南海海盆黄昏区再矿化的约束:多种方法相互比较的启示

IF 3.8 3区 地球科学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY Progress in Oceanography Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1016/j.pocean.2024.103316
Chao Xu , Mingwang Xiang , Bingzhang Chen , Yibin Huang , Guoqiang Qiu , Yuchen Zhang , Haili Wang , Bangqin Huang
{"title":"南海海盆黄昏区再矿化的约束:多种方法相互比较的启示","authors":"Chao Xu ,&nbsp;Mingwang Xiang ,&nbsp;Bingzhang Chen ,&nbsp;Yibin Huang ,&nbsp;Guoqiang Qiu ,&nbsp;Yuchen Zhang ,&nbsp;Haili Wang ,&nbsp;Bangqin Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.pocean.2024.103316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The twilight zone remineralization (TZR) consumes over 70% of organic carbon exported from the sunlit ocean, significantly affecting oceanic carbon sequestration and atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration. Despite the well-established importance, the quantification of TZR remains challenging, as reflected by conspicuous methodological discrepancy and the unsolved imbalance between carbon supply from the upper layer and demand at depth. Here we combined three independent approaches, including biogeochemical profiling floats (BGC-float) observation, <em>in vivo</em> reduction of the tetrazolium salt by the cellular electron transport system (<em>in vivo</em> INT), and the synthesis of prokaryotic respiration (PR) determined by radiolabeled leucine incorporation and zooplankton respiration (ZR) empirically estimated from the biomass (PR + ZR), to investigate the TZR in the South China Sea basin. Our results show that the BGC-float and PR + ZR approaches gave more consistent results, with the respective values of 5.1 ± 0.5 and 6.4 ± 3.0 mol C m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. However, <em>in vivo</em> INT approach yielded a TZR nearly an order of magnitude higher at 30.0 ± 6.1 mol C m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. To further reconcile methodological discrepancies, we estimated the possible range of carbon supply by integrating comprehensive carbon sources, including sinking particles, dissolved organic carbon input, lateral transport, dark carbon fixation, and active carbon transport by zooplankton migration. After considering multiple carbon sources, we successfully balanced the carbon demand as indicated by BGC-float and PR + ZR approaches. Our intercomparison exercise suggests a potential overestimation of TZR by the <em>in vivo</em> INT approach, and also highlights the importance of integrating multiple carbon sources in closing the twilight zone carbon budget.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20620,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Oceanography","volume":"228 ","pages":"Article 103316"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constraining the twilight zone remineralization in the South China Sea basin: Insights from the multi-method intercomparison\",\"authors\":\"Chao Xu ,&nbsp;Mingwang Xiang ,&nbsp;Bingzhang Chen ,&nbsp;Yibin Huang ,&nbsp;Guoqiang Qiu ,&nbsp;Yuchen Zhang ,&nbsp;Haili Wang ,&nbsp;Bangqin Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pocean.2024.103316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The twilight zone remineralization (TZR) consumes over 70% of organic carbon exported from the sunlit ocean, significantly affecting oceanic carbon sequestration and atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration. Despite the well-established importance, the quantification of TZR remains challenging, as reflected by conspicuous methodological discrepancy and the unsolved imbalance between carbon supply from the upper layer and demand at depth. Here we combined three independent approaches, including biogeochemical profiling floats (BGC-float) observation, <em>in vivo</em> reduction of the tetrazolium salt by the cellular electron transport system (<em>in vivo</em> INT), and the synthesis of prokaryotic respiration (PR) determined by radiolabeled leucine incorporation and zooplankton respiration (ZR) empirically estimated from the biomass (PR + ZR), to investigate the TZR in the South China Sea basin. Our results show that the BGC-float and PR + ZR approaches gave more consistent results, with the respective values of 5.1 ± 0.5 and 6.4 ± 3.0 mol C m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. However, <em>in vivo</em> INT approach yielded a TZR nearly an order of magnitude higher at 30.0 ± 6.1 mol C m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. To further reconcile methodological discrepancies, we estimated the possible range of carbon supply by integrating comprehensive carbon sources, including sinking particles, dissolved organic carbon input, lateral transport, dark carbon fixation, and active carbon transport by zooplankton migration. After considering multiple carbon sources, we successfully balanced the carbon demand as indicated by BGC-float and PR + ZR approaches. Our intercomparison exercise suggests a potential overestimation of TZR by the <em>in vivo</em> INT approach, and also highlights the importance of integrating multiple carbon sources in closing the twilight zone carbon budget.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Oceanography\",\"volume\":\"228 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Oceanography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079661124001228\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OCEANOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Oceanography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079661124001228","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

暮光区再矿化(TZR)消耗了从日照海洋输出的 70% 以上的有机碳,对海洋碳固存和大气二氧化碳浓度产生了重大影响。尽管TZR的重要性已得到证实,但其量化仍具有挑战性,这体现在方法上的明显差异以及上层碳供应与深层碳需求之间的不平衡。在此,我们结合了三种独立的方法,包括生物地球化学剖面浮标(BGC-float)观测、细胞电子传递系统对四氮唑盐的体内还原(体内 INT)、放射性标记亮氨酸掺入确定的原核生物呼吸(PR)与根据生物量经验估算的浮游动物呼吸(ZR)的合成(PR + ZR),来研究南海海盆的 TZR。研究结果表明,浮游浮游生物量法和浮游浮游生物量 + ZR 法得出的结果较为一致,分别为 5.1 ± 0.5 和 6.4 ± 3.0 mol C m-2 yr-1。然而,体内 INT 方法得出的 TZR 值要高出近一个数量级,为 30.0 ± 6.1 mol C m-2 yr-1。为了进一步协调方法上的差异,我们综合了各种碳源,包括下沉颗粒、溶解有机碳输入、横向迁移、暗碳固定以及浮游动物迁移产生的活性碳迁移,从而估算了碳供应的可能范围。在考虑了多种碳源之后,我们成功地平衡了 BGC-浮游法和 PR + ZR 法所显示的碳需求。我们的相互比较结果表明,活体 INT 方法可能会高估 TZR,同时也强调了整合多种碳源对关闭黄昏区碳预算的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Constraining the twilight zone remineralization in the South China Sea basin: Insights from the multi-method intercomparison

The twilight zone remineralization (TZR) consumes over 70% of organic carbon exported from the sunlit ocean, significantly affecting oceanic carbon sequestration and atmospheric CO2 concentration. Despite the well-established importance, the quantification of TZR remains challenging, as reflected by conspicuous methodological discrepancy and the unsolved imbalance between carbon supply from the upper layer and demand at depth. Here we combined three independent approaches, including biogeochemical profiling floats (BGC-float) observation, in vivo reduction of the tetrazolium salt by the cellular electron transport system (in vivo INT), and the synthesis of prokaryotic respiration (PR) determined by radiolabeled leucine incorporation and zooplankton respiration (ZR) empirically estimated from the biomass (PR + ZR), to investigate the TZR in the South China Sea basin. Our results show that the BGC-float and PR + ZR approaches gave more consistent results, with the respective values of 5.1 ± 0.5 and 6.4 ± 3.0 mol C m−2 yr−1. However, in vivo INT approach yielded a TZR nearly an order of magnitude higher at 30.0 ± 6.1 mol C m−2 yr−1. To further reconcile methodological discrepancies, we estimated the possible range of carbon supply by integrating comprehensive carbon sources, including sinking particles, dissolved organic carbon input, lateral transport, dark carbon fixation, and active carbon transport by zooplankton migration. After considering multiple carbon sources, we successfully balanced the carbon demand as indicated by BGC-float and PR + ZR approaches. Our intercomparison exercise suggests a potential overestimation of TZR by the in vivo INT approach, and also highlights the importance of integrating multiple carbon sources in closing the twilight zone carbon budget.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Oceanography
Progress in Oceanography 地学-海洋学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.90%
发文量
138
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Progress in Oceanography publishes the longer, more comprehensive papers that most oceanographers feel are necessary, on occasion, to do justice to their work. Contributions are generally either a review of an aspect of oceanography or a treatise on an expanding oceanographic subject. The articles cover the entire spectrum of disciplines within the science of oceanography. Occasionally volumes are devoted to collections of papers and conference proceedings of exceptional interest. Essential reading for all oceanographers.
期刊最新文献
The influence of applying skin temperature corrections to gas exchange models on air-sea oxygen flux estimates Perspectives on Northern Gulf of Alaska salinity field structure, freshwater pathways, and controlling mechanisms Seasonal variations of the cold intermediate layer on the Newfoundland and Labrador Shelf Changes in prey-predator interactions in an Arctic food web under climate change Reduced phytoplankton biomass in a subtropical plume-upwelling system induced by typhoons Bailu and Podul
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1