康有为《日本书目》:中国思想现代化的起源。康有为:《日本书目》。德米特里-马尔蒂诺夫(Dmitry E. Martynov)从中文译成俄文并撰写前言。

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY VOPROSY FILOSOFII Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.21146/0042-8744-2024-5-195-207
Liu Liqiu, Dmitry Martynov, Yulia Martynova
{"title":"康有为《日本书目》:中国思想现代化的起源。康有为:《日本书目》。德米特里-马尔蒂诺夫(Dmitry E. Martynov)从中文译成俄文并撰写前言。","authors":"Liu Liqiu, Dmitry Martynov, Yulia Martynova","doi":"10.21146/0042-8744-2024-5-195-207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the evolution of the worldview of the outstanding Chi­nese reformer and philosopher Kang Youwei (1858–1927) in the second half of the 1890s. The “Japanese Bibliography” compiled by him in 1897 was a land­mark work for the perception of modern scientific terminology in China, and at the same time indicates that on the eve of the Reform Movement of 1898, Kang Youwei still remained in the position of Neo-Confucianism, did not try to synthesize Confucian concepts with contemporary scientific picture of the world and Darwinian evolutionary theory. The preface to the Japanese Bibliography proves that the process of formulating the philosophy of history and the basic law of history (change of the Three Eras) by Kang Youwei was far from com­pleted, and he did not use the concept of the Great Unity (Da Tong). Kang Youwei stated that the scientific and technological superiority of the Western Powers is secondary, but the primary thing is the world “battle of minds”, in which countries that have embarked on the path of catching-up development have a chance to overtake the former hegemons. An example is given of Imperial Japan, whose intellectuals were able to synthesize Western philosophy with East­ern thinking and hieroglyphic writing. To accelerate the Westernization of China, the apologist of which was then Kang Youwei, Japanese experience should be fully used, including already completed translations of scientific and technical literature into Japanese. When compiling the Bibliography, Kang Youwei was not yet able to propose an original taxonomy of scientific knowledge and used ready-made samples. A radical change in his thinking came only at the beginning of the twentieth century.","PeriodicalId":46795,"journal":{"name":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Japanese Bibliography by Kang Youwei: The Origins of the Modernization of Chinese Thought. Kang Youwei, Japanese Bibliography. Foreword, Trans. from Chinese into Russian and Comm. by Dmitry E. Martynov\",\"authors\":\"Liu Liqiu, Dmitry Martynov, Yulia Martynova\",\"doi\":\"10.21146/0042-8744-2024-5-195-207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article examines the evolution of the worldview of the outstanding Chi­nese reformer and philosopher Kang Youwei (1858–1927) in the second half of the 1890s. The “Japanese Bibliography” compiled by him in 1897 was a land­mark work for the perception of modern scientific terminology in China, and at the same time indicates that on the eve of the Reform Movement of 1898, Kang Youwei still remained in the position of Neo-Confucianism, did not try to synthesize Confucian concepts with contemporary scientific picture of the world and Darwinian evolutionary theory. The preface to the Japanese Bibliography proves that the process of formulating the philosophy of history and the basic law of history (change of the Three Eras) by Kang Youwei was far from com­pleted, and he did not use the concept of the Great Unity (Da Tong). Kang Youwei stated that the scientific and technological superiority of the Western Powers is secondary, but the primary thing is the world “battle of minds”, in which countries that have embarked on the path of catching-up development have a chance to overtake the former hegemons. An example is given of Imperial Japan, whose intellectuals were able to synthesize Western philosophy with East­ern thinking and hieroglyphic writing. To accelerate the Westernization of China, the apologist of which was then Kang Youwei, Japanese experience should be fully used, including already completed translations of scientific and technical literature into Japanese. When compiling the Bibliography, Kang Youwei was not yet able to propose an original taxonomy of scientific knowledge and used ready-made samples. A radical change in his thinking came only at the beginning of the twentieth century.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VOPROSY FILOSOFII\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VOPROSY FILOSOFII\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2024-5-195-207\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2024-5-195-207","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章探讨了中国杰出的改革家和哲学家康有为(1858-1927 年)的世界观在 19 世纪 90 年代后半期的演变。康有为在 1897 年编撰的《日本书目》是中国人认识现代科学术语的里程碑,同时也表明,在 1898 年戊戌变法前夕,康有为仍停留在新儒家的立场上,没有尝试将儒家观念与现代科学的世界观和达尔文进化论相结合。日本书目》的序言证明,康有为的历史哲学和历史基本规律(三代之变)的形成过程远未完成,他也没有使用大一统(大同)的概念。康有为指出,西方列强的科技优势是次要的,最主要的是世界 "思想之争",走上赶超发展道路的国家有机会超越昔日的霸主。以日本帝国为例,其知识分子能够将西方哲学与东方思维和象形文字融会贯通。为了加快中国的西化进程,应该充分利用日本的经验,包括将已经完成的科技文献翻译成日文。在编制《书目》时,康有为尚未能提出独创的科学知识分类法,而是使用现成的样本。直到 20 世纪初,他的思想才发生了彻底的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Japanese Bibliography by Kang Youwei: The Origins of the Modernization of Chinese Thought. Kang Youwei, Japanese Bibliography. Foreword, Trans. from Chinese into Russian and Comm. by Dmitry E. Martynov
The article examines the evolution of the worldview of the outstanding Chi­nese reformer and philosopher Kang Youwei (1858–1927) in the second half of the 1890s. The “Japanese Bibliography” compiled by him in 1897 was a land­mark work for the perception of modern scientific terminology in China, and at the same time indicates that on the eve of the Reform Movement of 1898, Kang Youwei still remained in the position of Neo-Confucianism, did not try to synthesize Confucian concepts with contemporary scientific picture of the world and Darwinian evolutionary theory. The preface to the Japanese Bibliography proves that the process of formulating the philosophy of history and the basic law of history (change of the Three Eras) by Kang Youwei was far from com­pleted, and he did not use the concept of the Great Unity (Da Tong). Kang Youwei stated that the scientific and technological superiority of the Western Powers is secondary, but the primary thing is the world “battle of minds”, in which countries that have embarked on the path of catching-up development have a chance to overtake the former hegemons. An example is given of Imperial Japan, whose intellectuals were able to synthesize Western philosophy with East­ern thinking and hieroglyphic writing. To accelerate the Westernization of China, the apologist of which was then Kang Youwei, Japanese experience should be fully used, including already completed translations of scientific and technical literature into Japanese. When compiling the Bibliography, Kang Youwei was not yet able to propose an original taxonomy of scientific knowledge and used ready-made samples. A radical change in his thinking came only at the beginning of the twentieth century.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
VOPROSY FILOSOFII
VOPROSY FILOSOFII PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: "Вопросы философии" - академическое научное издание, центральный философский журнал в России. В настоящее время является органом Президиума Российской Академии Наук. Журнал "Вопросы философии" исторически тесно связан с Институтом философии РАН. Выходит ежемесячно. Журнал был основан в июле 1947 г. Интернет-версия журнала запущена в мае 2009 года.
期刊最新文献
The Guardian of the History of Philosophy: On Nelly Motroschilova’s Philosophical Beginnings Maimonides, Gersonides and Crescas on Prophets and Prophecy The Neurological Interpretation of the Myth-ritual Complex: Pro et Contra Worlds of Consciousness in the Context of Multiverse Conceptions Specifics of Expert Activity in Modern Applied Science (Review of Survey Results)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1