Amir Hatami, S. Naoum, R. Lee, J. M. Razza, M. Goonewardene
{"title":"澳大利亚正畸医生对加速正畸治疗的看法和态度","authors":"Amir Hatami, S. Naoum, R. Lee, J. M. Razza, M. Goonewardene","doi":"10.2478/aoj-2024-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to survey the perception and attitude of Australian orthodontists toward accelerated orthodontic treatments.\n \n \n \n An online questionnaire was distributed to 427 members of the Australian Society of Orthodontists. The questions related to: clinic demographics, familiarity with appliances/procedures to accelerate orthodontic treatment, the use of appliances/procedures to accelerate orthodontic treatment, and satisfaction with the outcomes when employing these appliances/procedures.\n \n \n \n The response rate was 42.38%. Of the respondents, 26.6% used customised fixed appliances which provided satisfactory outcomes. A small proportion of the respondents routinely used adjunctive procedures to accelerate treatment: 3.5% (n=6) corticotomies, 1.2% (n=2) piezocision, and 1.2% (n=2) intraoral vibrating devices.\n \n \n \n Although a significant number of Australian orthodontists use customised fixed appliances to improve the efficiency of orthodontic treatment, the use of adjunctive procedures to accelerate tooth movement remains very low. Further research is needed to understand the possible limitations and restrictions surrounding this area of practice.\n","PeriodicalId":48559,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Orthodontic Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Orthodontists’ perception and attitude toward accelerated orthodontic treatments in Australia\",\"authors\":\"Amir Hatami, S. Naoum, R. Lee, J. M. Razza, M. Goonewardene\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/aoj-2024-0017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to survey the perception and attitude of Australian orthodontists toward accelerated orthodontic treatments.\\n \\n \\n \\n An online questionnaire was distributed to 427 members of the Australian Society of Orthodontists. The questions related to: clinic demographics, familiarity with appliances/procedures to accelerate orthodontic treatment, the use of appliances/procedures to accelerate orthodontic treatment, and satisfaction with the outcomes when employing these appliances/procedures.\\n \\n \\n \\n The response rate was 42.38%. Of the respondents, 26.6% used customised fixed appliances which provided satisfactory outcomes. A small proportion of the respondents routinely used adjunctive procedures to accelerate treatment: 3.5% (n=6) corticotomies, 1.2% (n=2) piezocision, and 1.2% (n=2) intraoral vibrating devices.\\n \\n \\n \\n Although a significant number of Australian orthodontists use customised fixed appliances to improve the efficiency of orthodontic treatment, the use of adjunctive procedures to accelerate tooth movement remains very low. Further research is needed to understand the possible limitations and restrictions surrounding this area of practice.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":48559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Orthodontic Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Orthodontic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2024-0017\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Orthodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2024-0017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Orthodontists’ perception and attitude toward accelerated orthodontic treatments in Australia
The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to survey the perception and attitude of Australian orthodontists toward accelerated orthodontic treatments.
An online questionnaire was distributed to 427 members of the Australian Society of Orthodontists. The questions related to: clinic demographics, familiarity with appliances/procedures to accelerate orthodontic treatment, the use of appliances/procedures to accelerate orthodontic treatment, and satisfaction with the outcomes when employing these appliances/procedures.
The response rate was 42.38%. Of the respondents, 26.6% used customised fixed appliances which provided satisfactory outcomes. A small proportion of the respondents routinely used adjunctive procedures to accelerate treatment: 3.5% (n=6) corticotomies, 1.2% (n=2) piezocision, and 1.2% (n=2) intraoral vibrating devices.
Although a significant number of Australian orthodontists use customised fixed appliances to improve the efficiency of orthodontic treatment, the use of adjunctive procedures to accelerate tooth movement remains very low. Further research is needed to understand the possible limitations and restrictions surrounding this area of practice.
期刊介绍:
The Australasian Orthodontic Journal (AOJ) is the official scientific publication of the Australian Society of Orthodontists.
Previously titled the Australian Orthodontic Journal, the name of the publication was changed in 2017 to provide the region with additional representation because of a substantial increase in the number of submitted overseas'' manuscripts. The volume and issue numbers continue in sequence and only the ISSN numbers have been updated.
The AOJ publishes original research papers, clinical reports, book reviews, abstracts from other journals, and other material which is of interest to orthodontists and is in the interest of their continuing education. It is published twice a year in November and May.
The AOJ is indexed and abstracted by Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) and Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition.