比较Y型平衡测试-下四分位和星形偏移平衡测试的到达距离:练习者是否使用了正确的协议?

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Physical Therapy in Sport Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.07.007
James G. Bodden, Robert A. Needham, Nachiappan Chockalingam
{"title":"比较Y型平衡测试-下四分位和星形偏移平衡测试的到达距离:练习者是否使用了正确的协议?","authors":"James G. Bodden,&nbsp;Robert A. Needham,&nbsp;Nachiappan Chockalingam","doi":"10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To compare reach distances between the YBT-LQ and SEBT using the correct protocols as outlined by the developers. This will provide an accurate insight on the actual magnitude differences in reach distance between the movement screen tests and will safeguard practitioners on the subsequent use of these outcomes to inform clinical decision making.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Observational.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Laboratory.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Participants included sixteen healthy female subjects from the university and amateur sports teams.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome</h3><p>Reach distances in the anterior direction (ANT), posterior medial (PM) and posterior lateral (PL) between participants on the YBT-LQ and SEBT.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The principal findings highlighted that a statistically significantly greater reach distance on the left and right side for the YBT-LQ compared to the SEBT in the ANT, PM, and PL directions (p &lt; 0.0005).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results of this study suggest that the YBT-LQ and SEBT are not comparable tests due to the differences in reach distance and methodological differences. Therefore, previous, and future research using the YBT-LQ and SEBT cannot be used interchangeably. Not following developed guidelines questions the applicability of the findings of reach distance scores to infer on performance and assessment of injury risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49698,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy in Sport","volume":"69 ","pages":"Pages 84-90"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X24000786/pdfft?md5=41ccb0dc4224c253005bc907368427b9&pid=1-s2.0-S1466853X24000786-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing reach distance between the Y-Balance Test-Lower Quarter and Star Excursion Balance Test: Are practitioners using the correct protocol?\",\"authors\":\"James G. Bodden,&nbsp;Robert A. Needham,&nbsp;Nachiappan Chockalingam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.07.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To compare reach distances between the YBT-LQ and SEBT using the correct protocols as outlined by the developers. This will provide an accurate insight on the actual magnitude differences in reach distance between the movement screen tests and will safeguard practitioners on the subsequent use of these outcomes to inform clinical decision making.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Observational.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Laboratory.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Participants included sixteen healthy female subjects from the university and amateur sports teams.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome</h3><p>Reach distances in the anterior direction (ANT), posterior medial (PM) and posterior lateral (PL) between participants on the YBT-LQ and SEBT.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The principal findings highlighted that a statistically significantly greater reach distance on the left and right side for the YBT-LQ compared to the SEBT in the ANT, PM, and PL directions (p &lt; 0.0005).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results of this study suggest that the YBT-LQ and SEBT are not comparable tests due to the differences in reach distance and methodological differences. Therefore, previous, and future research using the YBT-LQ and SEBT cannot be used interchangeably. Not following developed guidelines questions the applicability of the findings of reach distance scores to infer on performance and assessment of injury risk.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Therapy in Sport\",\"volume\":\"69 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 84-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X24000786/pdfft?md5=41ccb0dc4224c253005bc907368427b9&pid=1-s2.0-S1466853X24000786-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Therapy in Sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X24000786\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy in Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X24000786","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标按照开发人员概述的正确方案,比较 YBT-LQ 和 SEBT 的伸展距离。这将为运动筛查测试之间的伸展距离的实际大小差异提供准确的见解,并为从业人员随后使用这些结果为临床决策提供依据提供保障。主要结果参加者在 YBT-LQ 和 SEBT 中的前方(ANT)、后内侧(PM)和后外侧(PL)的伸展距离.结果主要研究结果表明,与 SEBT 相比,YBT-LQ 在 ANT、PM 和 PL 方向上的左侧和右侧伸展距离具有显著的统计学意义(P < 0.结论本研究的结果表明,YBT-LQ 和 SEBT 由于在触及距离和方法上的差异而不具有可比性。因此,以前和未来使用 YBT-LQ 和 SEBT 的研究不能互换使用。如果不遵循已制定的指导原则,就会质疑伸展距离评分结果在推断运动表现和评估受伤风险方面的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing reach distance between the Y-Balance Test-Lower Quarter and Star Excursion Balance Test: Are practitioners using the correct protocol?

Objectives

To compare reach distances between the YBT-LQ and SEBT using the correct protocols as outlined by the developers. This will provide an accurate insight on the actual magnitude differences in reach distance between the movement screen tests and will safeguard practitioners on the subsequent use of these outcomes to inform clinical decision making.

Design

Observational.

Setting

Laboratory.

Participants

Participants included sixteen healthy female subjects from the university and amateur sports teams.

Main outcome

Reach distances in the anterior direction (ANT), posterior medial (PM) and posterior lateral (PL) between participants on the YBT-LQ and SEBT.

Results

The principal findings highlighted that a statistically significantly greater reach distance on the left and right side for the YBT-LQ compared to the SEBT in the ANT, PM, and PL directions (p < 0.0005).

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that the YBT-LQ and SEBT are not comparable tests due to the differences in reach distance and methodological differences. Therefore, previous, and future research using the YBT-LQ and SEBT cannot be used interchangeably. Not following developed guidelines questions the applicability of the findings of reach distance scores to infer on performance and assessment of injury risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Therapy in Sport
Physical Therapy in Sport 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
125
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy in Sport is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for the publication of research and clinical practice material relevant to the healthcare professions involved in sports and exercise medicine, and rehabilitation. The journal publishes material that is indispensable for day-to-day practice and continuing professional development. Physical Therapy in Sport covers topics dealing with the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of injuries, as well as more general areas of sports and exercise medicine and related sports science. The journal publishes original research, case studies, reviews, masterclasses, papers on clinical approaches, and book reviews, as well as occasional reports from conferences. Papers are double-blind peer-reviewed by our international advisory board and other international experts, and submissions from a broad range of disciplines are actively encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Monitoring hip adductor strength in professional women's football players over a season: A prospective study The application of a return-to-performance pathway for a professional footballer recovering from a surgical repair of an isolated lateral collateral knee ligament rupture. A case report Comparison of short term recovery in patients with midportion Achilles tendinopathy with varying degrees of kinesiophobia treated with the Silbernagel protocol: A prospective single cohort analysis Quantifying the difference between male and female agility in football players: A cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1