美国吸烟者长期双重使用香烟和电子烟与社会心理因素之间的关系:2013年至2019年PATH研究的二手数据分析

{"title":"美国吸烟者长期双重使用香烟和电子烟与社会心理因素之间的关系:2013年至2019年PATH研究的二手数据分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.heha.2024.100103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Dual use of combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes is common among U.S. tobacco users, yet misperceptions about the harm of dual use persist, often oversimplifying its multifaceted exposure and health impacts. To address this gap, we evaluated the association of prolonged dual use (consecutive use for more than 1 year) with psychosocial factors, including perceptions of absolute and relative harm of e-cigarettes, social norms, and intentions to quit smoking, among U.S. adult smokers over time.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using the data from Waves 1 to 5 (2013–2019) from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, we characterized dual use and prolonged dual use by sociodemographics and psychosocial factors among U.S. adult smokers. We examined the association between dual use, including prolonged dual use, and psychosocial factors over time using logistic regression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Dual use of smokers decreased from 19.8 % in 2013 to 16.4 % in 2019, and prolonged dual use among dual users decreased from 40.0 % in 2013 to 27.4 % in 2019. Prolonged dual users, independent of frequency of use, presented significantly higher cigarette dependence than temporary dual users. The perception of absolute e-cigarette harm (perceiving e-cigarettes as very or extremely harmful) was negatively associated with prolonged dual use. No significant association was found between prolonged dual use and perception of relative e-cigarette harm (perceiving e-cigarettes are less harmful that cigarettes) as well with intentions to quit smoking and beliefs that most people disapprove of e-cigarette use.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>: Increased perceptions of absolute harm of e-cigarettes, rather than relative harm, appear to decrease prolonged dual use. Public health strategies should consider further emphasis in educating users of the absolute harm, as opposed to endorsing e-cigarette use as a harm reduction alternative, in their tobacco cessation efforts to further discourage dual use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73269,"journal":{"name":"Hygiene and environmental health advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773049224000163/pdfft?md5=12e5d20389317eb976e7821e55a0355f&pid=1-s2.0-S2773049224000163-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between prolonged dual use of cigarettes and E-cigarettes and psychosocial factors among U.S. Smokers: Secondary data analysis from the 2013 to 2019 PATH study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.heha.2024.100103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Dual use of combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes is common among U.S. tobacco users, yet misperceptions about the harm of dual use persist, often oversimplifying its multifaceted exposure and health impacts. To address this gap, we evaluated the association of prolonged dual use (consecutive use for more than 1 year) with psychosocial factors, including perceptions of absolute and relative harm of e-cigarettes, social norms, and intentions to quit smoking, among U.S. adult smokers over time.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using the data from Waves 1 to 5 (2013–2019) from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, we characterized dual use and prolonged dual use by sociodemographics and psychosocial factors among U.S. adult smokers. We examined the association between dual use, including prolonged dual use, and psychosocial factors over time using logistic regression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Dual use of smokers decreased from 19.8 % in 2013 to 16.4 % in 2019, and prolonged dual use among dual users decreased from 40.0 % in 2013 to 27.4 % in 2019. Prolonged dual users, independent of frequency of use, presented significantly higher cigarette dependence than temporary dual users. The perception of absolute e-cigarette harm (perceiving e-cigarettes as very or extremely harmful) was negatively associated with prolonged dual use. No significant association was found between prolonged dual use and perception of relative e-cigarette harm (perceiving e-cigarettes are less harmful that cigarettes) as well with intentions to quit smoking and beliefs that most people disapprove of e-cigarette use.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>: Increased perceptions of absolute harm of e-cigarettes, rather than relative harm, appear to decrease prolonged dual use. Public health strategies should consider further emphasis in educating users of the absolute harm, as opposed to endorsing e-cigarette use as a harm reduction alternative, in their tobacco cessation efforts to further discourage dual use.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hygiene and environmental health advances\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773049224000163/pdfft?md5=12e5d20389317eb976e7821e55a0355f&pid=1-s2.0-S2773049224000163-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hygiene and environmental health advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773049224000163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hygiene and environmental health advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773049224000163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 可燃卷烟和电子烟的双重使用在美国烟草使用者中很普遍,但人们对双重使用危害的误解却一直存在,往往将其多方面的暴露和健康影响过于简单化。为了弥补这一不足,我们评估了美国成年吸烟者长期双重使用(连续使用超过 1 年)与社会心理因素的关系,包括对电子烟绝对和相对危害的认知、社会规范和戒烟意愿。方法利用烟草与健康人群评估(PATH)研究第 1 波至第 5 波(2013-2019 年)的数据,我们根据美国成年吸烟者的社会人口统计学和社会心理因素对双重使用和长期双重使用进行了描述。我们使用逻辑回归法研究了双重使用(包括长期双重使用)与心理社会因素之间随时间变化的关联。结果吸烟者的双重使用率从 2013 年的 19.8% 降至 2019 年的 16.4%,双重使用者中的长期双重使用率从 2013 年的 40.0% 降至 2019 年的 27.4%。与使用频率无关,长期双重使用者的卷烟依赖性明显高于临时双重使用者。对电子烟绝对危害的认知(认为电子烟非常有害或极其有害)与长期双重使用者呈负相关。长期双重使用电子烟与相对电子烟危害认知(认为电子烟比香烟危害小)以及戒烟意愿和大多数人不赞成使用电子烟的信念之间没有明显关联:提高对电子烟绝对危害而非相对危害的认识似乎会减少长期双重使用电子烟的情况。公共卫生策略应考虑在戒烟工作中进一步强调对使用者进行绝对危害教育,而不是将使用电子烟作为减少危害的替代方法,以进一步阻止双重使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association between prolonged dual use of cigarettes and E-cigarettes and psychosocial factors among U.S. Smokers: Secondary data analysis from the 2013 to 2019 PATH study

Objective

Dual use of combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes is common among U.S. tobacco users, yet misperceptions about the harm of dual use persist, often oversimplifying its multifaceted exposure and health impacts. To address this gap, we evaluated the association of prolonged dual use (consecutive use for more than 1 year) with psychosocial factors, including perceptions of absolute and relative harm of e-cigarettes, social norms, and intentions to quit smoking, among U.S. adult smokers over time.

Methods

Using the data from Waves 1 to 5 (2013–2019) from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, we characterized dual use and prolonged dual use by sociodemographics and psychosocial factors among U.S. adult smokers. We examined the association between dual use, including prolonged dual use, and psychosocial factors over time using logistic regression.

Results

Dual use of smokers decreased from 19.8 % in 2013 to 16.4 % in 2019, and prolonged dual use among dual users decreased from 40.0 % in 2013 to 27.4 % in 2019. Prolonged dual users, independent of frequency of use, presented significantly higher cigarette dependence than temporary dual users. The perception of absolute e-cigarette harm (perceiving e-cigarettes as very or extremely harmful) was negatively associated with prolonged dual use. No significant association was found between prolonged dual use and perception of relative e-cigarette harm (perceiving e-cigarettes are less harmful that cigarettes) as well with intentions to quit smoking and beliefs that most people disapprove of e-cigarette use.

Conclusion

: Increased perceptions of absolute harm of e-cigarettes, rather than relative harm, appear to decrease prolonged dual use. Public health strategies should consider further emphasis in educating users of the absolute harm, as opposed to endorsing e-cigarette use as a harm reduction alternative, in their tobacco cessation efforts to further discourage dual use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hygiene and environmental health advances
Hygiene and environmental health advances Environmental Science (General)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
期刊最新文献
Occupational chemical safety and management: A case study to identify best practices for sustainable advancement of Bangladesh Black box analysis with linear regression on global warming Removal mechanism of decabromodiphenyl ether in soil by Cu/Fe nanoparticles Expansion of a versatile pathogen: Clostridioides difficile From human cohorts to plant cohorts: The potential of plants in epidemiological studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1