移民与失业。本地人的理解正确吗?

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2024.06.004
{"title":"移民与失业。本地人的理解正确吗?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2024.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We analyse whether natives correctly assess the effects of immigration on their own labour market<span><span> opportunities. We relate self-reported job loss and job finding probabilities to the presence of foreign-born residents in a native’s neighbourhood. We interpret coefficient estimates through the lens of a learning model that allows us to disentangle the true effect of immigration from the perception bias. Our results show that natives greatly overestimate the effects of immigrants on their likelihood of losing the current job against the lack of significant true effects; job seekers’ perceptions are instead broadly unaffected, a largely correct assessment given the failure to detect significant true effects. Overestimation of the adverse effects of immigration on separation rates is concentrated among females, the low educated, the youths, the residents of smaller towns and employees on permanent contracts; the complementary groups appear to correctly assess that immigration has at best only modest effects. We briefly discuss the implications of these findings for the interpretation of empirical work on the </span>labour market effects of immigration.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immigration and unemployment. Do natives get it right?\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jebo.2024.06.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We analyse whether natives correctly assess the effects of immigration on their own labour market<span><span> opportunities. We relate self-reported job loss and job finding probabilities to the presence of foreign-born residents in a native’s neighbourhood. We interpret coefficient estimates through the lens of a learning model that allows us to disentangle the true effect of immigration from the perception bias. Our results show that natives greatly overestimate the effects of immigrants on their likelihood of losing the current job against the lack of significant true effects; job seekers’ perceptions are instead broadly unaffected, a largely correct assessment given the failure to detect significant true effects. Overestimation of the adverse effects of immigration on separation rates is concentrated among females, the low educated, the youths, the residents of smaller towns and employees on permanent contracts; the complementary groups appear to correctly assess that immigration has at best only modest effects. We briefly discuss the implications of these findings for the interpretation of empirical work on the </span>labour market effects of immigration.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268124002221\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268124002221","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们分析了本地人是否正确评估了移民对其自身劳动力市场机会的影响。我们将自我报告的失业和找到工作的概率与本地人所在社区是否有外国出生的居民联系起来。我们通过学习模型来解释系数估计值,从而将移民的真实影响与认知偏差区分开来。我们的结果表明,在缺乏显著真实影响的情况下,本地人大大高估了移民对其失去当前工作的可能性的影响;求职者的认知反而大致不受影响,鉴于未能检测到显著的真实影响,这一评估基本正确。高估移民对离职率不利影响的人群主要集中在女性、低学历者、年轻人、小城镇居民和长期合同雇员中;互补群体似乎正确地评估了移民的影响,认为移民充其量只能产生适度的影响。我们简要讨论了这些结论对解释有关移民对劳动力市场影响的实证工作的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Immigration and unemployment. Do natives get it right?

We analyse whether natives correctly assess the effects of immigration on their own labour market opportunities. We relate self-reported job loss and job finding probabilities to the presence of foreign-born residents in a native’s neighbourhood. We interpret coefficient estimates through the lens of a learning model that allows us to disentangle the true effect of immigration from the perception bias. Our results show that natives greatly overestimate the effects of immigrants on their likelihood of losing the current job against the lack of significant true effects; job seekers’ perceptions are instead broadly unaffected, a largely correct assessment given the failure to detect significant true effects. Overestimation of the adverse effects of immigration on separation rates is concentrated among females, the low educated, the youths, the residents of smaller towns and employees on permanent contracts; the complementary groups appear to correctly assess that immigration has at best only modest effects. We briefly discuss the implications of these findings for the interpretation of empirical work on the labour market effects of immigration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization is devoted to theoretical and empirical research concerning economic decision, organization and behavior and to economic change in all its aspects. Its specific purposes are to foster an improved understanding of how human cognitive, computational and informational characteristics influence the working of economic organizations and market economies and how an economy structural features lead to various types of micro and macro behavior, to changing patterns of development and to institutional evolution. Research with these purposes that explore the interrelations of economics with other disciplines such as biology, psychology, law, anthropology, sociology and mathematics is particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Productivity losses in the transition to Daylight Saving Time: Evidence from hourly GitHub activity How risk aversion shapes the trade-off between commitment and flexibility Host country household spending and foreign subsidiary performance: The role of local knowledge, entry mode strategies, and the digital economy Economic impacts of a drastic gas supply shock and short-term mitigation strategies Resolving lawsuits with a decisive oath: An economic analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1