利用混合土壤修复受铅污染的城市土壤并保护公众健康的风险管理方法

Loryssa M. Lake , Sarah B. Scott , Darryl B. Hood , Meagan Kellis , Mary M. Gardiner , Nicholas T. Basta
{"title":"利用混合土壤修复受铅污染的城市土壤并保护公众健康的风险管理方法","authors":"Loryssa M. Lake ,&nbsp;Sarah B. Scott ,&nbsp;Darryl B. Hood ,&nbsp;Meagan Kellis ,&nbsp;Mary M. Gardiner ,&nbsp;Nicholas T. Basta","doi":"10.1016/j.seh.2024.100102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Anthropogenic activities have left a legacy of contaminated vacant land, which disproportionately affects lower income communities and can have detrimental impacts on human health, particularly children. A management solution is needed to address this widespread lead contamination in urban soils of vacant lots. In this study, high-Fe biosolids incinerator ash (BIA) was evaluated for its ability to sequester soil Pb. Five blends were created using BIA and different amount of other products (dredge, biosolids compost, and yard waste compost) to determine the most effective treatment to reduce Pb bioaccessibility in the soil. The sorption capacity of the BIA for Pb was evaluated by mixing the BIA with Pb(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> at 1000 to 100,000 ​mg ​Pb/kg BIA. The contaminated soil from Cleveland, OH was treated with five BIA-based blends at a 1:1 (w/w) ratio, and Pb bioaccessibility was evaluated using USEPA Method 1340 ​at pH 2.5 and the Physiologically Based Extraction Test (PBET) at pH 2.5. BIA was a strong sorbent for Pb, sorbing ∼100% of the Pb from solution at 10,000 ​mg/L with only 41% bioaccessibility based on Method 1340 ​at pH 2.5. The blend containing 4.5%, 10%, or 19% BIA reduced the Pb bioaccessibility by 48% from the control based on both bioaccessibility methods. The bioaccessible Pb determined by PBET was less than that by USEPA Method 1340 ​at pH 2.5. However, similar reductions in bioaccessible Pb between blend-treated soils and the unamended soil were observed for all bioaccessibility methods. Plant growth assays showed the blends to have little to no significant impact on clover growth, mortality, or flower production, with the blend containing 10% BIA showing greater biomass yield. Results showed BIA-based blends were able to reduce bioaccessible Pb in the soil. This remediation approach may improve the urban living environment and protects public health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94356,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Environmental Health","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949919424000451/pdfft?md5=7ec034de4e270e42931f968e0ce2c935&pid=1-s2.0-S2949919424000451-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk management approach using ash-based amendment blends for remediation of lead-contaminated urban soils and protection of public health\",\"authors\":\"Loryssa M. Lake ,&nbsp;Sarah B. Scott ,&nbsp;Darryl B. Hood ,&nbsp;Meagan Kellis ,&nbsp;Mary M. Gardiner ,&nbsp;Nicholas T. Basta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.seh.2024.100102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Anthropogenic activities have left a legacy of contaminated vacant land, which disproportionately affects lower income communities and can have detrimental impacts on human health, particularly children. A management solution is needed to address this widespread lead contamination in urban soils of vacant lots. In this study, high-Fe biosolids incinerator ash (BIA) was evaluated for its ability to sequester soil Pb. Five blends were created using BIA and different amount of other products (dredge, biosolids compost, and yard waste compost) to determine the most effective treatment to reduce Pb bioaccessibility in the soil. The sorption capacity of the BIA for Pb was evaluated by mixing the BIA with Pb(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> at 1000 to 100,000 ​mg ​Pb/kg BIA. The contaminated soil from Cleveland, OH was treated with five BIA-based blends at a 1:1 (w/w) ratio, and Pb bioaccessibility was evaluated using USEPA Method 1340 ​at pH 2.5 and the Physiologically Based Extraction Test (PBET) at pH 2.5. BIA was a strong sorbent for Pb, sorbing ∼100% of the Pb from solution at 10,000 ​mg/L with only 41% bioaccessibility based on Method 1340 ​at pH 2.5. The blend containing 4.5%, 10%, or 19% BIA reduced the Pb bioaccessibility by 48% from the control based on both bioaccessibility methods. The bioaccessible Pb determined by PBET was less than that by USEPA Method 1340 ​at pH 2.5. However, similar reductions in bioaccessible Pb between blend-treated soils and the unamended soil were observed for all bioaccessibility methods. Plant growth assays showed the blends to have little to no significant impact on clover growth, mortality, or flower production, with the blend containing 10% BIA showing greater biomass yield. Results showed BIA-based blends were able to reduce bioaccessible Pb in the soil. This remediation approach may improve the urban living environment and protects public health.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil & Environmental Health\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949919424000451/pdfft?md5=7ec034de4e270e42931f968e0ce2c935&pid=1-s2.0-S2949919424000451-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil & Environmental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949919424000451\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949919424000451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人为活动留下了受污染的空地,这对低收入社区的影响尤为严重,并可能对人类健康,尤其是儿童的健康产生不利影响。需要一种管理解决方案来解决城市空地土壤中普遍存在的铅污染问题。在这项研究中,对高铁生物固体焚烧炉灰(BIA)固存土壤中铅的能力进行了评估。研究人员使用 BIA 和不同数量的其他产品(疏浚土、生物固体堆肥和庭院垃圾堆肥)制作了五种混合物,以确定最有效的处理方法,降低土壤中铅的生物可及性。通过将 1000 至 100,000 mg Pb/kg BIA 与 Pb(NO3)2 混合,评估了 BIA 对铅的吸附能力。俄亥俄州克利夫兰市的受污染土壤用五种基于 BIA 的混合物以 1:1 (w/w)的比例进行了处理,并在 pH 值为 2.5 时使用美国环保局方法 1340 和 pH 值为 2.5 时使用生理学萃取试验 (PBET) 评估了铅的生物可吸附性。BIA 是一种强力的铅吸附剂,在 pH 值为 2.5 时,根据 1340 方法,它能从 10,000 mg/L 的溶液中吸附 ∼100% 的铅,而生物可吸附性仅为 41%。根据两种生物可及性方法,含有 4.5%、10% 或 19% BIA 的混合物比对照组的铅生物可及性降低了 48%。在 pH 值为 2.5 时,用 PBET 测定的生物可及铅低于用 USEPA 方法 1340 测定的生物可及铅。不过,在所有生物可及性方法中,经混合处理的土壤和未经改良的土壤中生物可及铅的减少量相似。植物生长测定显示,混合物对三叶草的生长、死亡率或花朵产量几乎没有显著影响,而含有 10% BIA 的混合物生物量产量更高。结果表明,基于 BIA 的混合物能够减少土壤中生物可获取的铅。这种修复方法可以改善城市生活环境,保护公众健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk management approach using ash-based amendment blends for remediation of lead-contaminated urban soils and protection of public health

Anthropogenic activities have left a legacy of contaminated vacant land, which disproportionately affects lower income communities and can have detrimental impacts on human health, particularly children. A management solution is needed to address this widespread lead contamination in urban soils of vacant lots. In this study, high-Fe biosolids incinerator ash (BIA) was evaluated for its ability to sequester soil Pb. Five blends were created using BIA and different amount of other products (dredge, biosolids compost, and yard waste compost) to determine the most effective treatment to reduce Pb bioaccessibility in the soil. The sorption capacity of the BIA for Pb was evaluated by mixing the BIA with Pb(NO3)2 at 1000 to 100,000 ​mg ​Pb/kg BIA. The contaminated soil from Cleveland, OH was treated with five BIA-based blends at a 1:1 (w/w) ratio, and Pb bioaccessibility was evaluated using USEPA Method 1340 ​at pH 2.5 and the Physiologically Based Extraction Test (PBET) at pH 2.5. BIA was a strong sorbent for Pb, sorbing ∼100% of the Pb from solution at 10,000 ​mg/L with only 41% bioaccessibility based on Method 1340 ​at pH 2.5. The blend containing 4.5%, 10%, or 19% BIA reduced the Pb bioaccessibility by 48% from the control based on both bioaccessibility methods. The bioaccessible Pb determined by PBET was less than that by USEPA Method 1340 ​at pH 2.5. However, similar reductions in bioaccessible Pb between blend-treated soils and the unamended soil were observed for all bioaccessibility methods. Plant growth assays showed the blends to have little to no significant impact on clover growth, mortality, or flower production, with the blend containing 10% BIA showing greater biomass yield. Results showed BIA-based blends were able to reduce bioaccessible Pb in the soil. This remediation approach may improve the urban living environment and protects public health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Water-stable aggregation and organic matter stabilisation by native plant Acacia auriculiformis in an early Technosol eco-engineered from Fe-ore tailings Effects of pyrolysis temperature on the photooxidation of water-soluble fraction of wheat straw biochar based on 21 ​T FT-ICR mass spectrometry In-situ prediction of soil organic carbon contents in wheat-rice rotation fields via visible near-infrared spectroscopy The potential of phosphate mine tailings in the remediation of acidic Pb-contaminated soil Fortifying casein phosphopeptides and Ca in wheat reduces the As, Cd, and Pb bioavailability based on a mouse model: Calcium and phosphate transporters and gut microbiota
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1