Sophia Pinton , Fernanda Furlan Gonçalves Dias , Larry A. Lerno , Juliana Maria Leite Nobrega de Moura Bell
{"title":"通过 pH 值、蛋白水解和微波处理的定制协同作用,提高未发酵赤霞珠葡萄渣中生物活性酚的提取率","authors":"Sophia Pinton , Fernanda Furlan Gonçalves Dias , Larry A. Lerno , Juliana Maria Leite Nobrega de Moura Bell","doi":"10.1016/j.fbp.2024.07.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The impact of enzyme-assisted (EAE), microwave-assisted (MAE), and microwave enzyme-assisted (MEAE) extractions using water were evaluated and compared to aqueous (AEP), conventional ethanolic (CSE), and microwave ethanolic (MSE) controls for the release of phenolics from Cabernet Sauvignon grape pomace. Optimization of extract total phenolic content (TPC) involved stepwise screening of time, temperature, slurry pH, solids-to-liquid ratio, and enzyme conditions. The use of 0.1 % alkaline protease in MEAE (1:10 g pomace/mL water, pH 11.5, 70 °C, 30 min) reduced extraction time by 50 % compared to AEP, EAE, and CSE methods, doubling the TPC of the extracts to 100.9 mg GAE/g dry weight pomace compared to ethanolic extractions. MAE and MEAE extracts exhibited <em>in vitro</em> antioxidant activities (ABTS and ORAC) similar to ethanolic extracts and had greater antioxidant activities than AEP/EAE extracts while boosting relative contents of catechins, procyanidins, <em>trans</em>-piceid, and malvidin-3,5-diglucoside as detected by untargeted metabolomics. Quantitation by HPLC showed increased levels of gallic acid, protocatechuic acid, syringic acid, <em>p</em>-coumaric acid, polymeric phenols, and polymeric pigments in MEAE compared to hydroethanolic methods. Scanning electron microscopy further supported the synergistic role of microwave processing and proteolysis in disrupting the grape cell structure to aid in releasing valuable bioactive phenolic compounds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12134,"journal":{"name":"Food and Bioproducts Processing","volume":"147 ","pages":"Pages 359-373"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960308524001354/pdfft?md5=63de001e130202f30f3ddf3c508c741e&pid=1-s2.0-S0960308524001354-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing bioactive phenolic extraction from unfermented Cabernet Sauvignon pomace through tailored synergies of pH, proteolysis, and microwave processing\",\"authors\":\"Sophia Pinton , Fernanda Furlan Gonçalves Dias , Larry A. Lerno , Juliana Maria Leite Nobrega de Moura Bell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fbp.2024.07.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The impact of enzyme-assisted (EAE), microwave-assisted (MAE), and microwave enzyme-assisted (MEAE) extractions using water were evaluated and compared to aqueous (AEP), conventional ethanolic (CSE), and microwave ethanolic (MSE) controls for the release of phenolics from Cabernet Sauvignon grape pomace. Optimization of extract total phenolic content (TPC) involved stepwise screening of time, temperature, slurry pH, solids-to-liquid ratio, and enzyme conditions. The use of 0.1 % alkaline protease in MEAE (1:10 g pomace/mL water, pH 11.5, 70 °C, 30 min) reduced extraction time by 50 % compared to AEP, EAE, and CSE methods, doubling the TPC of the extracts to 100.9 mg GAE/g dry weight pomace compared to ethanolic extractions. MAE and MEAE extracts exhibited <em>in vitro</em> antioxidant activities (ABTS and ORAC) similar to ethanolic extracts and had greater antioxidant activities than AEP/EAE extracts while boosting relative contents of catechins, procyanidins, <em>trans</em>-piceid, and malvidin-3,5-diglucoside as detected by untargeted metabolomics. Quantitation by HPLC showed increased levels of gallic acid, protocatechuic acid, syringic acid, <em>p</em>-coumaric acid, polymeric phenols, and polymeric pigments in MEAE compared to hydroethanolic methods. Scanning electron microscopy further supported the synergistic role of microwave processing and proteolysis in disrupting the grape cell structure to aid in releasing valuable bioactive phenolic compounds.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food and Bioproducts Processing\",\"volume\":\"147 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 359-373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960308524001354/pdfft?md5=63de001e130202f30f3ddf3c508c741e&pid=1-s2.0-S0960308524001354-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food and Bioproducts Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960308524001354\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Bioproducts Processing","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960308524001354","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Enhancing bioactive phenolic extraction from unfermented Cabernet Sauvignon pomace through tailored synergies of pH, proteolysis, and microwave processing
The impact of enzyme-assisted (EAE), microwave-assisted (MAE), and microwave enzyme-assisted (MEAE) extractions using water were evaluated and compared to aqueous (AEP), conventional ethanolic (CSE), and microwave ethanolic (MSE) controls for the release of phenolics from Cabernet Sauvignon grape pomace. Optimization of extract total phenolic content (TPC) involved stepwise screening of time, temperature, slurry pH, solids-to-liquid ratio, and enzyme conditions. The use of 0.1 % alkaline protease in MEAE (1:10 g pomace/mL water, pH 11.5, 70 °C, 30 min) reduced extraction time by 50 % compared to AEP, EAE, and CSE methods, doubling the TPC of the extracts to 100.9 mg GAE/g dry weight pomace compared to ethanolic extractions. MAE and MEAE extracts exhibited in vitro antioxidant activities (ABTS and ORAC) similar to ethanolic extracts and had greater antioxidant activities than AEP/EAE extracts while boosting relative contents of catechins, procyanidins, trans-piceid, and malvidin-3,5-diglucoside as detected by untargeted metabolomics. Quantitation by HPLC showed increased levels of gallic acid, protocatechuic acid, syringic acid, p-coumaric acid, polymeric phenols, and polymeric pigments in MEAE compared to hydroethanolic methods. Scanning electron microscopy further supported the synergistic role of microwave processing and proteolysis in disrupting the grape cell structure to aid in releasing valuable bioactive phenolic compounds.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of the European Federation of Chemical Engineering:
Part C
FBP aims to be the principal international journal for publication of high quality, original papers in the branches of engineering and science dedicated to the safe processing of biological products. It is the only journal to exploit the synergy between biotechnology, bioprocessing and food engineering.
Papers showing how research results can be used in engineering design, and accounts of experimental or theoretical research work bringing new perspectives to established principles, highlighting unsolved problems or indicating directions for future research, are particularly welcome. Contributions that deal with new developments in equipment or processes and that can be given quantitative expression are encouraged. The journal is especially interested in papers that extend the boundaries of food and bioproducts processing.
The journal has a strong emphasis on the interface between engineering and food or bioproducts. Papers that are not likely to be published are those:
• Primarily concerned with food formulation
• That use experimental design techniques to obtain response surfaces but gain little insight from them
• That are empirical and ignore established mechanistic models, e.g., empirical drying curves
• That are primarily concerned about sensory evaluation and colour
• Concern the extraction, encapsulation and/or antioxidant activity of a specific biological material without providing insight that could be applied to a similar but different material,
• Containing only chemical analyses of biological materials.