P19.腰椎管狭窄症手术后膀胱功能障碍的风险因素

{"title":"P19.腰椎管狭窄症手术后膀胱功能障碍的风险因素","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background Context</h3><p>The occurrence of postoperative bladder dysfunction is one of the most confusing complications for both patients and surgeons after lumbar spinal canal stenosis surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the risk factors for newly-onset postoperative bladder dysfunction.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design/Setting</h3><p>Retrospective study.</p></div><div><h3>Patient Sample</h3><p>The study enrolled 738 cases among the patients who underwent lumbar spinal canal stenosis surgery between 2005 and 2020. Patients with severe preoperative bladder dysfunction (incontinence and urinary retention) or perioperative complications (intraoperative dural injury and long-term urinary catheter placement) were excluded. Patients who had urinary retention for at least 1 week after postoperative urinary catheter removal or who needed intermittent urinary drainage were included in the study.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome Measures</h3><p>The study items included patient background (age, sex, and duration), preoperative JOA score, and surgical factors (surgical procedures and number of decompressed segments). Propensity score-matching was performed at a ratio of 1:2 (postoperative bladder dysfunction group: subject group), and patient background (BMI, smoking history, comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes)), laboratory data (Cre, Chol, TG), imaging findings (lumbar spine alignment, dural canal area at each vertebra, type of cauda equina redundancy), and surgical factors (operation time, blood loss, and history of lumbar surgery) were investigated.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for postoperative bladder dysfunction.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Postoperative bladder dysfunction occurred in 23 (3.1 %) patients. At 1 year postoperatively, three patients required continued intermittent voiding, and four patients required continued medical treatment. Although the median recovery time in the improvement group was 41 days, only 12 patients (52.2%) showed improvement 3 months after surgery. Patients with postoperative bladder dysfunction were significantly older in all patient data. There were no significant differences in sex, duration, surgical procedures, or the number of decompressed segments. Univariate analysis performed after propensity score matching showed significant differences in imaging findings of curve type of cauda equina, ventral or dorsal deviation of the compressed dura mater, and the lumbar Cobb angle. There were no significant differences in laboratory data, history of lumbar surgery, or dural tube area at the most compressed segment. Multivariate analysis of all three factors was an independent factor.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Regardless of the preoperative patient background, surgical procedures, or number of decompressed segments, older patients and those with curve-type cauda equina were at a higher risk of developing postoperative bladder dysfunction. In such cases, the impact on the dural canal and cauda equina during decompression may be stronger, with increased susceptibility to heat injury and neuropathy. It is also possible that the cauda equina is more susceptible to significant downward traction after decompression than straight-type compression of the cauda equina, necessitating more careful informed consent and wider decompression during surgery for these patients.</p></div><div><h3>FDA Device/Drug Status</h3><p>This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548424001161/pdfft?md5=fcf55c5d714e679ed1f8f4699ca26bd8&pid=1-s2.0-S2666548424001161-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P19. Risk factors for postoperative bladder dysfunction in lumbar spinal canal stenosis surgery\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100423\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background Context</h3><p>The occurrence of postoperative bladder dysfunction is one of the most confusing complications for both patients and surgeons after lumbar spinal canal stenosis surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the risk factors for newly-onset postoperative bladder dysfunction.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design/Setting</h3><p>Retrospective study.</p></div><div><h3>Patient Sample</h3><p>The study enrolled 738 cases among the patients who underwent lumbar spinal canal stenosis surgery between 2005 and 2020. Patients with severe preoperative bladder dysfunction (incontinence and urinary retention) or perioperative complications (intraoperative dural injury and long-term urinary catheter placement) were excluded. Patients who had urinary retention for at least 1 week after postoperative urinary catheter removal or who needed intermittent urinary drainage were included in the study.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome Measures</h3><p>The study items included patient background (age, sex, and duration), preoperative JOA score, and surgical factors (surgical procedures and number of decompressed segments). Propensity score-matching was performed at a ratio of 1:2 (postoperative bladder dysfunction group: subject group), and patient background (BMI, smoking history, comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes)), laboratory data (Cre, Chol, TG), imaging findings (lumbar spine alignment, dural canal area at each vertebra, type of cauda equina redundancy), and surgical factors (operation time, blood loss, and history of lumbar surgery) were investigated.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for postoperative bladder dysfunction.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Postoperative bladder dysfunction occurred in 23 (3.1 %) patients. At 1 year postoperatively, three patients required continued intermittent voiding, and four patients required continued medical treatment. Although the median recovery time in the improvement group was 41 days, only 12 patients (52.2%) showed improvement 3 months after surgery. Patients with postoperative bladder dysfunction were significantly older in all patient data. There were no significant differences in sex, duration, surgical procedures, or the number of decompressed segments. Univariate analysis performed after propensity score matching showed significant differences in imaging findings of curve type of cauda equina, ventral or dorsal deviation of the compressed dura mater, and the lumbar Cobb angle. There were no significant differences in laboratory data, history of lumbar surgery, or dural tube area at the most compressed segment. Multivariate analysis of all three factors was an independent factor.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Regardless of the preoperative patient background, surgical procedures, or number of decompressed segments, older patients and those with curve-type cauda equina were at a higher risk of developing postoperative bladder dysfunction. In such cases, the impact on the dural canal and cauda equina during decompression may be stronger, with increased susceptibility to heat injury and neuropathy. It is also possible that the cauda equina is more susceptible to significant downward traction after decompression than straight-type compression of the cauda equina, necessitating more careful informed consent and wider decompression during surgery for these patients.</p></div><div><h3>FDA Device/Drug Status</h3><p>This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"North American Spine Society Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548424001161/pdfft?md5=fcf55c5d714e679ed1f8f4699ca26bd8&pid=1-s2.0-S2666548424001161-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"North American Spine Society Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548424001161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Spine Society Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548424001161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景膀胱功能障碍是腰椎管狭窄症手术后患者和外科医生最困惑的并发症之一。目的研究新发膀胱功能障碍的风险因素。排除术前有严重膀胱功能障碍(尿失禁和尿潴留)或围术期并发症(术中硬膜损伤和长期导尿管置入)的患者。研究项目包括患者背景(年龄、性别和病程)、术前 JOA 评分和手术因素(手术过程和减压节段数量)。按照 1:2 的比例进行倾向得分匹配(术后膀胱功能障碍组:受试者组),并对患者背景(体重指数、吸烟史、合并症(高血压、糖尿病))、实验室数据(Cre、胆固醇、总胆固醇)、影像学结果(腰椎排列、每个椎体的硬膜管面积、马尾赘生物类型)和手术因素(手术时间、失血量和腰椎手术史)进行调查。结果 23 例(3.1%)患者术后出现膀胱功能障碍。术后 1 年,3 名患者需要继续间歇性排尿,4 名患者需要继续接受药物治疗。虽然改善组的中位恢复时间为 41 天,但只有 12 名患者(52.2%)在术后 3 个月有所改善。在所有患者数据中,术后膀胱功能障碍患者的年龄明显偏大。在性别、病程、手术过程或减压节段数量方面没有明显差异。倾向得分匹配后进行的单变量分析显示,马尾曲线类型、受压硬脑膜的腹侧或背侧偏移以及腰椎Cobb角的成像结果存在显著差异。实验室数据、腰椎手术史或最受压段硬膜管面积无明显差异。结论无论术前患者的背景、手术过程或减压节段的数量如何,年龄较大的患者和有曲线型马尾的患者术后出现膀胱功能障碍的风险较高。在这种情况下,减压时对硬脊膜管和马尾的影响可能更大,更容易出现热损伤和神经病变。也有可能马尾在减压后比马尾直型压迫更容易受到明显的向下牵引,因此这些患者在手术中需要更谨慎的知情同意和更大范围的减压。FDA 器械/药物状态本摘要未讨论或包含任何适用的器械或药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
P19. Risk factors for postoperative bladder dysfunction in lumbar spinal canal stenosis surgery

Background Context

The occurrence of postoperative bladder dysfunction is one of the most confusing complications for both patients and surgeons after lumbar spinal canal stenosis surgery.

Purpose

To investigate the risk factors for newly-onset postoperative bladder dysfunction.

Study Design/Setting

Retrospective study.

Patient Sample

The study enrolled 738 cases among the patients who underwent lumbar spinal canal stenosis surgery between 2005 and 2020. Patients with severe preoperative bladder dysfunction (incontinence and urinary retention) or perioperative complications (intraoperative dural injury and long-term urinary catheter placement) were excluded. Patients who had urinary retention for at least 1 week after postoperative urinary catheter removal or who needed intermittent urinary drainage were included in the study.

Outcome Measures

The study items included patient background (age, sex, and duration), preoperative JOA score, and surgical factors (surgical procedures and number of decompressed segments). Propensity score-matching was performed at a ratio of 1:2 (postoperative bladder dysfunction group: subject group), and patient background (BMI, smoking history, comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes)), laboratory data (Cre, Chol, TG), imaging findings (lumbar spine alignment, dural canal area at each vertebra, type of cauda equina redundancy), and surgical factors (operation time, blood loss, and history of lumbar surgery) were investigated.

Methods

Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for postoperative bladder dysfunction.

Results

Postoperative bladder dysfunction occurred in 23 (3.1 %) patients. At 1 year postoperatively, three patients required continued intermittent voiding, and four patients required continued medical treatment. Although the median recovery time in the improvement group was 41 days, only 12 patients (52.2%) showed improvement 3 months after surgery. Patients with postoperative bladder dysfunction were significantly older in all patient data. There were no significant differences in sex, duration, surgical procedures, or the number of decompressed segments. Univariate analysis performed after propensity score matching showed significant differences in imaging findings of curve type of cauda equina, ventral or dorsal deviation of the compressed dura mater, and the lumbar Cobb angle. There were no significant differences in laboratory data, history of lumbar surgery, or dural tube area at the most compressed segment. Multivariate analysis of all three factors was an independent factor.

Conclusions

Regardless of the preoperative patient background, surgical procedures, or number of decompressed segments, older patients and those with curve-type cauda equina were at a higher risk of developing postoperative bladder dysfunction. In such cases, the impact on the dural canal and cauda equina during decompression may be stronger, with increased susceptibility to heat injury and neuropathy. It is also possible that the cauda equina is more susceptible to significant downward traction after decompression than straight-type compression of the cauda equina, necessitating more careful informed consent and wider decompression during surgery for these patients.

FDA Device/Drug Status

This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
48 days
期刊最新文献
Genetics and pathogenesis of scoliosis Incidence of temporary intraoperative iliac artery occlusion during anterior spinal surgery The hidden risk: Intracranial hemorrhage following durotomies in spine surgery Sequential correction of sagittal vertical alignment and lumbar lordosis in adult flatback deformity Spinal alignment and surgical correction in the aging spine and osteoporotic patient
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1