses to different SN paces suggesting its potential as a complementary therapy and to promote holistic health and well-being.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina