金融科技对传统和伊斯兰可持续股票的影响:数字金融生态系统的短期和长期贡献

IF 5.5 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Global Finance Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1016/j.gfj.2024.101022
Mahdi Ghaemi Asl , Sami Ben Jabeur , Seyedeh Sana Hosseini , Hamed Tajmir Riahi
{"title":"金融科技对传统和伊斯兰可持续股票的影响:数字金融生态系统的短期和长期贡献","authors":"Mahdi Ghaemi Asl ,&nbsp;Sami Ben Jabeur ,&nbsp;Seyedeh Sana Hosseini ,&nbsp;Hamed Tajmir Riahi","doi":"10.1016/j.gfj.2024.101022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the integration of cutting-edge financial technologies, such as distributed ledger diversity, next-generation payment trackers, democratized banking, and cryptocurrency, and their impact on global sustainability and ethical ratings in Islamic markets. Our analysis spans the period from May 31, 2018, to May 10, 2023, and uses a novel analytical framework based on quantile time–frequency connectedness and causality analysis. Results showed that democratized banking, future payment opportunities, and sustainability-screened markets had stronger associations than distributed ledger technologies and crypto-based tokenization. Second, Islamic sustainable markets have slightly closer ties to the digital financial ecosystem than traditional responsible investments. Third, causality analysis revealed bidirectional relationships between sustainable markets and democratized banking and potential payment opportunities in the short to mid-term. Fourth, in the short term, there was unidirectional causality from conscious markets to investments in digitized currencies and blockchains; however, no long-term causality between the digital financial ecosystem and sustainability investments. Fifth, the diversity of distributed ledgers had a limited relationship with green investments, whereas advanced transaction monitoring platforms and inclusive financial infrastructure could serve as catalysts for nature-based portfolios. These findings inform policymakers in green finance and provide insights for digital financial network strategists, investors, and regulators, enabling sustainable interdisciplinary investment practices. This comprehensive examination sheds light on the evolving landscape of sustainable finance in the context of rapidly advancing financial technologies, paving the way for informed decision-making and strategic planning in the field of green investments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46907,"journal":{"name":"Global Finance Journal","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 101022"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fintech's impact on conventional and Islamic sustainable equities: Short- and long-term contributions of the digital financial ecosystem\",\"authors\":\"Mahdi Ghaemi Asl ,&nbsp;Sami Ben Jabeur ,&nbsp;Seyedeh Sana Hosseini ,&nbsp;Hamed Tajmir Riahi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gfj.2024.101022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigates the integration of cutting-edge financial technologies, such as distributed ledger diversity, next-generation payment trackers, democratized banking, and cryptocurrency, and their impact on global sustainability and ethical ratings in Islamic markets. Our analysis spans the period from May 31, 2018, to May 10, 2023, and uses a novel analytical framework based on quantile time–frequency connectedness and causality analysis. Results showed that democratized banking, future payment opportunities, and sustainability-screened markets had stronger associations than distributed ledger technologies and crypto-based tokenization. Second, Islamic sustainable markets have slightly closer ties to the digital financial ecosystem than traditional responsible investments. Third, causality analysis revealed bidirectional relationships between sustainable markets and democratized banking and potential payment opportunities in the short to mid-term. Fourth, in the short term, there was unidirectional causality from conscious markets to investments in digitized currencies and blockchains; however, no long-term causality between the digital financial ecosystem and sustainability investments. Fifth, the diversity of distributed ledgers had a limited relationship with green investments, whereas advanced transaction monitoring platforms and inclusive financial infrastructure could serve as catalysts for nature-based portfolios. These findings inform policymakers in green finance and provide insights for digital financial network strategists, investors, and regulators, enabling sustainable interdisciplinary investment practices. This comprehensive examination sheds light on the evolving landscape of sustainable finance in the context of rapidly advancing financial technologies, paving the way for informed decision-making and strategic planning in the field of green investments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Finance Journal\",\"volume\":\"62 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101022\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Finance Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044028324000942\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Finance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044028324000942","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了分布式分类账多样性、下一代支付追踪器、民主化银行业务和加密货币等尖端金融技术的整合及其对全球可持续性和伊斯兰市场道德评级的影响。我们的分析时间跨度为 2018 年 5 月 31 日至 2023 年 5 月 10 日,并采用了基于量化时间频率关联性和因果关系分析的新型分析框架。结果显示,与分布式账本技术和基于加密货币的代币化相比,民主化银行、未来支付机会和可持续性筛选市场具有更强的关联性。其次,与传统的责任投资相比,伊斯兰可持续市场与数字金融生态系统的联系更紧密。第三,因果关系分析揭示了可持续市场与民主化银行业务和中短期潜在支付机会之间的双向关系。第四,从短期来看,有意识市场与数字化货币和区块链投资之间存在单向因果关系;但数字金融生态系统与可持续性投资之间不存在长期因果关系。第五,分布式账本的多样性与绿色投资之间的关系有限,而先进的交易监测平台和包容性金融基础设施则可以成为基于自然的投资组合的催化剂。这些发现为绿色金融的政策制定者提供了信息,也为数字金融网络战略家、投资者和监管者提供了见解,从而促成了可持续的跨学科投资实践。在金融技术飞速发展的背景下,这项全面的研究揭示了可持续金融不断演变的格局,为绿色投资领域的知情决策和战略规划铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fintech's impact on conventional and Islamic sustainable equities: Short- and long-term contributions of the digital financial ecosystem

This study investigates the integration of cutting-edge financial technologies, such as distributed ledger diversity, next-generation payment trackers, democratized banking, and cryptocurrency, and their impact on global sustainability and ethical ratings in Islamic markets. Our analysis spans the period from May 31, 2018, to May 10, 2023, and uses a novel analytical framework based on quantile time–frequency connectedness and causality analysis. Results showed that democratized banking, future payment opportunities, and sustainability-screened markets had stronger associations than distributed ledger technologies and crypto-based tokenization. Second, Islamic sustainable markets have slightly closer ties to the digital financial ecosystem than traditional responsible investments. Third, causality analysis revealed bidirectional relationships between sustainable markets and democratized banking and potential payment opportunities in the short to mid-term. Fourth, in the short term, there was unidirectional causality from conscious markets to investments in digitized currencies and blockchains; however, no long-term causality between the digital financial ecosystem and sustainability investments. Fifth, the diversity of distributed ledgers had a limited relationship with green investments, whereas advanced transaction monitoring platforms and inclusive financial infrastructure could serve as catalysts for nature-based portfolios. These findings inform policymakers in green finance and provide insights for digital financial network strategists, investors, and regulators, enabling sustainable interdisciplinary investment practices. This comprehensive examination sheds light on the evolving landscape of sustainable finance in the context of rapidly advancing financial technologies, paving the way for informed decision-making and strategic planning in the field of green investments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Finance Journal
Global Finance Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
13.50%
发文量
106
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Global Finance Journal provides a forum for the exchange of ideas and techniques among academicians and practitioners and, thereby, advances applied research in global financial management. Global Finance Journal publishes original, creative, scholarly research that integrates theory and practice and addresses a readership in both business and academia. Articles reflecting pragmatic research are sought in areas such as financial management, investment, banking and financial services, accounting, and taxation. Global Finance Journal welcomes contributions from scholars in both the business and academic community and encourages collaborative research from this broad base worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Business group heterogeneity and firm outcomes: Evidence from Korean chaebols Under the microscope: Trade initiation activities around earnings and takeover announcements in a market with continuous disclosure Stock, foreign exchange and commodity markets linkages: Implications for risk diversification and portfolio management Value of climate change news: A textual analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1