腹腔镜手术中使用子宫操作器后的子宫内膜癌复发

IF 1.2 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Gynecologic Oncology Reports Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1016/j.gore.2024.101468
Jessica M. Souza , Kristen Stearns , Fang-Chi Hsu , Laurel K. Berry , Michael G. Kelly , Janelle P. Darby
{"title":"腹腔镜手术中使用子宫操作器后的子宫内膜癌复发","authors":"Jessica M. Souza ,&nbsp;Kristen Stearns ,&nbsp;Fang-Chi Hsu ,&nbsp;Laurel K. Berry ,&nbsp;Michael G. Kelly ,&nbsp;Janelle P. Darby","doi":"10.1016/j.gore.2024.101468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is the standard approach for the staging and treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) and often includes use of a uterine manipulator. Uterine perforation is a known risk in this setting, and the impact of perforation and tumor spillage on cancer recurrence is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the association between uterine perforation and/or tumor spillage at the time of MIS for low-grade, early-stage EC on disease recurrence.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted including patients who underwent MIS for management of low-grade and early-stage EC with use of a uterine manipulator. Rates of disease recurrence were compared between patients with and without documented uterine perforation and/or tumor spillage at the time of surgery. Statistical significance was defined as p &lt; 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>408 patients with low-grade and early-stage EC were identified from the tumor registry and included in the study. Uterine perforation and/or tumor spillage was documented in 5.9 % (24/408) of cases. Recurrent disease was noted in 8.1 % (33/408) of the entire cohort. Most patients had isolated local recurrence (23/33; 69.7 %), while 9.1 % (3/33) had distant recurrence and 21.2 % (7/33) had both local and distant recurrence. There was no association between uterine perforation and/or tumor spillage and recurrence rates (p = 0.67). The trend in disease free survival was shorter among patients with these complications.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our analysis did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in disease recurrence rates among patients with early-stage, low-grade EC based on uterine perforation and/or tumor spillage at the time of surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12873,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578924001474/pdfft?md5=138f90e8533ea2ec67fc3b2596b85efc&pid=1-s2.0-S2352578924001474-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endometrial cancer recurrence after the use of a uterine manipulator during laparoscopic surgery\",\"authors\":\"Jessica M. Souza ,&nbsp;Kristen Stearns ,&nbsp;Fang-Chi Hsu ,&nbsp;Laurel K. Berry ,&nbsp;Michael G. Kelly ,&nbsp;Janelle P. Darby\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gore.2024.101468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is the standard approach for the staging and treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) and often includes use of a uterine manipulator. Uterine perforation is a known risk in this setting, and the impact of perforation and tumor spillage on cancer recurrence is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the association between uterine perforation and/or tumor spillage at the time of MIS for low-grade, early-stage EC on disease recurrence.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted including patients who underwent MIS for management of low-grade and early-stage EC with use of a uterine manipulator. Rates of disease recurrence were compared between patients with and without documented uterine perforation and/or tumor spillage at the time of surgery. Statistical significance was defined as p &lt; 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>408 patients with low-grade and early-stage EC were identified from the tumor registry and included in the study. Uterine perforation and/or tumor spillage was documented in 5.9 % (24/408) of cases. Recurrent disease was noted in 8.1 % (33/408) of the entire cohort. Most patients had isolated local recurrence (23/33; 69.7 %), while 9.1 % (3/33) had distant recurrence and 21.2 % (7/33) had both local and distant recurrence. There was no association between uterine perforation and/or tumor spillage and recurrence rates (p = 0.67). The trend in disease free survival was shorter among patients with these complications.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our analysis did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in disease recurrence rates among patients with early-stage, low-grade EC based on uterine perforation and/or tumor spillage at the time of surgery.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologic Oncology Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578924001474/pdfft?md5=138f90e8533ea2ec67fc3b2596b85efc&pid=1-s2.0-S2352578924001474-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologic Oncology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578924001474\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578924001474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的微创手术(MIS)是早期子宫内膜癌(EC)分期和治疗的标准方法,通常包括使用子宫操作器。在这种情况下,子宫穿孔是一种已知的风险,而穿孔和肿瘤溢出对癌症复发的影响在很大程度上尚属未知。本研究旨在评估低级别早期EC MIS手术时子宫穿孔和/或肿瘤溢出与疾病复发之间的关系。方法:本研究进行了一项回顾性单中心队列研究,研究对象包括接受MIS手术治疗低级别和早期EC并使用子宫操作器的患者。比较了手术时有和没有子宫穿孔和/或肿瘤溢出记录的患者的疾病复发率。结果408名低度和早期EC患者从肿瘤登记处被确认并纳入研究。5.9%的病例(24/408)有子宫穿孔和/或肿瘤溢出的记录。在所有病例中,有8.1%(33/408)的患者出现复发。大多数患者为局部复发(23/33;69.7%),9.1%(3/33)为远处复发,21.2%(7/33)同时为局部和远处复发。子宫穿孔和/或肿瘤溢出与复发率之间没有关联(P = 0.67)。结论我们的分析并未显示早期低分化癌患者的复发率因手术时子宫穿孔和/或肿瘤溢出而存在统计学意义上的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endometrial cancer recurrence after the use of a uterine manipulator during laparoscopic surgery

Objective

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is the standard approach for the staging and treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) and often includes use of a uterine manipulator. Uterine perforation is a known risk in this setting, and the impact of perforation and tumor spillage on cancer recurrence is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the association between uterine perforation and/or tumor spillage at the time of MIS for low-grade, early-stage EC on disease recurrence.

Methods

A retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted including patients who underwent MIS for management of low-grade and early-stage EC with use of a uterine manipulator. Rates of disease recurrence were compared between patients with and without documented uterine perforation and/or tumor spillage at the time of surgery. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

Results

408 patients with low-grade and early-stage EC were identified from the tumor registry and included in the study. Uterine perforation and/or tumor spillage was documented in 5.9 % (24/408) of cases. Recurrent disease was noted in 8.1 % (33/408) of the entire cohort. Most patients had isolated local recurrence (23/33; 69.7 %), while 9.1 % (3/33) had distant recurrence and 21.2 % (7/33) had both local and distant recurrence. There was no association between uterine perforation and/or tumor spillage and recurrence rates (p = 0.67). The trend in disease free survival was shorter among patients with these complications.

Conclusions

Our analysis did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in disease recurrence rates among patients with early-stage, low-grade EC based on uterine perforation and/or tumor spillage at the time of surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Gynecologic Oncology Reports OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
183
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Gynecologic Oncology Reports is an online-only, open access journal devoted to the rapid publication of narrative review articles, survey articles, case reports, case series, letters to the editor regarding previously published manuscripts and other short communications in the field of gynecologic oncology. The journal will consider papers that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract, with originality, quality, and clarity the chief criteria of acceptance.
期刊最新文献
When ovarian mature teratoma peritonitis mimics cancer: What is the best treatment? High Rates of Germline Pathogenic Variants in Somali Patients with Ovarian Cancer Sleep characteristics and recurrence in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer survivors: A prospective cohort study Implementation of enhanced recovery protocols in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for metastatic ovarian cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A feasibility study Rehabilitation of pelvic floor dysfunction after radiation therapy for a rare gynecological cancer: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1