表面结构测定 60 年

IF 2.1 4区化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL Surface Science Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1016/j.susc.2024.122552

{"title":"表面结构测定 60 年","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.susc.2024.122552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A brief review is presented of the development and application of quantitative structural studies of surfaces in the last 60 years. The development of the earliest method, and the one that remains the benchmark technique, namely quantitative low energy electron diffraction (QLEED) is described, and its underlying methodology compared with alternative techniques that have emerged subsequently. In particular, the role of scanning tunnelling microscopy (STM) and density functional theory (DFT), a combination of methods that has typified many more recent surface structural studies, is compared and contrasted with ‘traditional’ quantitative experimental methods such as QLEED.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22100,"journal":{"name":"Surface Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039602824001031/pdfft?md5=0eb96ac83d02e2ec5468e287adb20777&pid=1-s2.0-S0039602824001031-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"60 years of surface structure determination\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.susc.2024.122552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A brief review is presented of the development and application of quantitative structural studies of surfaces in the last 60 years. The development of the earliest method, and the one that remains the benchmark technique, namely quantitative low energy electron diffraction (QLEED) is described, and its underlying methodology compared with alternative techniques that have emerged subsequently. In particular, the role of scanning tunnelling microscopy (STM) and density functional theory (DFT), a combination of methods that has typified many more recent surface structural studies, is compared and contrasted with ‘traditional’ quantitative experimental methods such as QLEED.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surface Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039602824001031/pdfft?md5=0eb96ac83d02e2ec5468e287adb20777&pid=1-s2.0-S0039602824001031-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surface Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039602824001031\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surface Science","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039602824001031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文简要回顾了过去 60 年中表面定量结构研究的发展和应用。报告介绍了最早的方法，也是至今仍是基准技术的方法，即定量低能电子衍射（QLEED）的发展，并将其基本方法与后来出现的替代技术进行了比较。特别是将扫描隧道显微镜（STM）和密度泛函理论（DFT）的作用与 QLEED 等 "传统 "定量实验方法进行了比较和对比。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

60 years of surface structure determination

A brief review is presented of the development and application of quantitative structural studies of surfaces in the last 60 years. The development of the earliest method, and the one that remains the benchmark technique, namely quantitative low energy electron diffraction (QLEED) is described, and its underlying methodology compared with alternative techniques that have emerged subsequently. In particular, the role of scanning tunnelling microscopy (STM) and density functional theory (DFT), a combination of methods that has typified many more recent surface structural studies, is compared and contrasted with ‘traditional’ quantitative experimental methods such as QLEED.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Surface Science 化学-物理：凝聚态物理

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

5.30%

发文量

137

审稿时长

25 days

期刊介绍： Surface Science is devoted to elucidating the fundamental aspects of chemistry and physics occurring at a wide range of surfaces and interfaces and to disseminating this knowledge fast. The journal welcomes a broad spectrum of topics, including but not limited to: • model systems (e.g. in Ultra High Vacuum) under well-controlled reactive conditions • nanoscale science and engineering, including manipulation of matter at the atomic/molecular scale and assembly phenomena • reactivity of surfaces as related to various applied areas including heterogeneous catalysis, chemistry at electrified interfaces, and semiconductors functionalization • phenomena at interfaces relevant to energy storage and conversion, and fuels production and utilization • surface reactivity for environmental protection and pollution remediation • interactions at surfaces of soft matter, including polymers and biomaterials. Both experimental and theoretical work, including modeling, is within the scope of the journal. Work published in Surface Science reaches a wide readership, from chemistry and physics to biology and materials science and engineering, providing an excellent forum for cross-fertilization of ideas and broad dissemination of scientific discoveries.